a reply to: chelsdh
you can control information channels, a low mortality virus is a significantly more effective means of establishing a technocratic state.
A high mortality virus can run completely out of control, for one, and it would also unleash backlash from elements in our society that the
technocrats reaalllyyyyy dont want to provoke in those circumstances.
My guess would be that any depopulation agenda would be a slow-burn operation. Probably some combo of environmental cancers and vaccine induced
sterility. Like the above, this provides exceptionally granular control of the results.
Thats the thing about a lot of the "doomsday scenarios;" they have very little (if any) control over the outcome. It would also make the technocrats
the sole target for retribution & revenge. I mean, why pin a target on ones back if you can just sterilize people in a way that they will never figure
out? Then control response through information channels.
What I would do is release a relatively benign, albeit manufactured virus. Control information channels, institutions, etc. (this aspect is
imperative) and demonize anyone who goes against this Monolith. In the years leading up to The Big Show, I would create a religion by marketing &
manipulation based in real-time feedback from data mining. That inevitably leads to civil unrest, which can easily be manipulated through peoples
emotional addictions (established for years before the "real" operation).
I would then prey on the populations ignorance about viruses. Heavily saturate the field with information that applies to all (or most) viruses, but
frame it as specific to the manufactured one. Emphasize things like "novel" and ensure it never slips that novel viruses emerge quite commonly.
Basically.. Use The Virus as the impetus to drive destabilization and just poke the bear where necessary to make sure it snowballs. Slowly introduce
technology (robotics, AI, etc) that will provide the foundation for compliance enforcement. Market all of it as "for safety and the greater good."
one controls the information channels, a manufactured threat means that the population fights itself. With years of preparation, you can
also control how
the population fights itself. As long as there isnt an actual threat or danger to "fix," then this can be sustained
indefinitely. This paradigm works across the board for social group interactions.
The goals would be:
1) Never become the target for backlash. Or, if you do, make sure that the reality of the scenario isnt severe enough to precipitate those you wish to
subjugate having nothing left to lose.
2)Control information. Let the real stuff remain available, as the group that will actually look into it will have "ammo" to fight those that buy into
the manufactured Narrative. Slowly amplify the disconnect between the manufactured Narrative and reality. This will shed individuals who question it,
but those remaining will be more disconnected and zealous. Ensure that what the zealots are fighting to achieve is perceived as unquestionably
righteous, but derived from manufactured Narratives.
3)Exploit any opportunity to further destabilize nations due to the emotional climate. Achieve this through education, media, medicine, the legal
4)Slowly establish the true means of control (centralized dependency, robotics, social credit & blackmail, etc)
5)Always, always, always
frame things as being against what those things actually perpetuate (i.e. "anti-racism" perpetuates racism)
Years and years ago, to fight this stuff, I spent enormous effort figuring out how I would do it as well as the best means to prevent it. I could
point out the mistakes I believe they made, but would prefer not to provide constructive criticism.
The biggest hurdle to any of this would be actually subverting & suborning everything from markets to social movements to global organizations.
Everything else would be, essentially, completely predictable with a great deal of reliability.
There are a few major factors that derail the plans. Some beneficial to humanity (true decentralization with modern tech), some exceptionally
detrimental (a truly high mortality pathogen). But, if you can create an environment where beneficial paths are seen as non-sequitor as well as a
paradigm where a meaningful percentage of the population ceases to build, invent, and innovate.. Success is nearly inevitable.
Every action that people take is predetermined, planted, and guided, from policing others for compliance (masks, vaccines, etc) to protests & riots.
It will all work towards the same end.
As long as most are too busy fighting over what "reality" is, they will never consider anything outside of that battleground. Anything that would
precipitate a solid consensus reality (like a high mortality pathogen, Floyd incident, "cuties") would be avoided at nearly any cost. Which is rather
easily accomplished as long as the media acts in time to prevent consensus between the "sides."
I dunno, at the very least, it makes for a wonderfully "ATS-esque" conspiracy post
The media can not be trusted under any circumstances though.
And, its critically important to understand that spending all our time debunking their Narrative perpetuates the manufactured realities just as
as blindly buying into it.