It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by AnarchistSuperstar
So if something "supernatural," were to exist, by its own definition is illogical and non-existant
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Originally posted by AnarchistSuperstar
"It appears that you're a pantheist if you're going to define god into existance by essentially modifying the definitions of Nature/Reality into "God," sure."
Sir, did you not "re-define" or give a "modifying" definition of Nature/Reality not being God? Whats the difference? You fail to grasp that God is beyond mere definition. You seek an answer to something that, indeed, requires no proof. The "proof" exists all around you but for whatever reasons, other than denial, you fail to see or bluntly, don't want to see.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"I've no reason to worship nature/reality, either. My rights were not given by a deity. My creator are my parents, who engaged in sexual intercourse leading to biological reproduction. There was no deity involved, the same happened for you. People create their own rights, and take them away if they wish."
Darwinism, evolution..............please. Stop. Take a deep breath. Your logics adding up to being "logical" are only through your eyes....in other words, your belief, your view, your idea, your thought, your opinion. Question, explain to me what conclusively, empirically, "sparked" the Primordial soup to kick start "evolution"? If you can answer this empirically please feel free to simply send that answer in to this contest to collect your money. Please be warned though....that NO ONE has been able to do so. www.us.net... Also, might want to look at who the judges are for authenticity....you have pretty much all the big names in the many various fields of "origins". Pray tell, could you also tell me where and how the "Helix" came about?
Secondly, God is not a "deity". A "deity" is something like Zues, Apollo, etc. That may well be your conclusion and explanation for God, but again, be rest assurd God will reveal His true nature and character, as other than a "deity", to you in His time....not yours!
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"I'm talking about "If God existed, and had the ability to change the events that happened, and was indeed loving, would God indeed refuse to help a starving child?" You attempt a red herring, which is sad."
First off, you sir, are indeed creating the "red herring"....I would go as far as saying, your calling the kettle black and thats truly the sad thing about this. God does not control events nor us, nor your actions, deeds, etc. We are governed by a natural law, for which God invented and implemented.....for every action there is a consequence! Simple, to the point, nothing to read into. "Sufferings" are a cause of Man. Man is defined as: you, me, it, they, everyone, humans, etc. "Sufferings" are not by God, nor attributed to God; they are an "effect". You know, the theory of "cause and effect"....well, goes something like this.....we, Man, are the "cause" and those children you so keep bringing up are the "effect". Why do you insist on believing that God has to be responsible for our "causes"? It again equates to nothing more than denial.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"Because indeed, man creates his own problems, thats because deities do not exist."
If thats your best "answer".......that is also your opinion and further equates to flawed "evidences". I have already told you God is not a "deity". "Deity" has set powers, abilities, etc. "Deities" requires and needs. God neither requires nor needs and is "unlimited."
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"I've no reason to assume some loving deity lets children suffer, there must be an explanation as to why then there is suffering. Easy, there is no quick fix-all you can pray to, if man wants to fix his problems, he has to get serious about it."
Thats, again, your preference, your conclusion, and a answer that best suits you.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"You're accusing me, as a homosapien of contributing to the worlds problems? On the contrary, I do much to end them, I'm not part of the problem, I'm part of the solution. No, not all the easy questions have been answered, I believe that to be a lie of the utmost order."
Lie? Care to explain? Your perhaps are lying to yourself when you claim you are not part of the problem but part of the solution. You are an entity, individual, that is part of a greater entity, Humankind. If the problem persists, you are, simply still apart of the problem. All of us can claim to be apart of the solution but in truth.....problem and solution are not intrinsic...they are one in the same. Till the problem is solved, the problem persists, thus if the problem persists, you are still apart of the problem.....you know......'B' is to 'A' as 'A' is to 'B'.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"You talk about me denying a deity and his existance, if this deity exists why isnt it a fact? "
Let me ask you this: what is truly "fact"? What is truly "reality"? I stated it once and I'll state it again.....God does not require proof...it is a matter of being self-evident. If "proof" is required then "faith" is of no consequence, irrelevent. There is no proof for "love", yet you partake of it everyday.....don't you? Love requires more "faith" then believing in God...bet on it. But to address your "need"....again, be assurd, God will reveal Himself to you when He is ready, not you.....God is unavoidable........and you sir, are certainly guarenteed of this.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"I deny all deities, you deny all but one. You must realize humanity has invented several millions of deities. So once you realize what allows you to dismiss all others than yours, you'll understand why I dont make that one tiny exception. I do not act condescending towards people who deny the presupposed existance of Zeus. You're proving nothing, you're just spreading misinformation."
Again, another conclusion, another stance, another postion, another idea.....etc! Do you indeed realize that you, yourself, in telling us we prove nothing, that you prove nothing also? Need I say more? You are the one asserting that "something" does not exist.......you are the one responsible for providing the evidence. Not anyone here.....you have that sole responsibilty. I stated it before......you will neither believe nor except any other view but what agrees to yours or the one you currently hold.....fact! You posted the subject matter...you back it up. Science cannot even disprove the existence of God, how do you expect to do it? Simple denial? They may work for you but proves nothing to no one here but your own self....so why the topic? To just further your "claim" that so "logically" cling to? Answer this: "If believing in a God is irrational; is not believing in a God rational?" Thats deep, and beyond your mere "denial"...be further assurd of that.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
"Technically, no. There are an infinite number of hypothetical gods, equally likely as the next. This proves nothing, however. I would say that they experienced natural phenomenon but did not understand it so they attributed it to the explanation for everything people are too ignorant to understand. "Mommy, why is it raining?" "You made God Cry." These fictitious analogies have no validity or respect inside the scientific community, nor do they give any honest explanation into natural phenomenon. I would severely doubt your sanity. Which sounds better, "I hear a voice in my head and it won't go away" or "God speaks to me and I have a personal relationship with him"?
BillyBob, I'm talking about mathematics, not biological reproduction. Yes, my concept of two determines what two is. If I used the word five to describe the word 2, 5+5=10 in actuality it would equal four. However, Almost everyone (Excluding you) agreed upon what each number represents. Some poor oafs had to write a 200 page book demonstrating that 2+2=4; because of people like you.
A rainbow in its least technical sense is an arc of colored light in the sky caused by refraction of the sun's rays by rain. So are you saying "Arcs of colored light in the sky caused by refractions of the sun's rays by rain is God"? I hope not, because thats laughable. Yes, I'm sure you cannot make reality stop existing by changing the definition of reality to one meaning "Non-existant."
I believe in what exists, I'm not limited to what I can see, hear, taste, touch, smell, etc.
I am not unconscious right now, you're not adding anything interesting to the conversation besides ignorance.
The character Sherlock Holmes is fictional, please think about that.
You're the one who is using psuedo-reason. Fish are presumably possible because they have been demonstrated to be real. They could not however exist in the Dead Sea. I do not see what your point it. Emotions, hallucinations and other physical phenomenon have been explained.
A poet and philosopher once said: "Reality is, once one stops believing in, doesnt go away."
__________________________________________________________________
All the rest of this is just posturing, amounting to nothing other than proving to you that your "Realistic/Realism" stance is the correct postion. I certainly hope your back doesn't hurt, cause that is quite a load of speculation and hypothosis your carrying.
Dude, you are the one claiming that God is non-existent.....that further means, that it is YOU, who have to provide the proofs and evidences, not anyone of us. The problem I see here is that you seek validation for your stance and belief..........cause if you really sought an answer, that answer was already self-evident and had to hurt when it hit you in the face.
Peace.
regards
seekerof
[Edited on 13-7-2003 by Seekerof]
[Edited on 13-7-2003 by Seekerof]
[Edited on 13-7-2003 by Seekerof]
Originally posted by Anarchist...
however why would a deity who loved us, who according to the trinity was once a man allow us to suffer?
Originally posted by FreeMason
Take mass for instance, why does there really need to be mass?
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?
Why would anyone worship a deity that supposedly has the power to stop 40,000 children from dying of starvation every day, yet doesnt?
Originally posted by AnarchistSuperstar
Jagd, It's Anarchist, not Antichrist. That does however remind me of an excerpt from a crass song: "If you dont like religion, you can be the AntiChrist, If you're tired of politics, you can be an Anarchist." It is irrational to believe in the supernatural, seeing as how nothing outside of nature has ever been discovered; and for a good reason: It doesnt exist. Material: N. Derived from or composed of matter; "The material universe." Material just means real.
billybob: waves aren't "real"? your feelings aren't real? thought? nothing outside "nature" has ever been discovered? you've obviously never discussed anti-matter with a snail.
Thank you for offering your opinion about your friends. I dont see the relevency of that. Just because you perceive them as intelligent, that doesnt negate the fact that they have a mental disorder caused by faulty logic. I've spoken to lots of theists who claimed to have God reveal himself to them. Sometimes Yahweh, sometimes Allah; I speak to different theists on a daily basis. Needless to say, all stories are redundant and inane. Please tell me however: "I saw The Lord God manifest himself in my taco", or "God revealed himself to me but I cant prove it to you, just please believe me, why not, I mean, please?"
billybob: believing or not does not change the ultimate, unattainable truth. you simply cannot disprove god's existance. it is always infinity plus one.
No, I will not accept the testimony of man. Because man tends to lie, or spread dis or misinformation. Through their ignorance of natural phenomenon and other mechanisms of reality, they falsely attribute their misunderstanding to some deity that whisks away the truth. Its not that I'm closed off to possibilities, I'm extremely open to them. But opinions in theological matters dont change my mind because they are subjective in a field where they really need to be objective, but never will be. Proof changes my mind, however opions dont.
billybob: and yet you use the testimony of others to base your beliefs. have you personally performed all the scientific experiments and measurements you believe to be true? how do you measure the speed of time?
No, Seekerof. The definition of Nature & Reality do not include any deities, therefore I didnt have to modify the definition to exclude them. "God" is beyond mere definition? Then by your own admission you have no idea what you're talking about, furthermore you have no clue as to what you worship. The thing is, Deities do have definitions whether you fail to acknowledge them or not. No, once again you make a fallacy. No proof exists that proves the existance of deities or supernatural phenomenon.
billybob: words are weak when discussing the fabric, reason and dimesions of reality.
I'd like to take this moment to give you a thumbs up at your use of italics and bold. Yes, possessing logic tends to make a person logical. I have opinions, but for the most part they stay in the areas of politics and philosophy. I do not make illogical claims, or use opions to objectively verify and dismiss other peoples subjective claims.
billybob: all "proofs" are based on "assumptions". the first being the assumption that your senses aren't lying to you.
Yes, even your "God" is a deity. No matter how you define it. Sorry. I'm creating the red herring? Please pay attention, I was merely stating if there was a deity in existance that was all-loving and knew the pains of being a man and also possessed the illogical and non-existant power of omnipotence that that deity would help the humans he created, knowing their troubles beforehand, so they would not need to suffer pointlessly. The thing is, there is suffering. So if there was a deity in existance, it didnt want to bother itself with the problem of preventing a few thousand children from dying. Not that I'm judging your deity, I just think I could do better than that. I'm not saying I'm more moral, though. Just thinking about it. As you stated earlier, you know absolutely nothing about the concept of your "God." You're speculations arise from some holy book, I suppose... Have you ever read that book all the way through?
billybob: we are insects. so prideful of our intellect. so lost.
no pain, no gain.
KJV James 4:4 Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.
billybob: so maybe 3D is a prison for crazy souls then, yeah?
KJV Matthew 10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
billybob: kill me first. i want out.
KJV 2 Kings 2:23 And he went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head.
billybob: that's known as follicly challenged now.
KJV 2 Kings 2:24 And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them.
billybob: forty two IS the answer.
KJV Genesis 19:24 Then the LORD rained upon Sodom and upon Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven;
billybob: but then Mothra responded with a blast of radioactive breath, saving the day on monster island.
Sure, according to the bible, the concept of "God" controls events, and peoples actions, and deeds. Baawas rule of biblical debate: For every verse, there is an equal, but opposite verse. The bible is laughable like that. But please remember this: Christians do not have faith in "God" so much as they have GREATER faith in the people who told them which god to worship, and ultimately -supreme- faith in thier ability to choose the correct god, and to correctly interpret that god. Christians, in reality, worship nobody but themselves.
billybob: according to the bible, we have free will. that is contradictory to complete control. i agree, there is alot of contradiction in the bible. it suffers from too many chefs. it's a swiss cheese of editing.
Well, if you believe some other deity than whats in the bible, I wonder how you know so much about "God," It would be nice if you admitted you knew absolutely nothing about this concept at which you consistently talk about, which is strange. But, what you say is true, however "God" is nowhere to be found. Cause and effect, people create most of their own problems, and they will be the source of most of mine for the rest of my life.
billybob: if you want to know god, you must be willing to look and listen. you are not. you have already deciced what is real and true, and what is just horsefeathers. a crowning acheivement for a sixteen year old.
I'm denying that if a "God" existed who loved us, he would love us enough to stop us from suffering. Being as to how some parts of the bible talk about "God" being omniscient and "God" creating people and knowing everything about them, what mistakes they'll committ, which place they'll end up in when they die: "Heaven" or "Hell." Notice that there aren't any actual pictures of those places, only artists conceptions of "Heaven" or "Hell"?
billybob: cameras tend to melt in hell. people take pictures in heaven, but don't want to leave to have them developed. people often make the mistake of extrapolating their value system into god's. we are dust.
No, Your deity is limited too because it cannot do the impossible, meaning your deity is bound by logic. I say thats disinformation trickled down to ordinary people as misinformation whom are too ignorant to realize it. There are solutions to every problem, most aren't realistic because humans have become complacent and docile.
billybob: you are building your own logic traps and cages. it is always possible to imagine an opposite. imagination is where all great concepts and realizations come from. it could ALL be disinfo.
A "fact" is something which has been proven, not through subjectivity, rather objectivity.
billybob: an experiment can yield the same results millions of times. that does not mean that the next time will yield the same results. it is an assumption to claim ANYTHING as a hardened "fact". we are slaves to our perception.
No, no deities will reveal themselves to me. You dont have to avoid something which isnt there. Just a logical explanation, sometimes when I was earlier and frightened of the dark for illogical reasons, I thought "I enjoy the dark, because it hides what could so easily be there in the light." And it has not since bothered me.
billybob: perhaps you have not yet sensed the elephant in the room.
I use logic, science, philosophy, studied theology and a matter of things to disprove deities.
billybob: the observer effect, you seek to disprove, that is what you observe. however, once again, you cannot prove or disprove the existance of god(s).
Since believing in deities is irrational, it would be rational to disbelieve all of them until evidence emerged that one may exist. Not saying thats going to happen, but I'm saying yes it is irrational and if you care about your sanity you might want to pursue that options.
billybob: statistically speaking, you're in a small minority. that makes you "abnormal" mentally.
I've been doing that, if you make claims, I'll feel free to refute them. Deities have already been disproven, you simply avoid the inevitable. Mark twain said: "Faith is believing what you know ain't so." I dont require validation because mine is validated. And not by intellectual dishonest systems such as "faith." Thanks for your time.
billybob: mark twain was wrong. faith is KNOWING what you know ain't so.
Just because you believe something to be true doesnt make it true, if that were the case, this world would be a scary place.
billybob: apply to self.
The universe is more than two dimensions. We do know what reality is.
billybob: HAHAHAHA!!!!
2: the state of being insubstantial or imaginary; not existing objectively or in fact [syn: irreality, reality]
Thats unrealitys definition. Yes, because most of you are christian theists. What is your deity besides some personified imagination concocted by primitives? Sure you can, if someone says "I believe in the invisible pink unicorn!" You can use logic to say: "If this unicorn otherwise known as a mythological creature was invisible, it could not be pink." Thus disproving the deity, one tiny inconsistency means non-existance. Science proves no deities, it just further expands human knowledge about nature/reality. Something existing isnt illogical, sorry.
billybob: it could be a higher harmonic of pink. invisible to humans, yet pink to those who exist in the higher vibrational realm.
If you want to worship nature, thats fine. Do you have existance without matter? No.
billybob: another assumption based on observation. this cannot be known by us here..
Water refracts light at a different angle, that doesnt mean thats a paradox and the sky is falling. So why would a parallax make you behave that way? Two is a number which is a concept which is intaniglbe but which yet exists to let us understand nature. That does not mean that numbers are without use.
billybob: huh?
There are an infinite number of hypothetical deities which means that you have a 1/x=amount of deities chance of picking the correct one and ending up in heaven. Perhaps the real deity doesnt have a heaven or hell. Still, You're playing the theological lottery. And if you've ever played the lottery, you'd know you're going to lose.
billybob: and you put the cart before the horse. it's all just a dream, man.
What would we lose? Perhaps there actually is an all-loving god who doesnt punish people for being logical. Ever hear of Atheos? That deity rewards skepticism. I'm not trying to convert anyone, just open their minds up a bit.
billybob: so would you say that Atheos is your god?
Please, demonstrate that evil is objective and that this supernatural entity known as "satan" exists. Most of those children dont believe in Yahweh, they believe in other deities.
I believe in life *before* death, and I dont believe in some spooky place existing in some spiritual realm where people who think are punished for eternity, its just laughable to me. But, I realize that you actually believe that, which is fine.
billybob: a very narrow scope on what others believe. what i believe changes by the minute.
I'm not going to be happy for children dying of lukemia, why would anyone in their right mind be happy for them, thats sick.
billybob: dis-ease is one of the teaching tools employed by the higher ups.
Why would "god" help? "God" never helps.
billybob: oops, now you really made him/her/it/they mad.
Jesus according to a 2,000 year old book rose from the dead (Dead people stay dead, so if he rose in the first place he was never actually dead, more like he was in a coma or unconscious state.) technically making him a zombie or undead. Jesus's resurrection is a myth, he died only once, just like all over organisms.
billybob: so sure of yourself. anything is possible. anything.
I'm not going to be christian because the bible has some nice stories. George Orwell has some nice stories, too. I dont see how age is relevent, but your enquiry is fine, I'm sixteen. I've no problems to talk about, other than my soundcard isnt working properly. People who become lost in their life and cant find where they were going and who go to religion for help have very little self-reliance.
billybob: your very sharp for a sixteen year old. don't let pride of intellect blind you to the possibilities of higher reality. to a can of paint, WE are the unknowable unimaginable gods. we are cans of paint to god. or "straw dogs" to use a taoist term.
When you die, God might denie your existance.
I wish you much luck, cause, honestly, your going to need it.
If you disbelieve this, you are, in effect, calling God a liar---not matter how "good" you are, this affront will bar you from the Kingdom of Heaven.
What would yu do if Jesus did show up? Say, "Oh, wait, um, I made a mistake. Gimme a chance. C'mon, man!"
Originally posted by AnarchistSuperstar
Do you have to reply inside of a quote, its difficult to read. Its like adding your own words into someone elses words, its not right. Sigh, I'll take a stab at this. When did I claim that waves arent real, or feelings arent real or thoughts arent real? I've never said anything like that, no nothing exists outside of nature.
All deities have been disproven already. I dont base my beliefs in other peoples testimony. There is no speed of time. Reality exists, no matter how you describe it.
We have ways of demonstrating that our senses arent lying to us. You sound like a paranoid schizophrenic. We are mammals, not insects. We have lots of reasons to be proud of our intelligence. We're not lost, and no pain no gain is pretty faulty.
You're making absolutely no sense with your incoherent rant.
Yes, religion is rediculous. Even the original bibles are full of contradictions, the ones in greek and hebrew, they are no better. I've been looking and listening, I have opened myself up to the possibility that they might exist, but to date nothing has occured, just another peice in my research against theology. If theology is a practice, so should Atheology.
Hell tends not to exist within the realm of reality. Yes, you just made a claim that makes you look insane. Yes, it could all be disinfo, but most of it isnt. The past can help us predict the future, We arent slaves to perception, we are slaves to governments and theism. We're learning to understand nature and everything about it, there is alot to know. There is no elephant in the room, no I dont sense things that arent there, thats what theists do, they have a mental disorder.
Deities have been disproven already. Yes, I'm abnormal, but that doesnt effect my sanity. However, you are delusional seeing as how you believe irrational things in spite of invalidating evidence which isnt as abnormal as a freethinker using his noggin'. Nah, Its believing what you know aint so.
You laugh instead of address my point? We have conclusively proven over two dimensions.
No, billybob. Invisible means what it means, without color. Sigh.
Yes, cart before the horse. It wouldnt be that efficient the other way around. No, Atheos is not my deity, I have none. It changes by the minute, thats called inconsistency. Anything possible is possible, sure its tautology, but its right. There is no higher reality, just reality. Okay, I'm doubting your sanity.
Seekerof, please be realistic, no answers are being given to my questions, no reasonable explanation begins with "What if." Alright?
You try too hard to be insulting through condescension, it doesnt suit you.