It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ontogeny55
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
Then the tumble design is against the Geneva convention.
ihl-databases.icrc.org...
originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: vonclod
he claimed .223 and 5.56 don't tumble upon impact. i just showed him that some do. now he's having a little whiny baby hissy fit.
Then the tumble design is against the Geneva convention.
Most countries signed on the dotted line and agreed to use only ball ammo but there was one country that abstained from signing: the United States. That’s right, we never did actually sign it (we signed part but not all of it). We specifically didn’t sign Article IV and under Article IV, Section 3, you find the part where only ball ammo can be used between two signatories. Wait… we were not and are not a signatory. Remember that for
Hague Convention: Does It Only Allow FMJ vs Hollow Point Ammo?
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: ontogeny55
Who cares?
He made them. He bought them from the classifieds. He bought them offline. He borrowed them.
It's irrelevant.
Maybe he hangs around shooting ranges and picks up dropped ammo
It's irrelevant. He has a duty to own a rifle and be ready for battle seeing as he's actively part of the unorganized militia
He did nothing wrong. It's his right to uphold the law and maintain order. It is lawful. Attacking someone is not lawful.
A mob is always a deadly threat.
Arson is a deadly threat
Disarming is a deadly threat
Sorry you don't like the law.
originally posted by: DustDoses
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: ontogeny55
Who cares?
He made them. He bought them from the classifieds. He bought them offline. He borrowed them.
It's irrelevant.
Maybe he hangs around shooting ranges and picks up dropped ammo
It's irrelevant. He has a duty to own a rifle and be ready for battle seeing as he's actively part of the unorganized militia
He did nothing wrong. It's his right to uphold the law and maintain order. It is lawful. Attacking someone is not lawful.
A mob is always a deadly threat.
Arson is a deadly threat
Disarming is a deadly threat
Sorry you don't like the law.
So you can just shoot protestors then, cool.
Or you can shoot someone for stepping up or walking you down.
Good job buddy, that's not the law.
You can't just make up that someone was trying to take your weapon and shoot them in the face, when they haven't even touched you.
Not the real world.
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: vonclod
It's all they know how to do
Their arguments don't stand on their own. They can't hold their own in a debate either, especially when the facts only are discussed not opinions and left wing fluff
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: DustDoses
You can if you FEEL threatened by them and a prosecutor/jury agrees your FEELING was reasonable. THAT is the law
If you see someone setting fires, you can stop the threat.
If you see a mob engaging in violence, you can stop the threat
If someone tries to take your weapon, you can stop the threat
originally posted by: DustDoses
originally posted by: JBurns
a reply to: DustDoses
You can if you FEEL threatened by them and a prosecutor/jury agrees your FEELING was reasonable. THAT is the law
If you see someone setting fires, you can stop the threat.
If you see a mob engaging in violence, you can stop the threat
If someone tries to take your weapon, you can stop the threat
I can show up to a Trump rally, stand on the sidewalk, and point my firearm at people's faces.
If someone yells at me, and approaches me I can shoot them in the face, and a jury is going to buy that I was in reasonable fear of imminent death and let me off.
Cool.
originally posted by: ontogeny55
a reply to: hounddoghowlie
how did Kyle get military rounds for the M16/M4 and use in an AR15?
Bound to be a sales receipt for that,
I will wait.