It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
What do you guys think about this?
thepostglob.com...
Court Approves Warrantless Surveillance Rules
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
What do you guys think about this?
thepostglob.com...
Court Approves Warrantless Surveillance Rules
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
What do you guys think about this?
thepostglob.com...
Court Approves Warrantless Surveillance Rules
I think the FBI needs a major kick in the ass for their abuses. Google, the telcoms, et al, should be broken up for complicity.
Secret courts have to go.
All three branches are rotten to the roots.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
What do you guys think about this?
thepostglob.com...
Court Approves Warrantless Surveillance Rules
This started with the 9/11 event IMO. Bush the shrub pushed this stuff. Seems surreal that this happening here now. I want off this merry-go-round.
Most notably, in August 2019, the F.B.I. made a query for information using the identifiers of about 16,000 people, even though only seven of them had ties to an investigation. The F.B.I. argued that the entire search met the standard of being reasonably likely to retrieve foreign-intelligence information or evidence of a crime, but Judge Boasberg called that position “unsupportable” and portrayed all but the seven as “broad, suspicionless queries.”
Going off on a seemingly absurd, pseudo-scientific, tangent, Dr. Fauci claimed that "industrialization" is to blame for infectious diseases like COVID-19, and the only remedy is to live "in harmony with nature".
We suspect the good doctor is a fan of Greta Thunburg and her fellow "climate activists".
The opposite would be that we reject the simplest explanation and consider more options. Just like on this board we reject the obvious and dig, research and compare ideas.
Q/POTUS-1
Q/POTUS-2
Q/POTUS-3
Q/POTUS-4 [10]
Q/POTUS-3
Q/POTUS-4 [10]
Q/POTUS-5
“Special Place”
CLAS_OP_IAD_(future).
How about a nice game of chess?
SPLASH.
FOX THREE.
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 82d434 No.121327 📁
Dec 18 2017 23:27:52 (EST)
FLASH_BREAK_
/* / /*
Shall we play a game?
Map is critical to understand.
Future unlocks past.
DECLAS_ATL_(past).
News unlocks map.
Find the markers.
10 & [10].
12/7 – 12/17.
Concourse F.
Terminal 5.
Private_operated plane (OP)?
ATL -> IAD
Extraction/known.
Dark.
Darkness.
Learn double meanings.
SHUTDOWN.
Q/POTUS-1
Q/POTUS-2
Q/POTUS-3
Q/POTUS-4 [10]
Q/POTUS-5
“Special Place”
Why are drops highlighted by POTUS shortly thereafter?
Coincidence or message?
“The Great Awakening”
POTUS today.
Unlock?
CLAS_OP_IAD_(future).
How about a nice game of chess?
SPLASH.
FOX THREE.
Q
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Jackie Kennedy knew something. It was she who requested the records be sealed for 75 years.
originally posted by: Guyfriday
originally posted by: Creep Thumper
a reply to: EndtheMadnessNow
Jackie Kennedy knew something. It was she who requested the records be sealed for 75 years.
Which is funny since her brother, Gore Vidal, has been going off about these thing since before the JFK incident.
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
What do you guys think about this?
thepostglob.com...
Court Approves Warrantless Surveillance Rules
This started with the 9/11 event IMO. Bush the shrub pushed this stuff. Seems surreal that this happening here now. I want off this merry-go-round.
Most notably, in August 2019, the F.B.I. made a query for information using the identifiers of about 16,000 people, even though only seven of them had ties to an investigation. The F.B.I. argued that the entire search met the standard of being reasonably likely to retrieve foreign-intelligence information or evidence of a crime, but Judge Boasberg called that position “unsupportable” and portrayed all but the seven as “broad, suspicionless queries.”
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: scraedtosleep
What do you guys think about this?
thepostglob.com...
Court Approves Warrantless Surveillance Rules
This started with the 9/11 event IMO. Bush the shrub pushed this stuff. Seems surreal that this happening here now. I want off this merry-go-round.
originally posted by: F2d5thCavv2
a reply to: butcherguy
Retransmission 5X5
Cheers