It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CDC quietly changes testing guidelines to exclude people with no symptoms

page: 8
22
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 08:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Liquesence

An opinion is not necessarily BS.
Unless it conflicts with evidence. But when evidence must be denied in order to support one's opinion chances are good that it is BS.



I know.
Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.




posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash



You know I'm setting you up right?

I'm taking my time and relishing this one.


Ditto. Because we all know you're FOS.


edit on 26-8-2020 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 08:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: muzzleflash


My claim was that there is no source.

I also said that. That was kinda my initial point, chief.

Which means your argument is BS if you can't prove your claim.



LOL

Almost copying me word for word now...



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.
edit on 8/26/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: muzzleflash


My claim was that there is no source.

I also said that. That was kinda my initial point, chief.

Which means your argument is BS if you can't prove your claim.



LOL

Almost copying me word for word now...


Except I'm asking you to prove and give stats and data about your claim about common cold deaths claim, which you still can't do, because it's BS.

So you're attempting to change the narrative to make yourself feel better.

It's ok.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.


What evidence did I reject?



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: muzzleflash


My claim was that there is no source.

I also said that. That was kinda my initial point, chief.

Which means your argument is BS if you can't prove your claim.



LOL

Almost copying me word for word now...


Except I'm asking you to prove and give stats and data about your claim about common cold deaths claim, which you still can't do, because it's BS.

So you're attempting to change the narrative to make yourself feel better.

It's ok.


You changed the narrative then projected it on me cuz your ego requires you to win all the time because of your insecurities.

I said there was no evidence now you're copying me so you can win too.

The only thing you won was my attention. Grats.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: muzzleflash


My claim was that there is no source.

I also said that. That was kinda my initial point, chief.

Which means your argument is BS if you can't prove your claim.



LOL

Almost copying me word for word now...


Except I'm asking you to prove and give stats and data about your claim about common cold deaths claim, which you still can't do, because it's BS.

So you're attempting to change the narrative to make yourself feel better.

It's ok.


You changed the narrative then projected it on me cuz your ego requires you to win all the time because of your insecurities.
.



Lol, you just described yourself.
🤣



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.




What evidence did I reject?

Presented Here

One example.
edit on 8/26/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash



You changed the narrative then projected it on me cuz your ego requires you to win all the time because of your insecurities.


How's that data about common cold & flu and covid deaths coming, chief?



I said there was no evidence now you're copying me so you can win too.


Oh wait. I also said there was no evidence. That was my point, in case you forgot.

So you're purposely peddling BS and trolling when you have been proved wrong and can't support your position with actual data? Get your own material.

Or just make # up.
edit on 26-8-2020 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.




What evidence did I reject?

Presented Here

One example.


Already been addressed.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:41 PM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

Yes.
You rejected the data. All you said was "fake."

edit on 8/26/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.




What evidence did I reject?

Presented Here

One example.


Already been addressed.


So how's that data coming along?



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:42 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

No you get your own material.

You don't copy me good enough to meet my standards or criteria for emulation.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.




What evidence did I reject?

Presented Here

One example.


Already been addressed.


So how's that data coming along?


Posted it like 20 times over the last couple months.

So I'm finished supplying it before this argument began.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Liquesence

No you get your own material.

You don't copy me good enough to meet my standards or criteria for emulation.


You find that data to support your BS claim yet?

Asking for a friend.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash

Yes.
You rejected the data. All you said was "fake."


No I asked questions.
I inferred it was out of context by asking.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash




Here I brought evidence of no evidence and he thinks I needed evidence to prove it.

Incorrect.

All you have done is reject evidence.




What evidence did I reject?

Presented Here

One example.


Already been addressed.


So how's that data coming along?


Posted it like 20 times over the last couple months.

So I'm finished supplying it before this argument began.


Then it won't kill ya to provide it here, now, for the 21st time.

Unless you don't have it. And unless you're fos. Which is it?
edit on 26-8-2020 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Liquesence

No you get your own material.

You don't copy me good enough to meet my standards or criteria for emulation.


You find that data to support your BS claim yet?

Asking for a friend.


I dont have a BS claim.

I try to stick to rationality as best as possible.

I have plenty to support my valid claims...
I post it pretty often.
You could learn tons going back to read all of it.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: muzzleflash

Yes.
You rejected the data. All you said was "fake."


No I asked questions.
I inferred it was out of context by asking.


It was not out of context.

Unless you think those excess deaths were the result of something other than COVID-19. So, if not COVID-19, what was it? The common cold suddenly got more deadly?

edit on 8/26/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join