It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

CDC quietly changes testing guidelines to exclude people with no symptoms

page: 2
22
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6




The CDC switched because the data now doesn't support thier earlier conclusions.


Do have a source to back up that assertion?




posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: putnam6




The CDC switched because the data now doesn't support thier earlier conclusions.


Do have a source to back up that assertion?



LOL just pure speculation here Sookie though it is puzzling? this is the opposite of what we have been told for months or do you not agree?

Why did the CDC change and why did they do it so quietly? is it simply because it's good news?



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:20 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

There is no good news here. People who have Covid 19 but are feeling fine can still spread the virus. If you knew you had the virus, even though you're feeling fine, would you go visit your grandma? Not knowing if you have the virus or not is not going to protect your grandmother from getting it from you, if you do have it.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:22 PM
link   
When the Convid first started, in my area they wouldn’t test anyone that didn’t have symptoms.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

This was on the local news last night. Guess they havent kept it to quiet.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66




When the Convid first started, in my area they wouldn’t test anyone that didn’t have symptoms.


Right, because testing supplies were scarce. They did want you wearing masks either, because we needed to save them for medical workers.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: putnam6

Because now they have the results of hundreds of thousands of tests which have shown very few asymptomatic people have tested positive?


So it all boils down to " Don't test the sick people "

It's amazing that doing things normaly is such a big deal .
edit on 26-8-2020 by Fallingdown because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:35 PM
link   

edit on 26-8-2020 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:36 PM
link   
Sounds like a step in the right direction. With some of these testing kits being used in Melbourne coming straight from China, are they actually measuring your social credit score?



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:44 PM
link   
Nine hours ago, our health minister Jens Spahn announced that travelers from non risk areas will have to pay for a test if they want one.

First step in reducing down the number of tests, that are not ordered because of symptoms. This has to be pure coincidence.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 03:58 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6



Something is up, is it more political or biological?


Oh, this is political, it's always been political since it's an election year.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: putnam6

There is no good news here. People who have Covid 19 but are feeling fine can still spread the virus. If you knew you had the virus, even though you're feeling fine, would you go visit your grandma? Not knowing if you have the virus or not is not going to protect your grandmother from getting it from you, if you do have it.



My grandmothers are long gone #1 and #2 thats why them not testing is so puzzling?

No they have tested plenty and they know their statistical models are showing it's not anywhere as contagious as it was believe to be. It's risk doesn't warrant the expenditure anymore.

What's interesting is out of the 34 states now below 1.0 Rt,the south only has 3 above it and and 2 of those Texas and Kentucky are right at 1.0 leaving North Carolina at 1.14. Remember when everybody was freaking out about the south Georgia was swamped so was Louisiana yet these states didn't lockdown nearly as long as some of the others.28 of those 34 states below 1.0 Rt reopened most of them much earlier than everyhwere else.

So we can remember Rt, a key measure of how fast the virus is growing. It’s the average number of people who become infected by an infectious person. If Rt is above 1.0, the virus will spread quickly. When Rt is below 1.0, the virus will stop spreading.

As for my family hell 90% of us are supposedly at risk, our elderly mother lives with us, we wash our hands wear masks when going somewhere, she still has doctors appointments she must go too occasionally. We even had an elderly uncle hospitalized 4 days with COVID but he is fine now.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Salander
Is it really rational to believe what CDC says? After all the errors they've made so far?

This is really all about power and politics and money. It is NOT about public health.


Regardless of who believed what. They shut the whole world down because of asymptomatic carriers.

Without asymptomatic carriers, only the sick would of needed to be quarantined.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Maybe they are already found whatever they were looking for and now tappering off.?

This is some hyper overdrive speculation but, this short article is damn interesting!

BOMBSHELL: WHO Coronavirus PCR Test Primer Sequence is Found in All Human DNA



The sequence “CTCCCTTTGTTGTGTTGT” is an 18-character primer sequence found in the WHO coronavirus PCR testing protocol document. The primer sequences are what get amplified by the PCR process in order to be detected and designated a “positive” test result. It just so happens this exact same 18-character sequence, verbatim, is also found on Homo sapiens chromosome 8!


Suppose, those who began to notice the strangeness of the tests for the virus, and how they might be used to collect human DNA, and possibly, covertly insert things into people's nasal cavity, may have had a point, and then some. Again, assuming the article to be true, and given the vast amount of "positive" tests, are we really witnessing "false positives" that are, in fact, genuine in the sense that the patient is being shown to be human? Could this be why there is such an emphasis on testing everyone and a world-wide draconian lockdown?

Think about all those DNA collection houses that sprung up like Ancestry.com and 23andMe and now this mass push to get everyone tested. Might be a covert way of searching for specific Holy Grail bloodline(s) or people that look fully homo sapiens sapiens, but are not. The virus which is real but just a common flu is actually selling fear in order to persuade people to get tested under the guise of the plandemic, they're really looking for something, or rather, someone else.

Taking it to a Chris Carter X-Files episode might mean "testing negative" could be interpreted by the crazier types, as testing not negative for the virus, but negative for humanity.



Or maybe they're tappering off the testing after realizing this plandemic is not working out as planned...Until the next one...




posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
More Democrat tricks and injections of confusion 😎


CNN and MSNBC are livid over these guideline changes.

Solid gold!



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: putnam6



Something is up, is it more political or biological?


Oh, this is political, it's always been political since it's an election year.


Exactly right. If you notice the media quit talking to Dr Fauci after he said the virus is not bad enough to Warrant voting by mail.. with the exception of senior citizens.

They walked away from Dr Birx after she said the CDC is inflating the death count by 25%.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:28 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6




We even had an elderly uncle hospitalized 4 days with COVID but he is fine now.


That's good to hear.

What this is really about is alleviate responsibility for a Covid clean environment in work places, like meat packing plants, and schools. IF they don't have to test workers, students, teachers, cafeteria workers on some kind of systematic bases, then they don't have to isolate positive people that might infect the others.


edit on 26-8-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:31 PM
link   
The Department of Justice is launching an investigation into governors who murdered people in nursing homes.

twitter.com...




posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:34 PM
link   
And yet there's this... Asymptomatic Children Carry Higher COVID-19 Viral Load Than Adults In ICUs, Study Finds

There's no good reason to not test people. If anything we only stand to learn more.



posted on Aug, 26 2020 @ 04:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: 1947boomer

originally posted by: chr0naut
a reply to: putnam6

Because now they have the results of hundreds of thousands of tests which have shown very few asymptomatic people have tested positive?

Nope. The in the article, the CDC admits that approximately 40% of cases are asymptomatic even though the infected individual can still spread the virus.


Yes, but are asymptomatic people who don't normally cough and sneeze, actually likely to spread the virus in real-world situations?




top topics



 
22
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join