It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Video: Rioter repeatedly says shoot me n-word and gets shot in the head

page: 22
43
<< 19  20  21    23  24 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:10 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ththema

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Ththema

If someone even punches your car you can shoot them.

Where did you hear that self defense is only viable when the enemy has weapons?

Fists are deadly weapons like swords or guns.

If you came up on me on the street thinking you can hit me with a skateboard I'll put one between the eyes Holmes.

I have a broken spine you could kill or paralyze me just pushing me down.

I'd rather just shoot.
Thankfully it's legal to protect me.


You have very little to no understanding of self-defense law in the United States.

Where are you local to?


I definitely know my rights.

1 punch can kill me.
So I can shoot you if you touch me.




posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:18 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

I need to point this out about the USSR and PRC:

I cannot find any evidence of any able bodied ppl getting paid to sit on their ass.

In fact, the opposite is true it appears.

They even went 11years with no weekend in Russia. It was work work work and the top set your wages and offered bonuses to get you to try harder.

I don't see any huge welfare initiatives but I do see mass slavery...

If those Soviets aren't "Communist" than what the hell is a Communist?

It's one of those pies in the sky that gets turned into a nightmare the moment someone comes to power to initiate communism. It takes the form of tyranny not liberation...

Did Carl Marx talk about safety nets (disability, unemployment, etc) or free health care? Anyone know?

Im curious. I smell some BS and am now looking into this....
edit on 8/29/2020 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: Ththema

Well, that sheds a lot of light on what's wrong in Chiraq.

If a gang approaches my family van and just starts lighting us up, I can pull on them. That's justifiable homicide. Everybody knows that.

If you're one of the first hit, you won't be pulling on anyone. That's the problem.

In my world, if a gang shows up and threatens my family in any way (hurling insults, threatening them, surrounding them, waving firearms, possessing blunt force objects, etc.) I will start perforating them. Better tried by twelve than carried by six, although around here I doubt the police would bat an eye. The result? We don't have gangs. Since we don't have gangs, we don't have nearly the murder rate. Since we don't have nearly the murder rate, we all tend to get along. Since we all tend to get along, the cops don't generally get as trigger-happy and we don't have nearly the number of police shootings.

In your world, the gangs learn to shoot good, since they get the first shot. I'd estimate in 90+% of shootings, the one with the first shot survives.

I like my way better.

TheRedneck


Your world is a fantasy world.

In the real world, gangs kill gangs.

In fact, in my 21 total years in Chicago, I only know of one incident on the west side, of a GD killing a white girl.

That person was promptly executed.

Obviously, stray bullets are quite common, that's another story.

But your gang threat scenario is fantasy. The suburban mob threat and Antifa is also a fantasy.

Disaffected youth, weak, fat, soft children are looting. It's a #ing problem, but it's not a black white democrat republican problem.

It's a bunch of kids with coiled up energy and no culture but Netflix and Call of Duty to guide them.

They're depressed, anxious, and addled with substance abuse.



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:23 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash


Your friend sounds like a mild story too.

That is the sad part. He was one example that happened to be close to me.

Everyone in the neighborhood tried to help him. At the time, my mother was talking about having the driveway repaved. I went to her and asked about the boy doing it, to get him his first job. She agreed. At the funeral, I told him "I know you're grieving; take a few days to get your head together and when you're ready, call me. I can help you get get started with what your daddy left you."

He could have charged about any halfway reasonable price and gotten the job. We would have fronted part of the money to help him get started, or just do it on a cost plus. If he messed up, we would have worked with him to get it right. It was the perfect first job. All he had to do was call, or just show up. He was less than a mile away.

Nope. I checked with his uncle on him after a week. He had already started selling the equipment. He sold a dozer that was easily worth $30k for $1500. He even tried to sell his uncle's tractor; his uncle caught the buyer as he started to load it. He had easily over $20k worth of mature straight cedar on his homeplace; he "sold" it for $1000 to a guy after he sold the land.

And still, like you say, he was a mild case. I know of one guy who wound up shooting his own mother because he wanted drug money from her and she refused him. He'll never see daylight again. Had he been legally eligible for the death penalty, the state would have fried him.

I can't count how many have ODed, or worse, have taken a gun to their own head. That will mess up an entire family.

Even worse, I have friends inside the Sheriff's Department. They all tell me the same thing: they are not allowed to make major meth busts unless they get authorization. Why? Because the county gets Federal money to fight the meth problem! They have to make a certain number of arrests to keep their funding, but they also have to continue to have a meth problem as well. Just another example of a law that does the opposite of its intention.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Ththema

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Ththema

If someone even punches your car you can shoot them.

Where did you hear that self defense is only viable when the enemy has weapons?

Fists are deadly weapons like swords or guns.

If you came up on me on the street thinking you can hit me with a skateboard I'll put one between the eyes Holmes.

I have a broken spine you could kill or paralyze me just pushing me down.

I'd rather just shoot.
Thankfully it's legal to protect me.


You have very little to no understanding of self-defense law in the United States.

Where are you local to?


I definitely know my rights.

1 punch can kill me.
So I can shoot you if you touch me.


Thats called having a glass jaw.

Also that's not the law. The law expects you to be reasonable.



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:33 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

I actually know of no one in the USA who is able bodied and drawing Disability. Welfare, that's another story entirely, and I'm sure there are some able-bodied people on Disability, but I simply don't know of any.

I do know some who struggle through to try and earn enough for food because their Disability claim is still outstanding after several years. One friend worked for a few years with two bad knees; his company took pity on him because he had so much seniority. He couldn't apply for Disability because he was employed, and he couldn't take time off because he couldn't live long enough on his savings to get the claim through.

I think I should mention, just to educate some certain people who might be reading, that I have always advocated a social safety net for the needy, starting with the first day I joined this site, when I was making some pretty good coin driving. I never thought at the time I would be advocating that for myself, but hey, life is what it is.

I'm interested to know what you find.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 12:53 AM
link   
a reply to: Ththema

Well, a post that actually makes some sense. Thank you.

But your gang threat scenario is fantasy. The suburban mob threat and Antifa is also a fantasy.

No, it's not a fantasy; the videos are real. That was a real mob chasing a 17-year-old boy down the street. That was a real mob beating the crap out of Andy Ngo. Those were real mobs that have pulled people out of their cars and started beating them down.

Antifa is real, and they are NOT "anti-fascist." They are the fascists. BLM is real, and they do not believe black lives matter. They believe their lives matter and no one else's. That is crystal clear for anyone who looks.


Disaffected youth, weak, fat, soft children are looting. It's a #ing problem, but it's not a black white democrat republican problem.

I would replace the word "disaffected" with "entitled," but yes, I agree in principle. It is not a Democrat/Republican thing; it is a crime/justice thing. In a perfect world, these riots would be put down by the police, hopefully early so as to minimize the chance of people being shot. Unfortunately that time is long past and it will take some extreme actions by the police (or, if an insurrection is declared, the military) to quell the uprising.

It also has nothing to do with race. Nothing. From what i have seen, most of the rioters are actually white (or at least light-skinned).


It's a bunch of kids with coiled up energy and no culture but Netflix and Call of Duty to guide them.

They're depressed, anxious, and addled with substance abuse.

On this I can agree completely. The virus shutdowns have made our whole country on edge. People were not designed to sit indoors all day away from social interaction, and that especially applies to young folk. Plus, they have the media forcing lies down their throats day after day until they actually believe them. Just like you seem to actually believe Trump has cut Disability... that's a lie that you have undoubtedly been fed for so long you believe it.

That's where I place blame on the Democrat leaders. They are promoting the lies, and they are the ones implementing the harshest shutdowns. No, it's not a Democrat/Republican problem, but it is being exacerbated by the Democrat leaders much more than by Republican leaders.

Oh, and I am not a Republican. I have never been a Republican. I cannot foresee a circumstance where I will become a Republican. I am an Independent American who is calling things as I see them. I hold no allegiance to either party.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 02:11 AM
link   
a reply to: muzzleflash

Marx wrote extensively on having safety nets for the disabled and elderly. In his view they were doubly disadvantaged in politics and economics as they produced much less and consumed much less than the average person with pure capitalist sytems only interested in serving high production-high consumption people.

Marxism is a system of high morals and values for a fairer society but it's completely incompatible with basic human behaviour and biology. Aspects of it have been applied in the West with great success and massively improved the wellbeing and rights of disabled and elderly.

Under the USSR and Communism disabled and the elderly were deliberately targetted and exploited. A lot of disabled people were experimented on against their will and forcibly sterilised - though worth noting the same practice took place in the USA up until the late 70s with chemical castration and locking the disabled in asylums/prisons rather than treating them as human.



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 02:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Ththema

Reasonable...


I'm walking down the street with my family. Ahead I spot a large crowd of mostly young people making a lot of noise. I keep walking. They are talking (loudly) among themselves, but are not paying me or my family any attention. I feel scared, so I pull out my gun and start shooting. That is not reasonable; I had no clear reason to suspect that the crowd meant me or mt family any harm.

I'm walking down the street with my family. Ahead i spot a large crowd of mostly young people making a lot of noise. I keep walking. They are talking (loudly) and suddenly several of them turn to look at us and I hear things like "Hey, mama, got something for you!" "I bet the old man can't handle her anyway." "Who cares? I can take him out." "I think I'm gonna get me some of that." My family and I turn around and start walking away. The crowd follows us, still talking about harming us. I pull my gun and warn them away. They keep coming. I start letting lead fly. That is reasonable; I had a clear indication that I or my family was about to be attacked by a mob that could overpower us.


I'm driving home from work. Suddenly I find myself looking at a street full of people. They are holding signs and chanting. I put the car in reverse and back away, find a place to turn around, and go home using another route. That is reasonable.

I'm driving home from work. Suddenly I find myself looking at a street full of people. They are holding signs and chanting. I pull out my gun and lay it on the dash in full view as I slowly move through the crowd. Someone bangs into the side of my car. I roll down the window and shoot in the direction of the bump. That is not reasonable; I had no reason to suspect from one bump out of my line of sight that I was under attack.

I'm driving home from work. Suddenly I find myself looking at a street full of people. They are holding signs and chanting. I pull out my gun and lay it on the dash in full view as I slowly move through the crowd. Someone bangs into the side of my car. Someone else jumps on the hood of my car and kicks at my windshield. I hear more banging and look over to see people beating on my car. I roll down my window and start shooting. The crowd scatters for a moment, and I take the chance to get away as fast as I can. That is reasonable; I was being attacked and was unable to flee.


I start home from work. As I leave the parking garage I see a group of people loudly chanting and blocking the exit. I have no other way to exit the garage. I call the police and wait. After several minutes of patiently waiting (and I am talking on terms of thirty/forty minutes, not 4 or 5), I realize the police are not coming. I start out of the garage and the crowd attacks my car, beating on it. I pull out a gun and floor the gas, running over several of the crowd. The car stalls finally from the weight of the bodies attacking it. I open the door, jump out, and start firing into the crowd. That is reasonable; I was under attack.

I start home from work. As I leave the parking garage I see a group of people loudly chanting and blocking the exit. I have no other way to exit the garage. I call the police and wait. After several minutes of patiently waiting (and I am talking on terms of thirty/forty minutes, not 4 or 5), I realize the police are not coming. I start out of the garage and the crowd slowly parts to let me through. I get scared and impatient because this is taking too long so I gun the car, running over several in the crowd. The car stalls from the weight of the bodies I hit with it. I jump out of the car and start firing into the crowd. That is not reasonable; the crowd was giving way, albeit slowly, and I had no reason to feel I was in imminent danger.


In all of the above situations, the difference between reasonable and not reasonable is based on what the crowd did. In order to use deadly force, a person must reasonably believe they are in imminent danger of their lives or serious injury. Reasonable does not refer to the amount of force used as much as it does the reason force was used. Was the belief of being in danger reasonable? If so, then it is difficult legally to state that any force used is unreasonable because the force has become necessary due solely to the actions of the ones force was used against.

Unreasonable force would be in response to a less then deadly threat, i.e. someone is throwing snowballs at you. Then deadly force use is unreasonable because there is no imminent threat of death or serious injury. In that case, yes, you could respond by throwing snowballs back; you could not respond by throwing bricks, because that is not a similar use of force. But that is a completely different subject than deadly force use. The law changes gears when one reasonably believes themselves to be in imminent danger of death or serious injury.

There is no legal requirement to match force with force in such circumstances. I do not have to wait until the dude coming at me with a saber also pulls a gun for me to pull a gun; the sabre is deadly and that is sufficient. If I am old and feeble, someone charging at me in a threatening manner who is young, strong, and twice my size is placing me in fear of my life or serious injury; I can legally blow his fool head off.


Back to the legalities of this case: The boy had as much right to be in the area as anyone else. He was threatened by a man who was agitated and angry, shouting angry threats, and who was apparently holding an incendiary device of some sort. He was moving in and out toward the boy, who was also surrounded by several other people who apparently knew the guy who was threatening him. In that case, he had a reasonable cause to be in fear for his life or serious injury. He was then legally able to defend himself with whatever force he felt was necessary... in this case a rifle. He did not just fire into a crowd; he took aim at the imminent threat and neutralized that, then attempted to leave the scene to avoid further confrontation.

Now, I will admit that if the DA can prove that the shooter initiated the incident somehow, that changes the entire dynamic. He would then be guilty of murder, likely second degree (recklessly and knowingly causing death to another), possibly first degree (premeditated). I have not seen any indication of such, though.

He was then knocked to the ground by a pursuer. Two men caught up to him and took an aggressive stance. One of them raised a blunt object, in this case a skateboard, to use as a club. The boy was then again in fear of his life or serious injury, and again he specifically targeted and neutralized the threat. Whether or not he started the initial confrontation is irrelevant; the situation was over and he had retreated.

Another man came up holding a pistol and took an aggressive stance. The boy then fired another round and neutralized the target. He then left the scene and was able to escape.

At no time did the boy react to a lack of threat. At no time did the boy make an obvious attempt to escalate a threat into a deadly force situation. At no time did the boy fire wildly or wantonly. In each case, the boy responded with deadly force to a reasonable belief (a belief that a reasonable person might have in the same situation) that he was about to be injured or killed. Therefore, his response was reasonable based on the above.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 02:28 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion


Marxism is a system of high morals and values for a fairer society but it's completely incompatible with basic human behaviour and biology. Aspects of it have been applied in the West with great success and massively improved the wellbeing and rights of disabled and elderly.

THANK YOU!

I have been saying something very similar to that for years! Hopefully someone will listen to you.

Marxism will not work, but some aspects of it can (should) be incorporated into society. Socialism is not a bad thing in itself; it only becomes bad for society when it grows to the extent that it interferes with the basic capitalistic processes inherent in society due to human nature.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 07:22 AM
link   
The second video in this feed shows what started the skirmish. The first guy that was killed was one of the pushing a dumpster that is on fire. He wasn't happy when his act of arson was foiled.

videos

It is hard to tell who put out the dumpster fire but the video below has a segment that shows Kyle running by with a fire extinguisher at that same gas station.


edit on 29-8-2020 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 07:45 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

I'm going to find my police chief here and go press the case with him.

I'll tell him im ready to reveal evidence they purposely ignore meth to get funding.

It's a bluff but no one can see thru my bluffs lol.



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 08:06 AM
link   
a reply to: bastion

Thank you for responding. I'm not going to read any of Marx's work any time soon. Manifestos aren't really my thing.

I honestly believe that there are still many disabled being locked in disgusting asylums and tortured drugged or tested on.

I know this as a fact because I got locked up in Tennessee over bogus bs and they put me in MTMHI, a modern place for loonies, due to my ATS posts.

What I saw them do to people in there was TERRIFYING. They'd tackle someone and hold them down and inject chemicals in them that made them into zombies... Never normal again.

This old Korean man was teaching me his language and culture for a week, very nice funny guy in there cuz his wife needed him outta the way to bang this other fool right?

Anyways one day he told the nurse "go F yourself nazis" and they tackled him and injected him with the brain killer. He was a drooling Zombie till I was discharged.

I convinced them to show me the papers on these drugs and it was unbelievable. This stuff has to be mixed with an agent that prevents the allergic reaction as it'd straight kill ANYONE from a reaction.

I'm like "they're putting death chemicals in humans without their permission to attack their brain and nervous system functions? Cuz they said "F off"?

They were still doing electroshock therapy in Texas in 1998 I know I saw a small boy get it. He was like 12 or something.

We still live in a nightmare.

PS- I was the only person discharged from MTMHI after a 30day forced eval with no diagnosis and I took no drugs tho they offered me all sorts including medical grade coca and opiates. I just dont need drugs man...

The doctors claimed Im the "model patient" and proof that not everyone immediately gets violated. They didn't touch so I agree that's weird. They were like "he is misunderstood and his writing is brilliant" and "he has a heart of gold" etc. Both panels of 12 ppl went off on me cuz I beat the system at every turn.

Was not easy and I felt like I was an inch away from being medically raped with needles and my brain destroyed. That's scary cuz my brain is operating well and any major chemical that could damage this operation scares the living # out of me because all my power derives from that organ.

Oh yeah I got sidetracked.

Thanks for confirming Marx did mention safety nets (and that IRL the Soviets did the exact opposite and murdered and tortured them).



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 08:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: Grimpachi
The second video in this feed shows what started the skirmish. The first guy that was killed was one of the pushing a dumpster that is on fire. He wasn't happy when his act of arson was foiled.

videos

It is hard to tell who put out the dumpster fire but the video below has a segment that shows Kyle running by with a fire extinguisher at that same gas station.



Thanks for sharing the vid.
Interesting analysis.

They are gonna turn this kid into a hero and go # up these rioters and probably just any loud mouth Dim will become hunted as traitors.

It may take for Trump to win again first before they riot hard enough to get the militias out to mow em down.

This is the end of America and the beginning of something much more.... Sinister....
edit on 8/29/2020 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 08:42 AM
link   
Whoever behind the scenes concocted this conspiracy unfolding before our eyes was brilliant.

They actually brainwashed people so horrendously we are all like "wow it's suddenly legal to do mass executions!" that's how huge of a turd the Dims are now. They justify being shot just by opening their mouth.

That's a hard core bad ass conspirator that set this up.

He got us so full of hate and anger and so fed up with all this garbage that even I cannot fully overcome the programming mind control.

I'm like one the most pacifist loving sympathetic and empathic caring persons you'll meet and despite my great discipline and patience even I find myself wanting to just see ppl die.

But that's not me. I don't wish evil on others NOT EVEN MY ENEMYS!! So I know this is mind control. They are trying to turn ppl like me to hate and for a big purge.

But I'm not weak and though I'm stupid I ain't that stupid.

Im not gonna wish for death again but guys you gotta realize they GOT ALL OF US WANTING TO KILL EACH OTHER!!!
edit on 8/29/2020 by muzzleflash because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ththema

originally posted by: muzzleflash

originally posted by: Ththema

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: Ththema

If someone even punches your car you can shoot them.

Where did you hear that self defense is only viable when the enemy has weapons?

Fists are deadly weapons like swords or guns.

If you came up on me on the street thinking you can hit me with a skateboard I'll put one between the eyes Holmes.

I have a broken spine you could kill or paralyze me just pushing me down.

I'd rather just shoot.
Thankfully it's legal to protect me.


You have very little to no understanding of self-defense law in the United States.

Where are you local to?


I definitely know my rights.

1 punch can kill me.
So I can shoot you if you touch me.


Thats called having a glass jaw.

Also that's not the law. The law expects you to be reasonable.



What is this? Internet privilege day at the ‘special people’ home?



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 11:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: DeathSlayer

Right now those terrorist can enjoy the killing ....until Trump gets reelected.... once that's done Trump will jump into action. The Demorats just don't get it.....this is what will get Trump reelected and then he will drop the hammer......and ALL of this will stop overnight...

Any bets?


Why doesnt he drop the hammer now? Is this an election strategy? Let people die so he can get re-elected? I don't think you thought this through. Btw, I predicted this would happen over 2 years ago.


www.reddit.com...


"Trump will undoubtedly incite all of his supporters to violence once his Presidency is legitimately threatened"
Why Trump, Facing Impeachment, Warns of Civil War
www.newyorker.com...
Armed Militias Are Taking Trump’s Civil War Tweets Seriously
www.lawfareblog.com...
"He'll claim election rigging or something."
Trump spreads new lies about foreign-backed voter fraud, stoking fears of a 'rigged election' this November
www.cnn.com...
Trump suggests delaying election, warns mail-in ballots to result in ‘INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT’ vote
www.foxnews.com...
"Conversely, we might see the liberals be the ones who initiate the violence instead due to the media whipping everyone up in a frenzy of outrage which will only boil over and explode at some point. Either way, major conflict in the streets due to the citizens themselves taking action is coming."
Cities impose curfews, National Guard mobilizes as U.S. faces another night of unrest after George Floyd killing
www.cnbc.com...
U.S. crisis deepens as protests erupt over police brutality amid deadly pandemic and record unemployment
www.cnbc.com...
"What happens next will largely depend on how much the military and police support him."
Police groups endorsing Trump for 2020
www.nbcnews.com...
www.cbsnews.com...
Police Departments across America have been infiltrated by White Supremacists
www.theguardian.com...
"If it isn't Trump, I'm guessing people will be clamoring for Obama to take a 3rd term."
Third term for Obama? Washington Post reporter claims lawmakers 'talking about' repeal of 22nd Amendment
www.foxnews.com...
"In Christianity, the temple is the human body. So Trump doesn't necessarily have to be in some Jewish temple when he calls himself God for this prophecy to come true."
Trump tweets quote calling him the "second coming of God" to Jews in Israel
www.cbsnews.com...
"The common Christian belief is that the Antichrist makes a 7 year peace deal with Israel and the rest of the Middle East"
Trump announces 'Historic Peace Agreement' between Israel, UAE
www.foxnews.com...
Donald Trump's Middle East peace plan: The Israeli-Palestinian situation explained
www.bbc.com...



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: HighasAkite

Been lots of predictions...

From concentration camps to world war 3. From Russian plots and plans to secret indictments that would see the President "frog marched" out of the WH. None of those things have happened.

The only side provoking civil war is the alt-radical zealot extremist domestic terrorist left.

No, Republicans won't legalize drugs or legislate away hurt feelings. But we will responsibily continue to LEAD this country down a Just and moral path, that honors our founding, honors our way of life and honors OUR PEOPLE (Americans). A culture that values STRENGTH over submission, TRUTH over emotion and FACT over fiction.
edit on 8/29/2020 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Ththema



Thats called having a glass jaw.

And?..your point? I can think of 4 or 5 people in news in the last few years, killed or crippled after one punch, usually in a bar.



posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 03:25 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

Not frog marched but fumigated.

Did anyone catch NEW NORTHCOM COG COMMANDER was sworn in! Gen. Glen David Vanherck is now in charge as Gen. O'Shaughnessy retires. This may be very significant. Re: Pelosi’s statement on “fumigating him out of the WhiteHouse” and that she’s in “regular meetings” with COG. Hopefully, he's loyal to Trump!

Gen. VanHerck takes command of NORAD, USNORTHCOM



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 19  20  21    23  24 >>

log in

join