It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
there are a lot of people on this site claiming that any rioters or protesters should be immediately killed. Many of them gleefully looking forward to their opportunity to mete out justice on the "animals".
Let's say I'm stealing your hubcaps and you come outside.
Shoot first, ask questions later?
Actually, the only thing you got right is that I called them animals. And was rightfully called on it! Animals are typically much less violent for violence's sake than these "things" and generally do not knowingly do things that will get them all dead.
originally posted by: ketsuko
I will once again stress that if we had local officials who were worth a damn, none of this would be happening. But the elected officials at the state and local level chose to abdicate their duty, and this is the type of chaos that happens as a result.
Where were the local cops? Where were the state troopers? Where were the National Guard?
Absence of these elements in force enforcing law and order opened the door to this.
originally posted by: a325nt
Part of me wants it to keep going until the major cities are all on fire and cannot function.
High population density is a huge problem for our species and country, and a bunch of idiots acting like locusts will only serve to get them killed.
The antifa/blm crowd has spent the past couple weeks standing around a bunch of guys holding guns, taunting them, testing them...... one even walked right down the middle of the sturgis rally, thousands of ""bikers" surrounding them, kicked a guys scooter and walked away, not ran, he walked away unhurt.
They came to realize that all these people holding guns... had no intention of using them.
So when they saw the guys with guns guarding peoples businesses..... they believed 100%, that no one would shoot them.
So they went for the weakest... a kid. .. Just like the lions on National Geographic and every other predator.
The lions would have feasted on him, no differently that the guy a couple weeks ago trying to assist the tranny they were harassing and got beaten just short of death.
originally posted by: frogs453
originally posted by: panoz77
originally posted by: Ththema
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: Ththema
RIOTERS WHO ARE IN THE ACT OF VIOLENCE SHOULD BE SHOT ON SIGHT THOUGH
So, someone who shows violence to a window deserves a bullet in the head.
And you're not a fascist? Cool story!
Why do you even write?
In my opinion, active shooters should have their heads stomped on. People who break windows should be prosecuted for breaking windows.
Is there anyone remotely intelligent on the right wing side who can hold a discussion?
I do not have a side. I go with the side who is the best fit for president each time. Clinton was a unlikable whore. Also Attacking a poster is against TnC by the way.
Trying to change the government by violence is TERRORISM. the NADA allows for the killing of terrorist no matter where they are. Police legally shoot people in process of a crime.
If they declare martial law and the city in insurrection it is perfectly fine to shoot terrorist/rioters lawfully because they are endangering the public.
And keeping with your sentiment,lets go into these gang neighborhoods and stomp them all to death. if you really want to go that far we have to apply it to everyone who is a known gang member as well.
That's incorrect. Terrorism is simply political violence against civilians.
Kyle Rittenhouse is a terrorist. Period. He crossed state lines in support of a political cause, and murdered two unarmed civilians of the political opposition. That's called terrorism.
Police cannot just legally shoot someone in the process of a crime, also completely fabricated.
Anyways yes, the correct thing to do is disarm and kill if necessary all active shooters, regardless of who or where.
That's why those men who died trying to disarm Rittenhouse are heroes.
Not complicated stuff.
How are you so sure he wasn't defending himself, the video is not conclusive either way. There are little facts, other than what can be clearly seen. A man was running towards him, who earlier was being very aggressive. Self defense is certainly going to be the argument, also, when they others who were shot were trying to curb stomp him and he shot, again, pretty clear self defense situation and reasonable fear of life in a riot situation.
Clear this up for me then. Everyone here believes someone should be killed if they are destroying property, but if someone who has a different political viewpoint chases a man who just killed someone, then their own death is their own fault due to self defense. So it would be ok to beat him up if he broke a window, but not because he killed someone?
In that case if one of the Patriots shoots a looter and he is only slightly wounded, he can kill the Patriot because, self defense and fear for his life?