It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kim Jung Un is in a coma ?

page: 3
17
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:17 PM
link   
Kim Jong Un is now Kim Jong Ill, again?




posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Arizonaguy

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


Body shaming...that will cost you 5 social credits and 2 demerits.


Take my stars, too.

I ain't into all this PC garbage. I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS. Where one newsletter doesn't go they all don't go.

He's still a #. That happens to be a fat one. An Asian Pillsbury


Come on.
When did the USPS dissolve?


I never said it had.

Definitely some REEEEEEEEEE with that comment, lol.


"I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

You didn't?


Where did I say it had been dissolved?


I quoted what you wrote.


I saw that quote. Did I say it had actually been dissolved?


The way you wrote it? Yes.


Oh, the "way" I wrote it, but not what I actually wrote, that it had been dissolved.

Got it.


Why are you so argumentative? Your words: "made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

Anyone that has a rudimentary understanding of the English language knows that is past-tense, as if it already happened.

Which also has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un, but I know you had to put a slam against Trump in there somewhere. It's your duty, right?




posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:23 PM
link   

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Arizonaguy

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


Body shaming...that will cost you 5 social credits and 2 demerits.


Take my stars, too.

I ain't into all this PC garbage. I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS. Where one newsletter doesn't go they all don't go.

He's still a #. That happens to be a fat one. An Asian Pillsbury


Come on.
When did the USPS dissolve?


I never said it had.

Definitely some REEEEEEEEEE with that comment, lol.


"I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

You didn't?


Where did I say it had been dissolved?


I quoted what you wrote.


I saw that quote. Did I say it had actually been dissolved?


The way you wrote it? Yes.


Oh, the "way" I wrote it, but not what I actually wrote, that it had been dissolved.

Got it.


Why are you so argumentative? Your words: "made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

Anyone that has a rudimentary understanding of the English language knows that is past-tense, as if it already happened.

Which also has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un, but I know you had to put a slam against Trump in there somewhere. It's your duty, right?



Like I said, REEEEEE.

Of course, what I meant and what I said goes to the heart of comprehension, specifically implication in the way language is used when something is explicitly (or not) said, which is part of my point now that you wanted to argue my humor. But this ain't the thread for that.

Kim Jong Un is a joke. A fat one. Like my comment(s). Phat.


edit on 23-8-2020 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)


(post by DBCowboy removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy




lol



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: musicismagic

originally posted by: Steveogold
a reply to: musicismagic

again lol


Yep I don't think this Android phone likes me at all.


Definitely not the 'droid phone you were looking for.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: ColeYounger

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


lol...He had a Big Mac attack!


Not sure about food safety standards over there, but could be a Big Dog Mac attack.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:53 PM
link   
At least the discrimination mongers can't complain.

He's got an Asian Woman as his "successor" ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
At least the discrimination mongers can't complain.

He's got an Asian Woman as his "successor" ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž


You can't tell nowadays.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 06:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Arizonaguy

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


Body shaming...that will cost you 5 social credits and 2 demerits.


Take my stars, too.

I ain't into all this PC garbage. I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS. Where one newsletter doesn't go they all don't go.

He's still a #. That happens to be a fat one. An Asian Pillsbury


Come on.
When did the USPS dissolve?


I never said it had.

Definitely some REEEEEEEEEE with that comment, lol.


"I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

You didn't?


Where did I say it had been dissolved?


I quoted what you wrote.


I saw that quote. Did I say it had actually been dissolved?


The way you wrote it? Yes.


Oh, the "way" I wrote it, but not what I actually wrote, that it had been dissolved.

Got it.


Why are you so argumentative? Your words: "made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

Anyone that has a rudimentary understanding of the English language knows that is past-tense, as if it already happened.

Which also has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un, but I know you had to put a slam against Trump in there somewhere. It's your duty, right?



Like I said, REEEEEE.

Of course, what I meant and what I said goes to the heart of comprehension, specifically implication in the way language is used when something is explicitly (or not) said, which is part of my point now that you wanted to argue my humor. But this ain't the thread for that.

Kim Jong Un is a joke. A fat one. Like my comment(s). Phat.



There's no Reeeeeeee on my part but you are certainly taking that lead. Questioning my comprehension skills is a laugh, you should be looking at how you compose sentences so they come off the way you're thinking.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Sources in the FBI say the rumors are tracing back to Christopher Steele ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Sources in the FBI say the rumors are tracing back to Christopher Steele ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž



Are South Korean hookers peeing on Kim's bed yet?



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Arizonaguy

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


Body shaming...that will cost you 5 social credits and 2 demerits.


Take my stars, too.

I ain't into all this PC garbage. I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS. Where one newsletter doesn't go they all don't go.

He's still a #. That happens to be a fat one. An Asian Pillsbury


Come on.
When did the USPS dissolve?


I never said it had.

Definitely some REEEEEEEEEE with that comment, lol.


"I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

You didn't?


Where did I say it had been dissolved?


I quoted what you wrote.


I saw that quote. Did I say it had actually been dissolved?


The way you wrote it? Yes.


Oh, the "way" I wrote it, but not what I actually wrote, that it had been dissolved.

Got it.


Why are you so argumentative? Your words: "made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

Anyone that has a rudimentary understanding of the English language knows that is past-tense, as if it already happened.

Which also has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un, but I know you had to put a slam against Trump in there somewhere. It's your duty, right?



Like I said, REEEEEE.

Of course, what I meant and what I said goes to the heart of comprehension, specifically implication in the way language is used when something is explicitly (or not) said, which is part of my point now that you wanted to argue my humor. But this ain't the thread for that.

Kim Jong Un is a joke. A fat one. Like my comment(s). Phat.



There's no Reeeeeeee on my part but you are certainly taking that lead. Questioning my comprehension skills is a laugh, you should be looking at how you compose sentences so they come off the way you're thinking.



I wasn't questioning your comprehension, but the larger issue about language and how it is used, since I never said "The USPS has be dissolved."

But now I might be, since you don't get it.

So yeah, there's a reeeeeee, because the cynicism in my initial post has you coming back. Because you didn't get it.

It's pretty simple, actually.]
edit on 23-8-2020 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen
Sources in the FBI say the rumors are tracing back to Christopher Steele ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž



Are South Korean hookers peeing on Kim's bed yet?


South Korean hooker pee is illegal in North Korea.

But you can still get goat pee and llama pee.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen
Sources in the FBI say the rumors are tracing back to Christopher Steele ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž



Are South Korean hookers peeing on Kim's bed yet?


South Korean hooker pee is illegal in North Korea.

But you can still get goat pee and llama pee.


Hookers are illegal. Unless they pee on Un. Or his sister watches.

So she has to pay one goat and one llama.
edit on 23-8-2020 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:13 PM
link   
Must be true...TMZ is reporting on it. (Sarc. But might be accurate)

TMZ link

Here's a little excerpt for ya.

"Chang Song-min -- a former aide to the late S. Korean President Kim Dae-jung -- recently told South Korean media that, based on intel he'd received, he assessed ol' Kim to be in a coma, but not entirely deceased quite yet."

Ol' Kim wasnt entirely deceased yet lol.
edit on 23-8-2020 by Macenroe82 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Macenroe82
Must be true...TMZ is reporting on it. (Sarc. But might be accurate)

TMZ link


TMZ also reported Kim dead in April.
www.tmz.com...



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Arizonaguy

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


Body shaming...that will cost you 5 social credits and 2 demerits.


Take my stars, too.

I ain't into all this PC garbage. I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS. Where one newsletter doesn't go they all don't go.

He's still a #. That happens to be a fat one. An Asian Pillsbury


Come on.
When did the USPS dissolve?


I never said it had.

Definitely some REEEEEEEEEE with that comment, lol.


"I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

You didn't?


Where did I say it had been dissolved?


I quoted what you wrote.


I saw that quote. Did I say it had actually been dissolved?


The way you wrote it? Yes.


Oh, the "way" I wrote it, but not what I actually wrote, that it had been dissolved.

Got it.


Why are you so argumentative? Your words: "made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

Anyone that has a rudimentary understanding of the English language knows that is past-tense, as if it already happened.

Which also has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un, but I know you had to put a slam against Trump in there somewhere. It's your duty, right?



Like I said, REEEEEE.

Of course, what I meant and what I said goes to the heart of comprehension, specifically implication in the way language is used when something is explicitly (or not) said, which is part of my point now that you wanted to argue my humor. But this ain't the thread for that.

Kim Jong Un is a joke. A fat one. Like my comment(s). Phat.



There's no Reeeeeeee on my part but you are certainly taking that lead. Questioning my comprehension skills is a laugh, you should be looking at how you compose sentences so they come off the way you're thinking.



I wasn't questioning your comprehension, but the larger issue about language and how it is used, since I never said "The USPS has be dissolved."

But now I might be, since you don't get it.

So yeah, there's a reeeeeee, because the cynicism in my initial post has you coming back. Because you didn't get it.

It's pretty simple, actually.]


The downside to the 'net is you often can't tell the meaning of what someone writes because there is no voice inflection or facial gestures to reflect their true meaning.

But as I expected, bringing up what you wrote triggered you in a major way. I didn't expect you to get personal though, that's a disappointment.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen
Sources in the FBI say the rumors are tracing back to Christopher Steele ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿšฌ๐Ÿ˜Ž



Are South Korean hookers peeing on Kim's bed yet?



But you can still get goat pee and llama pee.


Ah...so NORTH Korean hookers.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: HalWesten

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Arizonaguy

originally posted by: Liquesence
Probably a food coma, the fat # that he is.


Body shaming...that will cost you 5 social credits and 2 demerits.


Take my stars, too.

I ain't into all this PC garbage. I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS. Where one newsletter doesn't go they all don't go.

He's still a #. That happens to be a fat one. An Asian Pillsbury


Come on.
When did the USPS dissolve?


I never said it had.

Definitely some REEEEEEEEEE with that comment, lol.


"I subscribe to the "# your feelings" newsletter made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

You didn't?


Where did I say it had been dissolved?


I quoted what you wrote.


I saw that quote. Did I say it had actually been dissolved?


The way you wrote it? Yes.


Oh, the "way" I wrote it, but not what I actually wrote, that it had been dissolved.

Got it.


Why are you so argumentative? Your words: "made even greater by the dissolution of the USPS"

Anyone that has a rudimentary understanding of the English language knows that is past-tense, as if it already happened.

Which also has nothing to do with Kim Jong Un, but I know you had to put a slam against Trump in there somewhere. It's your duty, right?



Like I said, REEEEEE.

Of course, what I meant and what I said goes to the heart of comprehension, specifically implication in the way language is used when something is explicitly (or not) said, which is part of my point now that you wanted to argue my humor. But this ain't the thread for that.

Kim Jong Un is a joke. A fat one. Like my comment(s). Phat.



There's no Reeeeeeee on my part but you are certainly taking that lead. Questioning my comprehension skills is a laugh, you should be looking at how you compose sentences so they come off the way you're thinking.



I wasn't questioning your comprehension, but the larger issue about language and how it is used, since I never said "The USPS has be dissolved."

But now I might be, since you don't get it.

So yeah, there's a reeeeeee, because the cynicism in my initial post has you coming back. Because you didn't get it.

It's pretty simple, actually.]


The downside to the 'net is you often can't tell the meaning of what someone writes because there is no voice inflection or facial gestures to reflect their true meaning.

But as I expected, bringing up what you wrote triggered you in a major way. I didn't expect you to get personal though, that's a disappointment.



Yeah, not my fault you didn't get the larger context of what I said, which was my point. That's the irony.

But you're the one still trying to save face in misunderstanding what I said.




top topics



 
17
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join