It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Schools Extend Gun Free Zones Into Your Own Home!

page: 6
41
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

In the vast, and I do mean vast, majority of situations...nothing.

Nothing.




posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 03:35 PM
link   
My (homeschooled) kids and I think someone needs to dress up as Pennywise and just stand off to the side behind their kid in a shadowy spot, and move a bit once in a while.

Lol, I wonder how many teachers would crap themselves over that.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 05:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: ThouArtGod
a reply to: Alien Abduct

Are you honestly asking? The answer is no, it isn’t illegal to have a firearm on the wall. Whose room it is in is arbitrary- it’s not the kid’s house, it’s the parents.

If I want a flamethrower on my kids wall, it’s legal- as long as it is properly stowed, who can argue?


Asking, no. It was a statement, hence the period at the end of the sentence instead of a question mark. Perhaps you were responding to the wrong post.



posted on Aug, 23 2020 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Alien Abduct

I’m so sorry! I honestly have developed some issues lately due to head trauma (I’m in treatment at Walter Reed).

Forgiven?



posted on Aug, 24 2020 @ 01:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: ThouArtGod
a reply to: Alien Abduct

I’m so sorry! I honestly have developed some issues lately due to head trauma (I’m in treatment at Walter Reed).

Forgiven?


Absolutely. Sorry to hear that. I sincerely hope you get better soon.



posted on Aug, 24 2020 @ 08:59 AM
link   
a reply to: StallionDuck

That principal needs to make a public apology and step down from that position pending dismissal.



posted on Aug, 24 2020 @ 12:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: TheRedneck




No one has the right to take personal photos of a child in their home without express permission. No one.


Screenshots are not personal photography. And they were taken of a public (nonprivate) broadcast.


Even in a publicly-streamed display, the streamer retains ownership of the material streamed.


They retain ownership of their material. Screenshots are not protected.


I have to ask this: are you in favor of people taking screenshots of your home without letting you know


If I am streaming/broadcasting it, they have every right to screenshot it.

Which is a reason I don't let peeps into my place, physically or virtually.


Wrong answer. School isn't in the public domain. Look at all of the Principals and Administrators who hide behind "privacy laws" when they screw up.

The teacher took the screenshot as an agent of the School District. That makes it at minimum District property. The teacher was not a photographer, so that doesn't count. (I've always thought it asinine that if I am hired to do an engineering job, the design that I come up with is the property of the entity that hired me, but, if I hire a photographer, the pictures that I paid them to take belong to them)

Anything that the School District has on a student should be open to review by the student's parents or guardian.



posted on Aug, 24 2020 @ 06:26 PM
link   
a reply to: JIMC5499


I've always thought it asinine that if I am hired to do an engineering job, the design that I come up with is the property of the entity that hired me, but, if I hire a photographer, the pictures that I paid them to take belong to them

That's the difference between being an employee and being a private contractor.

TheRedneck



posted on Aug, 25 2020 @ 10:03 AM
link   
a reply to: TheRedneck

I would be a hired contractor. I actually have a side business of 3D heat and flow modeling and supporting equipment that I designed for a company that doesn't exist anymore. If it was steady I'd do it full time. If I hired the photographer to shoot specific pictures (wedding, etc) I should own the right's to those pictures. I have no problem with freelancers owning the rights.



posted on Aug, 27 2020 @ 03:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Dutchowl
a reply to: StallionDuck

That principal needs to make a public apology and step down from that position pending dismissal.



Absolutely. I mean... We've fired teachers and principles for so much less...

But.. These people wont have to answer for it. In their little brains, it's justified. In their little communities, they're justified. In their little democratic mind set.. they're justified.


Yep... Zero tolerance. They should be fired, sued and held accountable.


Democrats want to start holding people accountable. I say they're right and we should start with each and every single one of them. Give them a little taste of their own snake oil.



posted on Aug, 27 2020 @ 04:03 PM
link   
awesome! do it!

a reply to: Nyiah



posted on Aug, 27 2020 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Niece is an IT specialist and the word got to the school that she would be recording her 3 kids classes. The letter said she didn't have permission. Her reply was she was not asking for permission and if they pay for the internet connection then she could not legally record it without their permission. People are now hiring her to set up to record all classes, the school hasn't formally responded yet.




posted on Aug, 29 2020 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: mikell

I mean... PUBLIC is in the name! How can they claim to be private. Its not a private school . Even still...



new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join