It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It just doesn't happen

page: 4
23
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 03:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carsforkids

No.


Well then I guess you have me at a loss.




posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 03:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carsforkids

No.


Well then I guess you have me at a loss.

How unusual.



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 03:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage




Some people think the world is flat. Now that is ridiculous.


You got me there we can agree on somethings.




How unusual.


Ya right.
edit on 22-8-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: TzarChasm

Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.


What exactly did you hear? What is your definition of biological evolution ( presuming you have one)?



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:16 PM
link   
a reply to: Phantom423

I tend to favor notions like this.




In the article, entitled “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories”, Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa.


Source



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:17 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids

Your source:

In making this claim, Muller and Newman are careful to affirm that evolutionary biology has succeeded in explaining how preexisting forms diversify under the twin influences of natural selection and variation of genetic traits.



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Yep I did read it Phage




As it happens, Muller and Newman are not alone in this judgment. In the last decade or so a host of scientific essays and books have questioned the efficacy of selection and mutation as a mechanism for generating morphological novelty, as even a brief literature survey will establish.

edit on 22-8-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:24 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids

So, do you agree or disagree?

Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Not sure really


As it happens, Muller and Newman are not alone in this judgment. In the last decade or so a host of scientific essays and books have questioned the efficacy of selection and mutation as a mechanism for generating morphological novelty, as even a brief literature survey will establish.

edit on 22-8-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids


I tend to favor notions like this.


Cognitive dissonance?



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I certainly wouldn't say that.




posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 04:48 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids



Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.

I thought the topic was evolution. Are you changing the subject?


edit on 8/22/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage




I thought the topic was evolution. Are you changing the subject?


Intelligent design is the topic don't put your confusion on me.

What forum is this?
.
edit on 22-8-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids

Your OP:

What evolution suggests would be the equivalent of throwing the
shards of a broken window in the air and getting a new window.


A source you recently used:

In making this claim, Muller and Newman are careful to affirm that evolutionary biology has succeeded in explaining how preexisting forms diversify under the twin influences of natural selection and variation of genetic traits.



Smells like cognitive dissonance on your part.

edit on 8/22/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I referred to evolution again what forum is this?



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids


Because evolution is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard.


Your source (which you claim to have read);

In making this claim, Muller and Newman are careful to affirm that evolutionary biology has succeeded in explaining how preexisting forms diversify under the twin influences of natural selection and variation of genetic traits.


How do you reconcile these two contradictory ideas?



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Phantom423

I tend to favor notions like this.




In the article, entitled “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories”, Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa.


Source
.

I think it's pretty obvious you are the only one who is so outrageously insulted.



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: carsforkids
a reply to: Phage




I thought the topic was evolution. Are you changing the subject?


Intelligent design is the topic don't put your confusion on me.

What forum is this?
.


I'm pretty sure your topic is "Why aren't people more ticked off about theory of evolution, surely anyone with a brain could see it's all dumb " and you were really low key passive aggressive about it and you act like you weren't trying to attack anyone but we all know what's up.



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You're confused again I said "I tend to favor such notions" as this quote
for cry'n out loud.


In the article, entitled “The Origin of Biological Information and the Higher Taxonomic Categories”, Dr. Meyer argues that no current materialistic theory of evolution can account for the origin of the information necessary to build novel animal forms. He proposes intelligent design as an alternative explanation for the origin of biological information and the higher taxa.


I didn't quote the whole thing.



posted on Aug, 22 2020 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: carsforkids

So you are cherry picking.




top topics



 
23
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join