It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Gulity Plea Expected In Durham Investigation

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 04:33 PM
a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Thanks for that except J&C. Makes sense that he was
working with Strzok, whom personally took it upon himself
to set in motion a coup to "stop" Trump.

I hope that the reason this development came first
is that much of this was already known from the IG report.

I can't imagine this will be the sum total of Durham's investigation.

But I will concede that we have been let down many times,
time will tell. I want to hope right now, I need to hope.

edit on 14-8-2020 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:03 PM
a reply to: carewemust

There is also some decent information here:

Notice that none of the articles use the word "indictment" except the one above?

The MSM will do anything to hide the scandal.

posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:04 PM
a reply to: burntheships

The mainstream media will not be able to hide it for much longer.

William Barr said last night that several indictments will be coming before the November election. And President Trump just now said the same thing from the White House.

posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:10 PM
a reply to: carewemust

I did get the sense from Barr that he has a few
cards to play when he said that. So, it happens
that I do believe him.

I also noticed that they waited until after Biden
announced his VP. Ironic, heels up Harris won't
be able to say much in a believable fashion since
she was a dirty prosecutor herself.

edit on 14-8-2020 by burntheships because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 19 2020 @ 07:46 PM
a reply to: burntheships

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

As expected, Deep State FBI Attorney Kevin Clinesmith plead guilty today.

But it sounds like he is using the Hillary Clinton excuse of being ignorant of the law? Or he was fed bad information?

"I have a hard time with this because basically what he [Clinesmith] says in his allocution, which is where you explain to the judge what you did that makes you guilty, he said that he altered the document but he didn’t intend to deceive anyone," McCarthy explained.

"And a false statement under federal law, it’s not enough that you know you are saying something that’s false, it has to be willful which means you have to have an intention to deceive, an intention to violate the law."

During the plea hearing, Clinesmith was asked to affirm that he "intentionally altered an email, and added language" that "individual number one" was "not a source ... and you knew that statement was in fact not true."

Clinesmith replied, "At the time I thought the information I was providing was accurate, but I am agreeing the information I inserted was not originally there, and I inserted the information."

"What he is trying to do is, he wants to say he didn’t mean to deceive the court, and I think the story is preposterous," McCarthy said.
More at:

posted on Aug, 19 2020 @ 10:40 PM
a reply to: carewemust

If he thought what he added was true...who told him it was true? That's what I would be asking. Someone lied and should be held responsible so if not him...he better roll over and if not then he deserves the punishment for aiding a criminal.

posted on Aug, 20 2020 @ 06:26 AM
So the warrant was fraudulently obtained.

During dnc convention week


The day black nixon made his speech......


top topics

<< 1   >>

log in