It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Teenage Sesame Place employee punched over mask-wearing requirement

page: 4
8
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

That would disqualify many a Walmart shopper.


You have to wear a shirt and shoes underwear not required.




posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:49 PM
link   
a reply to: LABTECH767

Ha. Well certainly no offense to you for naturally getting older and less svelte. And good on you for going after a criminal. And correct, I've made it this far and not gotten hooked on heroin. Not trying to get involved by accident via a junkie scuffle.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

Shoes definitely.
www.peopleofwalmart.com...



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:51 PM
link   
a reply to: LABTECH767

I have a buddy that's a regional loss prevention manager for a large box store. They no longer allow loss prevention team members to even chase after people. He says too much liability. And not only that. The store can afford replace a stolen item. You, not so much.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:52 PM
link   
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

Many a Walmart shopper don't wear pants or underwear. lol



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:53 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580

Then. Um. What's the point?

Just keeping an eye on employees?



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 07:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Well they do detain people. But if the person starts to fight or flee they just let them go. Too much risk.

My buddy and another LP once chased a guy but he pulled a gun on them and went to fire. Luckily enough he didn't have one in the chamber. So yeah. It's safer for everyone to just let some scumbag go than risk anyone's life.

And they definitely do keep an eye on employees. A lot of his time is spent investigating employees he says.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

Shoes definitely.
www.peopleofwalmart.com...


I only see a person, people denotes more than one.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

Many a Walmart shopper don't wear pants or underwear. lol


I guess you got me there men wearing dresses and women showing butt cracks.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:04 PM
link   
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck



I only see a person, people denotes more than one.

Can't fool me. You just want to see more naked Walmart shoppers.

Do your own research.

edit on 8/10/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: grey580




Well they do detain people. But if the person starts to fight or flee they just let them go. Too much risk.

That is reasonable.
edit on 8/10/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: LABTECH767

I have a buddy that's a regional loss prevention manager for a large box store. They no longer allow loss prevention team members to even chase after people. He says too much liability. And not only that. The store can afford replace a stolen item. You, not so much.


That is absolutely correct, if they threaten we are not even supposed to stop them just step back and call the police, in fact security officers can and have been fired for over stepping there boundaries, there are a number of reasons but liability is the biggest, if the guard is told he has to stop them he can then prosecute his employer for injury's and also the shop lifter if injured can also prosecute the store and the guard.

The correct procedure in the UK and probably in the US is if the suspect is possibly dangerous and refuses to comply then to just act as a witness, your safety and the safety of the staff and other members of the general public is paramount, let him take the good's, the money or whatever it is insured, you are just a deterrent and if that has failed then so be it.

I was actually in the wrong chasing that guy but like I said Hot under the collar, I still acted in a manner that rightly could have cost me my job and if he had been injured or I had been then I was uninsured since I was no longer in the store and had chased the suspect - I got a prosecution though after he was caught several week's later.

The local police loved it, fat guard legging it after skinny smack head (heroin addict), almost on top of him outside the store and by the time he reached the railway line were he got away from me he had opened up a lead of about twenty yards, I got the mickey taken out of me for week's by laughing police officers and had to laugh myself when I saw the footage.
edit on 10-8-2020 by LABTECH767 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck



I only see a person, people denotes more than one.

Can't fool me. You just want to see more naked Walmart shoppers.

Do your own research.


Nope just followed your link calling them people when it was a person. I quite looking a naked pictures when I got married.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:38 PM
link   
a reply to: PhilbertDezineck

There are more than one.
And I know you already know this.


edit on 8/10/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Blueracer

I'll go along with that.

That is store management's responsibility, or security. Not some 17 year old kid who has not even graduated High School yet.

Adults should be doing it, not kids.

The Wal-mart in Fort Payne, here in Alabama, uses teenagers to enforce the mask rule. Really? There's always going to be that one person who's going to be provoked by this. Asking a child to deal with that is just asking for trouble.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 08:47 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

The kid dealt with it, reminded him of the rules. Later the jackass decked him.


Asking a child to deal with that is just asking for trouble.
How burly an adult would be appropriate to remind a guest of the rules?

edit on 8/10/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Basically any ol' adult will do, that isn't like 80 years old.

A kid is a bit different than an adult, wouldn't you say??

Maybe that idiot would have decked an adult, maybe not. That's not the point I'm making, which you very well know...kids should not be put in that position.



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: seagull

That's not the point I'm making, which you very well know...kids should not be put in that position.


It's management's fault?

No, I think it's the kid's fault, actually. Yeah, that's it.

No. It's the rule. That's really the problem, isn't it?

No mask rule, no problem. Right?

edit on 8/10/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 09:39 PM
link   
Then he should be given a gun and a gestapo uniform. That's what you're condoning. Papers please. Get in the oven sir. It's mandated.

a reply to: Phage



posted on Aug, 10 2020 @ 09:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Hushabye

No.

"Sir, the rules require that masks be worn. And shoes. And shirts."

But if alcohol is served an ID might be required.

edit on 8/10/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



new topics




 
8
<< 1  2  3    5  6 >>

log in

join