It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Role of US Democrats in the Black Genocide

page: 1
24
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:
+5 more 
posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:15 AM
link   


Recently, I have been reading a lot, including on the ATS forum about the full support of the leadership of the US Democratic Party of the Black Lives Matter Important movement, especially the Clintons. Many commentators cite the ancient fact that the US Democratic Party represented the South of the country, the Confederates in the Civil War, advocated the preservation of slavery and was defeated.

I would like to remind you, distinguished members of the forum, that the decision on slavery and genocide of the black population of the Democratic Party, when it and the country was headed by Bill Clinton, was much closer to us.

In 1994, in the African country of Rwanda, a coup d'etat and a monstrous genocide of the black population of the Tutsi tribe took place. During 4 months of genocide, up to 1 million people were brutally killed. after two months of genocide, when the entire world press was inundated with photographs with mountains of corpses in Rwanda, the State Department of President Bill Clinton responded to the disaster.

U.S State Department spokesperson in 1994 Christine Shelley, describing the situation in Rwanda, over and over again speaks of "acts of genocide", and not of the genocide itself. And when a journalist asks her how many “acts of genocide” are needed to recognize what is happening as just genocide, and whether she has a departmental instruction specifically not to use the term “genocide”, Shelley avoids answering.



You will ask why? Everything is very simple. If you call what is happening simply "genocide", then in accordance with the UN convention of 1948, the United States will be obliged to intervene, while the Democrats and Bill Clinton do not want to interfere. Even if this position killed millions of Africans. US President Bill Clinton and his cabinet were aware of the plans for the complete destruction of Tutsi even before the genocide reached its peak. Later, Clinton regarded US non-intervention in genocide as one of the main failures of the state's foreign policy during his rule, saying that the Americans could hardly have stopped the violence, but they could have reduced its scale, and said that he regretted it.

And now only 25 years have passed, and the same party in the United States, and the same people suddenly become ardent and historical defenders of the black population.

This is very strange to me. And you?




posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:23 AM
link   
a reply to: RussianTroll

I have watched these kinds of things happen over the decades and it really is appalling not only for these great crimes against humanity, but also the social engineering taking place that has affected so many people to be deceived so easily whom still support these kinds of so called leaders.

Even now after this expose' and future ones to come will not change their minds about the people promoting these crimes and those who ignore it including themselves.


+5 more 
posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: RussianTroll

It was black on black killings, that makes it okay with the BLM movement.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:29 AM
link   
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed

The cynicism of democrats in the highest degree (((



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: RussianTroll

It was black on black killings, that makes it okay with the BLM movement.


Who cares who kills blacks - white, yellow, green, or black themselves? In any case, this is the killing of people.


+2 more 
posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:35 AM
link   
a reply to: RussianTroll

The Democratic party has done far more harm to the black community than the kkk could have ever dreamed.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 08:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: RussianTroll
If you call what is happening simply "genocide", then in accordance with the UN convention of 1948, the United States will be obliged to intervene...


And Russia and China and France and the United Kingdom. Any of them show up either? Must hate the blacks too.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: RussianTroll

The Democratic party has done far more harm to the black community than the kkk could have ever dreamed.

The Democrate party is/was the KKK
edit on 3-8-2020 by Quadrivium because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:18 AM
link   
Madeleine Albright - The deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children was worth it for Iraq's non existent WMD's


Has she even been to Iraq? Is it just some numbers on a page to them? Or is that just the plan?



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Quadrivium
The Democrate party is/was the KKK


It's a shame that the Democratic Party at the time of the Klan's founding wasn't more Progressive like their Republican rivals, all into workers rights, anti-big business, higher taxes, voting rights, welfare, pro-national healthcare, anti-lobbyist, pro-minimum wage, pro-inheritance tax, etc.

What happened to our parties!?!?



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

1994 year. Russia was so weak that it could not stop the genocide of Russians in the former Soviet republics. Then the government and the president of Russia were completely under the control of the US State Department; American consultants sat everywhere in the government. I can't imagine how "friend Boris" could go against the opinion of "friend Bill". You would be the first to shout about "Russian aggression".
Only later did Russia become capable of one peacekeeping battalion in the peacekeeping forces in Bosnia and Kosovo. But in 2008, when in South Ossetia, Georgians openly killed Russian citizens and peacekeepers from tanks, artillery and multiple launch rocket systems, after 5 days the Russian army stood near Tbilisi, which caused a wave of fakes and hysteria in the West.

Rwanda was the zone of interests of three countries - Belgium, France and the United States. Of these, only the Belgians, within the framework of the UN peacekeeping force, in the amount of several dozen fighters were present in the country. Only as a guard.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Russia was so weak...


No!!!!! 'Weak Russian?' That's got to be a giant oxymoron since you're all made of Stalinium and vodka.


You would be the first to shout about "Russian aggression".


So you're saying the reason you didn't do your jobs, besides being weaklings, was that you were afraid the United States would call you names? LOL. Sissies.




edit on 3-8-2020 by AugustusMasonicus because: 👁❤🍕



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:25 AM
link   
a reply to: RussianTroll

The same democrats along with EU banks, that colonized most of former Yugoslavia. You think they'd care about an African nation abandoned by the Belgians?

Time to look to what's happening in Ukraine for further up - to - date details. Heavily involving Russia.
edit on 3-8-2020 by strongfp because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Russia was so weak...


No!!!!! 'Weak Russian?' That's got to be a giant oxymoron since you're all made of Stalinium and vodka.


You would be the first to shout about "Russian aggression".


So you're saying the reason you didn't do your jobs, besides being weaklings, was that you were afraid the United States would call you names? LOL. Sissies. [/ quote]


Only now it's the other way around)))
Russians appoint presidents for you

: cheers:
edit on 3-8-2020 by RussianTroll because: (no reason given)

edit on 3-8-2020 by RussianTroll because: correct



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Only now it's the other way around)))
Russians appoint presidents for you


He's what your GRU would call 'a useful idiot'.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: strongfp
a reply to: RussianTroll

The same democrats along with EU banks, that colonized most of former Yugoslavia. You think they'd care about an African nation abandoned by the Belgians?

Time to look to what's happening in Ukraine for further up - to - date details. Heavily involving Russia.


You are right, my friend. the democrats have already destroyed many peoples with their cynicism. Now kindness to the Americans. And the Americans still believe them.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Only now it's the other way around)))
Russians appoint presidents for you


He's what your GRU would call 'a useful idiot'.


Do you have a notarized power of attorney to speak on behalf of the GRU? Please show me.

By the way, the GRU has not been in Russia for a long time. There is a GUGSH RF. Main Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation

edit on 3-8-2020 by RussianTroll because: correct



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:40 AM
link   

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Do you have a notarized power of attorney to speak on behalf of the GRU? Please show me.


Pooty Poot told me last time we spoke over ossetra and Mamont.



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: RussianTroll
Do you have a notarized power of attorney to speak on behalf of the GRU? Please show me.


Pooty Poot told me last time we spoke over ossetra and Mamont.


Я в восторге от ваших фантазий



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: highvein
a reply to: RussianTroll

It was black on black killings, that makes it okay with the BLM movement.


Exactly, BLM is perfectly ok with black on black killings. They have publicly said as much.

You have yet to hear BLM address the 14 black little children shot and many killed in Chicago, or the 150 black people killed in Chicago by other black people this "summer of love". To BLM those black lives don't matter because they deflect from the message of BLM that only black people/children killed by white police matter.

When the black child and black men shot by black BLM members in CHAD/CHAZ Seattle happened if you dared to talk about it, BLM threw a hissy fit. They insisted that these lives didn't matter because they were not killed by a while policeman. BLM said that mentioning these lives as mattering took away from the real message of BLM, and those lives were not black lives that mattered.

BLM has the exact same stance on all other black on black shooting's and murders, there have been thousands in Democratic run cities during this summer of love in not just Chicago but in NYC and other major cities around the nations. Those lives are worthless and don't matter to BLM because they deflect from the "real" message of BLM that the only black lives that matter are those killed by white police.

Remember BLM was formed under the Obama/Biden administration.

Remember in 2016 the Democratic Party at their convention voted to give BLM their full support and brought them into the Democratic Party fold.


Dare I add that an organization founded by a person whose goal was genocide of people of color through stopping them from breeding.

That organization is highly supported by the Democratic Party, Planned Parenthood.

Planned Parenthood has now ended more potential black lives to date than the number of black people who were alive in the US on the day this Democratic Party supported organization was formed.




edit on 8/3/20 by The2Billies because: addition



new topics




 
24
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join