It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But if you are taking money from the future, you don't deplete the available funds in the past or affect anyone else but yourself.
Once you start the cycle, recursion would 1. Destroy the universe, 2. Fill the universe.
Originally posted by dbates
Once you start the cycle, recursion would 1. Destroy the universe, 2. Fill the universe.
I'm sure the alternate timeline theory would fix this problem
Originally posted by dbates
Just a thought that popped into my head somehow.
Let's say that time travel was possible today and you won the lottery enabling you to afford a time machine. You would look back on your past and see that you didn't have the best life. In an effort to change your past you scrap together every last dime you have and travel back in time and give that money to yourself. You also leave yourself with the information ensuring you still win the lottery in the future.
When you once again win the lottery you travel back in time giving yourself all of your money, which is more this second time due to your first visit. In effect each time you travel back in time you would have more money. As a result, the instant you traveled back in time the first time, you would fill the universe with money from all your time travels.
Your first thought is that there's not that much money available. But if you are taking money from the future, you don't deplete the available funds in the past or affect anyone else but yourself. Even if you didn't bring anything with you , the result of all your time machines arriving at the same point in time would fill the universe with an infinite number of time machines. Even if it was only you who traveled back in time, say 5 min, what's to stop yourself from traveling back in time with yourself 5 min from now creating 3 persons in the universe. Once you start the cycle, recursion would 1. Destroy the universe, 2. Fill the universe.
I'm sure the alternate timeline theory would fix this problem, but let's say that there is only one time line. (which is just as good of a theory as the multi-time line theory) If there is only one time line, has the future already happened? Then we'd have to assume that time travel was not possible since a recursive time travel scenario hasn't destroyed the Universe. But then, that problem may not happen until time travel is discovered.
Originally posted by electric
My thoughts, as usual;
If it is possible to travel back in time then there's no way you could actually effect what is happening or even be perceived by anything existing in that time. It would be nothing more than a world of light.
I you believe some of those stories about physics helping detectives to solve crimes by remote viewing back in time, then you might consider such a mechanism does exist.