It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci Must Be Fired (2005 Chloroquine Study) ....updated

page: 15
67
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 12 2020 @ 05:18 PM
link   
The statistics and information is still getting Democratically/politically skewed I see 🤣🤣🤣




posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 06:43 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Negatory.

Its effing cold in Victoria Australia right now.



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 09:15 AM
link   
justthenews.com...

"Further, it seems quite possible that the FDA, a third of whose funding comes from drug companies, is under intense pressure from those companies to be extremely conservative in its handling of hydroxychloroquine. If hydroxychloroquine is used widely and comes to be recognized as highly effective, the markets for expensive and patented COVID-19 medications, including intravenous drugs that can only be used in the hospital, will shrink substantially," Risch wrote."



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 02:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Pladuim

That seems to be a very large factor in any calculation for why we're seeing what we're seeing.



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Pladuim

With the number of hospitalizations in America steadily decreasing since early July, the pharmaceutical companies are becoming even more desperate and putting more pressure on the FDA to keep a vaccine from appearing too soon. They want to milk the covid-19 epidemic for all they can get... while they can.



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust



With the number of hospitalizations in America steadily decreasing since early July,

End of July, actually. But yeah, that's happened before.

covidtracking.com...
edit on 8/13/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 07:49 PM
link   
Do not use hydroxychloroquine for COVID: National Taskforce (Australia)


Associate Professor Julian Elliott, Executive Director of the National COVID-19 Clinical Evidence Taskforce, said the evidence indicates hydroxychloroquine is potentially harmful and no more effective than standard care in treating patients with COVID-19.

‘We have reviewed all the scientific data around hydroxychloroquine and we can now say, definitively, that hydroxychloroquine should not be used as a treatment for anyone with COVID-19,’ he said.

‘There is now sufficient data for us to make a very clear and strong recommendation. In this instance, that is based on data from randomised controlled trials that enrolled nearly 6000 patients.

‘This is a substantial amount of very high-quality scientific data upon which we’ve based the recommendation.



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 09:15 PM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

Use an Executive Order to make Hydroxychloroquine available over the counter for treatment/prevention of COVID 19

petitions.whitehouse.gov...



posted on Aug, 13 2020 @ 11:39 PM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

Effect of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: Preliminary results from a multi-centre, randomized, controlled trial.

This is the study referenced by the taskforce. One this I see missing is the role of Zinc in this study. With the doctors that are finding an effective benefit, HCQ and Zinc work together in reducing the impacts of the infection.



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 01:06 AM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev


This is the study referenced by the taskforce. One this I see missing is the role of Zinc in this study.


Which is yet to be proven.

The ball's in your court in that respect.



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 02:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian

COVID-19 Outpatients – Early Risk-Stratified Treatment with Zinc Plus Low Dose Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin: A Retrospective Case Series Study


the odds of hospitalization of treated patients were 84% less than in the untreated group. One patient (0.7%) died in the treatment group versus 13 patients (3.5%) in the untreated group (odds ratio 0.2, 95% CI 0.03-1.5; p=0.16). There were no cardiac side effects. Conclusions: Risk stratification-based treatment of COVID-19 outpatients as early as possible after symptom onset with the used triple therapy, including the combination of zinc with low dose hydroxychloroquine, was associated with significantly less hospitalizations and 5 times less all-cause deaths.



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 04:33 AM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev


A retrospective study looks backwards and examines exposures to suspected risk or protection factors in relation to an outcome that is established at the start of the study. Many valuable case-control studies, such as Lane and Claypon's 1926 investigation of risk factors for breast cancer, were retrospective investigations. Most sources of error due to confounding and bias are more common in retrospective studies than in prospective studies. For this reason, retrospective investigations are often criticised. If the outcome of interest is uncommon, however, the size of prospective investigation required to estimate relative risk is often too large to be feasible. In retrospective studies the odds ratio provides an estimate of relative risk. You should take special care to avoid sources of bias and confounding in retrospective studies.


To the source

The lead author:

‘Miracle drug’ Dr. Vladimir Zelenko is tweeting pro-Trump conspiracy theories

Try again.



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 07:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Southern Guardian



Try again.


Why should I? what are your qualifications and what are you going to do about it anyway? Your tone sounds like neuronflux on 9/11. You appear quite happy that a drug that has been approved for 65 years is now classified as a poison. Are you claiming Dr. Vladimir Zelenko as a charlatan now?



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 08:28 AM
link   
Dr Zalenko, Dr Harvey Risch to name but a few getting slated and called liars a few times on here by a certain few,They must have great qualifications to be able to call them kwakakev a reply to: kwakakev



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:02 PM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev


You appear quite happy that a drug that has been approved for 65 years is now classified as a poison.

Please cite this classification.



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: kwakakev


You appear quite happy that a drug that has been approved for 65 years is now classified as a poison.

Please cite this classification.


Phage you do know that Jeffery Epstein did not kill himself right ?



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:36 PM
link   
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Is hydroxychloroquine classified as a poison?



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Is hydroxychloroquine classified as a poison?


I don't think any experts have classified it as poison no, but the MSM has snuck in calling it poison a few times but if you think I'm gonna look those MSM happenings up ....I'm not .







posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 05:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Phage



Is hydroxychloroquine classified as a poison?


It has been in Melbourne to help implement its Biosecurity act. Have you heard about the stories of doctors having their licence threatened if they prescribe HCQ in some parts. At least one of the doctors from the American Frontline doctors has been fired. What about some pharmacies for the first time over ruling a doctors prescription and denying filling orders for HCQ?



posted on Aug, 14 2020 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: kwakakev




It has been in Melbourne to help implement its Biosecurity act.
Can you cite a source?


What about some pharmacies for the first time over ruling a doctors prescription and denying filling orders for HCQ?
I heard about one pharmacy, yes. I've also heard of pharmacies refusing to fill opioid and contraception prescriptions too. They've been sued on occasion.




top topics



 
67
<< 12  13  14    16  17  18 >>

log in

join