It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Knows what? That it has nothing to do with COVID-19 and it has nothing to do with humans? Maybe. What's your point?
But what was this? finally admitting that something does exist outside the atmosphere
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: NorthOfStuff
People get better without treatment. The vast majority of people do so, in fact.
There is no way to determine if their treatments had any effect at all.
The death till going up, the lock down getting harder. All while a safe, cheep and effective solution exists. Do you really want to kill millions?
The 2005 study wasn’t published by the NIH and didn’t prove chloroquine was effective against “COVID-1” because that’s not a real disease.
The study found that chloroquine could inhibit the spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome in animal cell culture, and the authors said more research was needed.
There are currently no approved medications or treatments for COVID-19.
research findings by scientists from the German Primate Center (DPZ) in Göttingen, the Charité in Berlin and the University Hospital in Bonn now speak a very clear language: Chloroquine is not suitable for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections. It simply does not work.
originally posted by: projectvxn
Seems the data of the new study on which cells it enters points to chloroquine having no effect in the lungs. So the data is essentially useless and this whole debate was pretty much for nothing.
Oh well. I learned something today.
Thanks for the post.
The facts are out about HCQ and it's clear. It's not an effective treatment against COVID19.
More decisive research is needed to assess its value in patients with mild disease or as pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis in patients exposed to COVID-19.
Why are efforts to undertake such a study blocked in Melbourne?
c19study.com has so far compiled 120 different studies, many showing positive results
You're not interested in having a clean and honest debate, clearly.
COVID-19 cases are reduced by [49%, 29%, 16%] respectively when taken within ~[70, 94, 118] hours of exposure (including shipping delay). The treatment delay-response relationship is significant at p=0.002. PEP delayed treatment RCT.
After high-risk or moderate-risk exposure to Covid-19, hydroxychloroquine did not prevent illness compatible with Covid-19 or confirmed infection when used as postexposure prophylaxis within 4 days after exposure.
Retrospective 2,882 patients in China, median age 62, 278 receiving HC Q, median 10 days post hospitalization, showing that HC Q treatment can reduce systemic inflammation and inhibit the cytokine storm, thus protecting multiple organs from inflammatory injuries, such as detoxification in the liver and attenuation of cardiac injury
Really, autism vaccines? You want to prove a negative?
numbers steadily declining,