It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Dr. Anthony Fauci Must Be Fired (2005 Chloroquine Study) ....updated

page: 10
62
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 04:34 PM
link   

edit on 8 3 2020 by projectvxn because: nevermind




posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 06:44 PM
link   
July 22, 2020
More Evidence Presented for Why Hydroxychloroquine Should be Made Available, in a New Court Filing by AAPS



This week the Association of American Physicians & Surgeons submitted additional evidence to a federal court for why interference with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) should end by the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), in AAPS v. FDA, No. 1:20-cv-00493-RJJ-SJB (W.D. Mich.).

“As confirmed by another recent study of thousands of patients at the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, HCQ is both very safe and highly effective in treating COVID-19, reducing mortality by 50%,” AAPS informed the court in its filing. “Countries with underdeveloped health care systems are using HCQ early and attaining far lower mortality than in the United States, where [HHS and the FDA] impede access to HCQ.”

Yet most Americans are still unable to obtain HCQ for early treatment of COVID-19, and virtually no Americans are able to access it as preventive medicine. HCQ has been used safely for decades by travelers to protect against malaria, but Americans are dying from COVID-19 while HCQ is withheld from them.

“Citizens of the Philippines, Poland, Israel, and Turkey all have greater access to HCQ than American citizens do,” observes AAPS General Counsel Andrew Schlafly. “In Venezuela, HCQ is available over the counter without a prescription, while in the United States pharmacists are prevented from filling prescriptions for HCQ.”


aapsonline.org...



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 07:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777


“As confirmed by another recent study of thousands of patients at the Henry Ford Health System in Michigan, HCQ is both very safe and highly effective in treating COVID-19, reducing mortality by 50%,”

That is a very misleading statement about that study. It was a study with no controls and no blinding. A retrospective study. There is no way to say it was "highly effective." A cursory look at the data reveals many flaws. As posted previously:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

The study makes no mention of the safety, other than this:

Our results also require further confirmation in prospective, randomized controlled trials that rigorously evaluate the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine therapy for COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.
www.sciencedirect.com...

One would do well to include several pounds of salt with anything issued by AAPS.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) is a conservative non-profit association founded in 1944. The group was reported to have about 5,000 members in 2014. The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.
en.wikipedia.org...
edit on 8/3/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 07:23 PM
link   
Hydroxychloroquine lowers COVID-19 death rate, Henry Ford Health study finds
Sarah Rahal and Beth LeBlanc, The Detroit NewsPublished 1:10 p.m. ET July 2, 2020

www.detroitnews.com... 5365090002/

I don't know what to believe, but I don't trust what is happening not even a little bit.


Henry Ford defends hydroxychloroquine study, 'saddened' by drug's politicization
Beth LeBlanc, The Detroit NewsPublished 12:57 p.m. ET Aug. 3, 2020 |

www.detroitnews.com...



posted on Aug, 3 2020 @ 07:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Stormdancer777

You might start with the study itself.

Limitations to our analysis include the retrospective, non-randomized, non-blinded study design. Also, information on duration of symptoms prior to hospitalization was not available for analysis.



However, our results should be interpreted with some caution and should not be applied to patients treated outside of hospital settings. Our results also require further confirmation in prospective, randomized controlled trials that rigorously evaluate the safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine therapy for COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.

www.sciencedirect.com...

 


Henry Ford defends hydroxychloroquine study, 'saddened' by drug's politicization
Beth LeBlanc,

Your source:

The hospital system warned that its results needed further study, particularly "prospective, randomized controlled trials."


Now compare that to what AAPS said about it, speaking of "politicization." Do you think maybe that's the sort of thing she was talking about?

edit on 8/3/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2020 @ 01:09 AM
link   
a reply to: projectvxn

Who exactly is Ben Swann? What is his medical specialty? It is epidemiology? Is it statistics? What?

The first video is comparing N95 masks to surgical masks NOT any mask to no mask. N95 masks should be reserved for medical personnel, 'civilians' should use surgical masks or properly made homemade masks.

The second video touts a study talking about pandemic INFLUENZA. Covid-19 is NOT influenza and there is a great deal of evidence that aerosol transmission plays a much bigger role than it does with influenza.

Here is (real) Doctor Norman Swan on masks (specifically at the 3:00 mark): reduces transmission by 70%



Here is Doctor Swan again, with information specifically addressing WHO research into masks and Covid-19: the evidence is clear: masks DO work.

Would the widespread use of masks in public help stop the spread of coronavirus? Dr Norman Swan takes a look.

Really, it is silly to be fighting over this. What exactly are you objecting to? If you wearing a mask MIGHT save just one life, why are you so afraid of it? If me wearing a mask MIGHT save your life, why are you so adamant against it?

Please just wear a mask. It isn't hard. It isn't too much to ask.

And on a lighter note: The Urine Test



posted on Aug, 4 2020 @ 01:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage




Please just wear a mask. It isn't hard. It isn't too much to ask.





posted on Aug, 4 2020 @ 02:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: americanbuffalo1
I don't think highly of Fauci myself and find him to be a 'compromised expert' of whom his words mean nothing as he has spoken from both sides of his mouth often enough.

That said, it could conceivably be done by President Trump I'd imagine. My question is why does Trump keep him around? Makes me wonder about Trump.


It would take political capital to fire him, and the media would make Fauci out to be a martyr.

Keeping him around is useful for another reason. Because Fauci is so obviously evil, and he is the face of the medical industry, keeping him around brings the entire medical industry into disrepute. He is pulling down the medical pharmaceutical complex, in the same way that Prince Andrew is taking down the royal family.

Once the medical pharmaceutical complex is taken out, then we can stop covid, stop most vaccinations, and cure heart disease with EDTA and lysine. Those actions will stop millions of deaths per year, and there are many more suppressed cures, which together will reduce the global death rate by at least half. The medical pharmaceutical complex is the biggest killer worldwide.



posted on Aug, 4 2020 @ 02:14 AM
link   
a reply to: RumannXylo
The White House put a muzzle on Fauci for about 3 weeks, while they re-programmed the guy.

Since his return, no more of the radical "We may never be able to shake hands again" statements from Fauci.

edit on 8/4/2020 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
62
<< 7  8  9   >>

log in

join