It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: PHDIKOULAS
a reply to: zatara
Run away from all the facts presented and continue talking about his wife and anything else that is irrelevant. Dolan is a charlatan and the more this thread continues the more evidence appear that prove this
originally posted by: Jay-morris
....
There is a huge difference to someone being a Charleton to someone who has made mistakes in the field.
So please post away. I just hope you are not another wannabe debunker who knows nothing about the subject
originally posted by: JimOberg
originally posted by: Jay-morris
....
There is a huge difference to someone being a Charleton to someone who has made mistakes in the field.
So please post away. I just hope you are not another wannabe debunker who knows nothing about the subject
It would clarify some of the fog if you listed three or four 'mistakes' you admit Dolan has made -- bogus claims enumerated and documented in previous posts in this thread.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Harte
So tell me, did Dolan know the claim was bogus? Because if not, then there are far better "researchers" right here at ATS than Dolan is.
If so, then Dolan lied, didn't he?
Seriously, it's like talking to a brick wall. I have stated many times on this thread that he has made mistakes, as he is only human.
So Dolan is senile because he repeats the same "mistakes" multiple (I assume) times.
I write a book containing several claims and give my evidence for why they are true.
A year later I find my claims weren't true at all.
If I write another book containing those same claims, what am I doing?
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: Harte
So tell me, did Dolan know the claim was bogus? Because if not, then there are far better "researchers" right here at ATS than Dolan is.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Harte
So Dolan is senile because he repeats the same "mistakes" multiple (I assume) times.
I write a book containing several claims and give my evidence for why they are true.
A year later I find my claims weren't true at all.
If I write another book containing those same claims, what am I doing?
Give me an example? I mean YOU give me an example?
originally posted by: Jay-morris
So you disagree with what Oberg said yet? I see you skipped that part, I wonder why?
originally posted by: 111DPKING111
Im not sure this photo is known by some common name to check if it had been debunked before he did the show. Is there some site you can go to and check for the recently debunked?
originally posted by: CardDown
In the Aug. 1, 2020 episode of "The UnXplained," Richard Dolan touts the 1870 picture of a yardstick as the earliest known photo of a UFO, something that has never been explained. It was soundly debunked in 2013.
Is This the Oldest Known UFO Photo? One NH Researcher Finds Out
After six years of off-and-on digging, he found an important clue: a 2003 Weirs Times newspaper article unearthed by Kathy Brisendine, another UFO researcher. The article identified the photographers of the stereoscopic image as Amos Clough and Howard Kimball. The image had been taken in the winter of 1870-71 during a meteorological expedition, which he would learn later included a study of frost architecture.
Mullahy googled the expedition and discovered that the New York Public Library had a copy of the original high-resolution, uncropped photo (see above) in its digital library, along with a number of photos from the same set. After examining them closely, he decided his initial reaction was right: "The object in the photo is not in the cloud, but on the surface of the mountain itself. In the original photo, there is a clear distinction between the surface of the mountain and the sky above the mountain range. The brown object is lying on, or suspended in, the snow on the mountaintop." He says it could be a wooden ruler used to measure the snow or to show scale, but definitely is not a UFO.
So, I am to ignore the previous poster's statement that Dolan repeated a long-debunked BS claim?
Why should I do that?
One lie makes him a liar, when he purports to be a UFO "researcher."
Did Oberg say Dolan didn't repeat a long debunked BS claim implying it was true?
Why are you dodging this? Why are you talking to me if you refuse to communicate?
I have never detected any indication he's not sincere and genuinely enthusiastic
I told you already I'm here to learn and I have. But the main thing I've learned is that you will do anything conceivable to maintain your fantasy world view.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
a reply to: Harte
So, I am to ignore the previous poster's statement that Dolan repeated a long-debunked BS claim?
Why should I do that?
One lie makes him a liar, when he purports to be a UFO "researcher."
So, in other words you cannot be bothered to do the research yourself. Which means you are an arm chair debunker.
originally posted by: October
...
Or maybe it’s your refusal to think Impartially that’s brought you here, I’m guessing the latter.
...
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
Straight out of the horses mouths say in the Walton case we have witnesses who passed multiple lie detector tests say point blank that Phillip Klass tried to bribe them to betray the other's testimony, and then on this thread the liars come out and attempt to debunk that verified fact.
I’m frankly astounded by the vitriol on this thread. Schoolyard name calling, mirageman insulting his wife. It’s not a respectful discussion is it?
It’s very easy to copy and paste a person’s past mistakes related to his chosen field/profession on a forum and gleefully dissect it.
I guess I have to say this once again. Show me where I've made ANY ATTEMPT WHATSOEVER to debunk anything in this thread.
So, in other words you cannot be bothered to do the research yourself. You're comfortable with Dolan lying to you then.
Otherwise you'd have shown me where he admitted even a single one of his many "mistakes," as you call them, and ceased repeating them.
originally posted by: Jay-morris
...
I have not once said that Dolan has not made mistakes. I have not once said that I agree or believe everything he says. What I am saying, is there is absolutly no evidence that he is a con man.
...