It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Another ufo researcher bites the dust

page: 12
12
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 8 2020 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: IMSAM
a reply to: Jay-morris


You try to convince everyone that Dolan is an honest esteemed respectable authority and you avoid to adress any questions posed

We got a saying here, no matter how much sugar you put to fecal matter it doesnt become a chocolate cake


No matter how much you defend Dolan and deflect facts here , Dolan is and will be a conman, a scammer, a snake oil peddler, a bad researcher.


Dolan is a great researcher and presenter. His work in publishing other authors in the field is a great service to us all. Dolan's National security state books are a must read. Most importantly he is not a small-minded and mean spirited person, who spends his time day after day attacking people, and their family, he doesn't know.

He is a true historian and was a Rhodes finalist for a reason.

That said, he is a human being who makes mistakes and gets things wrong. Sometimes publicly and embarrassingly. He has owned up to some of his mistakes, not to some others. It happens. Not to you of course, but to the rest of us.




posted on Aug, 8 2020 @ 02:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman

originally posted by: TheMadScientist2
As far as I know Dolan had nothing to do with the Boyd Bushman, as far as I know the interviews were conducted by David Sereda, but I may be wrong about it.


Perhaps a web search would have helped?

Dolan interviewed Bushman in March 2013.



If you look closely at the video here at this point you'll also recognise the cameraman. The star of the Z-movie "Jeremy Corbell Bob Lazar and Flying Saucers " grifting away.



How many mistakes do you have to make, in this thread alone, before we can conclude you are a charlatan and a con man?

Boyd Bushman. Good grief.
edit on 8-8-2020 by Sublant because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 8 2020 @ 03:55 PM
link   
a reply to: Sublant

Tell me about it. This thread is pretty much dead now. False accusations led to nowhere. Just more ufo bashing!



posted on Aug, 8 2020 @ 10:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Jay-morris

Dead? The only thing dead is dolans credibility. Try as you might you cant get him in the clear. Dolan is a bad researcher at best a conman at worst.




Ps deathbed confession?



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 12:14 AM
link   
a reply to: IMSAM

I suspect quite a few could agree with you.






posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 04:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: IMSAM
a reply to: Jay-morris

Dead? The only thing dead is dolans credibility. Try as you might you cant get him in the clear. Dolan is a bad researcher at best a conman at worst.




Ps deathbed confession?


Sorry, but you have posted absolutly nothing, just bashing. You mentioned the Roswell slides, and you were wrong about that. So you have to ask if you are bashing him for the sake of it.

All you have posted, is the fact he has made mistakes, nothing else. But you have done what debunkers do, and that is twist it and use your own beliefs to come up with a conclusion.

Not good at all!



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 04:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: Baablacksheep
a reply to: IMSAM

I suspect quite a few could agree with you.





Only the usual suspects



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 05:32 AM
link   
a reply to: Sublant

www.youtube.com...

I guess a human being makes mistakes, can be duped and get"s things wrong.

Most people understand that.



Has Richard Dolan ever solved a UFO case?



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 05:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: October
a reply to: mirageman

.....

Of course Wilson is going to deny the meeting ever took place, do you think he would be truthful if it meant his entire career reputation unravelled under him?



He could be lying. But is there any other evidence to establish Wison was in Las Vegas on the date claimed? Like a meeting appointment?



Dolan's truth simply isn't based on that insistence. If it was, he certainly wouldn't be able to upload a 5 hour deep dive discussing it. or the zoom discussions with a plethora of other researchers reaching the same conclusion. ...


Can you provide two or three main points you've taken from this 5 hour deep dive and other discussions that point to the events in the Wilson document being real?


edit on 9/8/2020 by mirageman because: ...



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Jay-morris

No, its both the slides, the ufo on the moon, the structures on the moon, the wilson hoax, 2 blog articles by sheaffer full of stuff, a truckload by oberg, that ufo photo couple pages back, the deathbed confession where the old geezer was(in 2017)-is still alive possibly etc etc etc.

Its ample truth that he is either a conman or a scammer.

We established that. Now the question is why are you so mad. Are you dolan? The first three pages have enough facts to establish he is a charlatan. Its not bashing as you try to make it



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 08:17 AM
link   
Dolan also supports the kumburgaz ufo case which has been debunked thoroughly.

reddit



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 08:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: IMSAM
a reply to: Jay-morris

No, its both the slides, the ufo on the moon, the structures on the moon, the wilson hoax, 2 blog articles by sheaffer full of stuff, a truckload by oberg, that ufo photo couple pages back, the deathbed confession where the old geezer was(in 2017)-is still alive possibly etc etc etc.

Its ample truth that he is either a conman or a scammer.

We established that. Now the question is why are you so mad. Are you dolan? The first three pages have enough facts to establish he is a charlatan. Its not bashing as you try to make it


They are not facts that he is a con man! Just means he makes mistakes. Please answer me this.

Even Oberg said never detected any indication he's not sincere and genuinely enthusiastic. So, is Overt wrong?

Can you answer that?



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 09:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: PHDIKOULAS
Dolan also supports the kumburgaz ufo case which has been debunked thoroughly.

reddit


How can you say it has been "debunked thoroughly" when even today, opinions very about the object in question?

Even in the link, people cannot make their mind up. Was it fake, a cruise ship? People cannot seem to make up their minds.

So it's not debunked, just opinions.



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: Jay-morris

It is debunked. But this is not the thread for that discussion.



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: PHDIKOULAS
Dolan also supports the kumburgaz ufo case which has been debunked thoroughly.

reddit


That case has definitely not been debunked. Just flooded with opinions on what it is.

Debunked by people with the same opinion on every other UFO case.



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 11:12 AM
link   
8

originally posted by: PHDIKOULAS
a reply to: Jay-morris

It is debunked. But this is not the thread for that discussion.


So, we have some skeptics saying it's a cruise ship, we have some skeptics saying to do with the camera, and we have skeptics saying it was a hoax.

How can you say it's debunked, when they cannot even agree. That makes no sense!



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 11:26 AM
link   
a reply to: mirageman




Has Richard Dolan ever solved a UFO case


Has anyone ever solved a UFO case?


I’ll answer that
NO!

Of course, maybe your asking has he determined one that it wasn’t a UFO, certainly he won’t do that since he is only interested in the mystery of the unknown. That will keep him occupied.


Just imagine what Ufologists would do if this were solved, they’d have to get real jobs





edit on 9-8-2020 by Willtell because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-8-2020 by Willtell because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Jay-morris

So at how many mistakes can we put him in the bad researcher category?



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

With all due respect, why should I do your research work for you? Have you watched any of the videos? If you think it's nonsense you can knock yourself out with around ten hours of discussion. Surely they can string out enough bullcrap over that time to backup your opinion.

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...

www.youtube.com...





edit on 9/8/20 by October because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2020 @ 12:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: PHDIKOULAS
a reply to: Jay-morris

It is debunked. But this is not the thread for that discussion.


The cruise ship (and yacht windows) hypothesis has been proven to be FALSE on Metabunk.

The (2008) Kumburgaz video was shot from underneath a canopy where Yalcin was working as a night guard.
That same canopy happens to be in a fly-by video posted on Youtube (the Youtube video has no further relation to the UFO case). This fly-by shows a light post, about 28 meters from the canopy.

The top of that same light post was shortly captured in Yalcin’s video, and allows a verification of the moon’s altitude at the clock time in the video. They all match: the clock time, the moon’s altitude, and the altitude of the top of the light post. (Note that Yalcin had been fiddling with AM/PM which made people suspicious about the correctness of the time in the video. Yalcin, however, told that the time itself was always set correctly and that he was only unsure whether to set the clock to AM or PM).

Using the moon’s altitude, the UFO altitude can be determined. It is 7 degrees, too high to be a cruise ship (and much too high for a yacht).

In that same Metabunk threat, you can see independent movements of the alleged `alien head' - these independent movements cannot be explained with static objects like the ones proposed in your link.
edit on 9-8-2020 by Guest101 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
12
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join