Docs Unsealed Ghislaine Maxwell

A judge has unsealed documents regarding the Maxwell Lawsuit.

Interesting thing is the redactions apparently were not done correctly and can be seen in you copy them into notepad.

I will leave links for the document dumps, grab them before they are pulled down.

I think the Court has already removed them.

These are not my links.

Mega.nz folder number is : DaJjSYYI#_lNy62k2_HunO7-juCUOHQ

Pastebin folder VHiDdX3V

www.courtlistener.com...

This is the court order for release
www.documentcloud.org/documents/6181306-Court-Order-Unseal.html

drive.google.com...

There are high profile names throughout that can been seen once you copy and paste the redactions.

a reply to: Identified

Care to give more of an explanation as to what the names pertain to?

No decryption key for mega link.

Courtlistener link not working for me.

Documentcloud is meh.

Are they all three the same information?

I skimmed the Documentcloud. Didn't see anything redacted. Didn't really see anything major.

I'm going to go back through it. See if I missed anything

Didn't miss anything from the Documentcloud link.

Just a rehash of what's already been discussed and known for a while.

a reply to: AutomateThis1

The doc cloud is the court order allowing the release.
Mega.nz folder number is : DaJjSYYI#_lNy62k2_HunO7-juCUOHQ
The pastebin is individual PDFs.

People are going through them now but so far it's Clinton, Dershowitz, Glenn Dubin, Prince Andrew, Bill Richardson, a Prime Minister which I'm trying ftk figure out who. Another prince I think was arab.

It's a lot of pages to read through.


[link removed]

a VERY interesting development...

someone found out that if you highlight all text (cntrl A) then paste it into notepad it removes the decations.

Someone stuffed up MAJORLY!

this isnt a joke.. many of us did it
twitter.com...

some of the names:

- Alan Dershowitz
- Glenn Dubin
- Stephen Kaufmann
- Prince Andrew
- Jean Luc Brunel
- Bill Richardson
- Marvin Minsky

and TRUMP is mentioned (sorry anti-trumpers not in the way you want)

a reply to: Agit8dChop
That's what I'm saying. Just copy and paste each page into a word doc or notepad and it will be un-redacted. Easy peasy!

a reply to: Agit8dChop

and TRUMP is mentioned (sorry anti-trumpers not in the way you want)

She never observed them (Donald and Jeffrey) together, and yet there are pictures of all three of them together?

I question how such a monumental screw up could have happened that this wasn't redacted correctly.
Or was it on purpose?

a reply to: Phage

Logic???

Those pictures may not have been in conjunction with the island or plane. I'm in a lot of pictures with people but that doesn't mean some other person would have ever seen me with that person somewhere with them.
KWIM?

a reply to: Identified

Neither the plane or the island are the context of the statement.

She said she never saw them together. She's in pictures with both of them. Together.

a reply to: Phage

Is there a pic of Giuffre with Trump and Epstein?

Plus she says she doesn't remember. Doesn't mean it didn't happen but I am still trying to find this actual picture.

a reply to: Identified



What's really interesting is that she was being asked about Trump. And may have lied.

a reply to: Phage

Giuffre isn't in that picture.

I thought the person in that deposition was Giuffre, not Maxwell.

That's a pic of Trump, Melania, Epstein and Maxwell.

a reply to: Agit8dChop

That image is a document dated October 2019.

I thought the actual documents regarding Maxwell are slated to be released on Monday.

Do these documents being discussed have a recent date stamped at the top like legal documents do?

a reply to: Identified

I thought the person in that deposition was Giuffre, not Maxwell.

Never mind. You're right. That particular transcript is old news and unrelated to the topic.
nymag.com...

a reply to: Phage

Yeah that page is a deposition by Giuffre. She is being asked how she knew Epstein and Trump were good friends and she answers that Jeffrey told her so. The she is asked if she ever observed them together or if Trump flirted with her or was ever in various places and she says no.

a reply to: Phage

No problem.

a reply to: TXRabbit

Yes, if you click on the Google drive link I provided above you will see the court stamps of the case number and 7/30/2020.

I personally think that Trump has been smart enough not to burn himself on sex with minors. He loves his money and luxury too much to be separated from it. He may be a sexist pig for all I care, but no amount of money will prevent something like that from eventually rising to the surface, people talk plain and simple, and Trump apparently made sure he didn’t cross that particular line. Besides, many men, as do I, think it is abject and morally wrong to have sex with a child. Trump is most likely one of those men. Another reason, could be the fact that Trump may have been wanting to become POTUS for a very long time, and realized that something like that would be a threat to his future plans.

In any case, I truly hope he at least has certain (moral) standards, I really do.

a reply to: Identified

Oh. Boy. The former Governor of my home state is on that list. Honestly, I'm not surprised.

And Epstein had a home in New Mexico.

a reply to: 2Faced

I have faith that he does.