It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: network dude
If as you suggest, proof that implicates Obama in illegal activities is mounting then I say sure, take him to trial. Find a prosecutor , bring charges, take it to a grand jury, and if they say go ahead and prosecute, do it. Let him find a lawyer or two to defend him in court and let's have at it.
Likewise, if there is evidence that Trump has broken laws,either as POtUS or a a private citizen, find a prosecutor, bring charges, take it to a grand jury and if they say go ahead, do it. Let him find a lawyer to defend him and let them get to it.
Do we want to drain the swamp or not? I say enough of this ''i'ts not good for the country BS that you mention has been said.I say if there is evidence of a crime, then let's let a jury decide. No more hiding behind the ''it's not good for the nation''..Maybe if we stopped letting these guys off the hook, then maybe future unlawful types would not be so excited about holding that job and we might get a better grade of candidates to choose from.
And as far as ''locking em up'', how's that ''locking Clinton up'' proceeding. All that mounted evidence and proof? All that chanting and extolling it from the podium on the campaign trail.. How close is she to being tried in a court of law. Why has Trump just ''let it slide''.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: HalWesten
In any case. Trump changed his mind. Fancy that. I guess someone told him he doesn't have absolute authority. Again.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Ah, the joys of checking ATS in the AM and seeing a thread degenerate into a dumpster fire in true partisan fashion. It just needs a locomotive filled with Murder Hornets to barrel into now.
originally posted by: Drucifer
If you took every stereotypical talking point from either side and fed it all to an AI bot, it would recreate this thread with such accuracy we’d have to start a new thread about how scary accurate AI is getting at replicating humans.
I also think some posters on this site need only about ten lines of code and a standard cachet of partisan talking points.
originally posted by: Drucifer
“You support a guy who did this, this and that and you’re too drunk on Trump-Aid to realize it. Trump’s a wannabe dictator and was best friends with Epstein and Maxwell.”
“Like this Democrat, libtard, Leftist, Marxist, commie, CCP-loving did? Nothing you say means anything to anyone. Trump will win in 2020.”
It’s 11 pages of nothing but that, just arranged differently.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: Vasa Croe
We have a troll president. Classy.
Someone needed to point out the hypocrisy of the left. The quickest way to do so is exactly what he is doing.
Better than a President who kneels and bows to everyone and everything.....and much better than the possibility of one with dementia.