What happened after CNN told us what NOT to do? You guessed it. The number of people going to Wikileaks's website to view the documents, went
through the roof.
Similarly, we now have the Social Media platforms of Google, YouTube (owned by Google), Facebook, and Twitter, telling us what is "bad" to read/watch,
or removing posts/videos all-together, or kicking users off their platform. They do this simply because a post/video contains information that the
owners and executives of these companies do not want the general public to know.
Or, in the case of the #1 most popular internet search engine "Google search", entire news articles, blogs, or online documents, are kept hidden, or
moved way down the list of search results, because they contain information that is contrary to the agenda of Google executives.
Last night, Tucker Carlson (FoxNews) laid this out beautifully. His primary example is how YouTube, Facebook and Twitter, removed the video of a
press conference held by medical doctors on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday. Within 6 hours of their video "going viral", it was
(almost) completely purged from all 3 platforms.
Watch the first 10 minutes of this Tucker Carlson episode to learn WHY social media owners are being so rabid in their censoring and banning of users
this year. He "connects the dots" very logically, in an easy to understand manner.
YouTube removed the above video in less than 5 hours!
Here it is on Twitter (for now)-- twitter.com...
Apparently, Social Media company executives did not learn from the CNN 2016 mistake. By telling Americans that a certain information is "dangerous"
to see or read, that just makes more people find it, look at it, and try to understand it!
The owners of Google/YouTube-Facebook-Twitter have either been out of normal society for too long, and/or they think the majority of U.S. citizens are
dumb and gullible. They couldn't be more mistaken, lol.
edit on 7/29/2020 by carewemust because: (no reason given)
YouTube and google are not censored for me. YouTube always gives me videos people claim to have been banned. Same with google. Are they biased yes,
but the results are still there. I am guessing you do not fully understand how cookies and cache work which is fine. But if you look up a lot of news
from sources you disagree with you will get more results that share that view. I look up things evenly as to not have that problem.
YouTube for instance I am constantly getting ads for the NRA and CZ weapons. I don’t mind as I am. Member and own a Scorpion.
Amazon also does the same thing. And if they really wanted to censor then so be it man. Capitalism man, that is how that works.
Don’t like it don’t use it.
originally posted by: hangedman13
Didn't take long for that video to come down either. Ironic how it proves your point.
LMAO! Why are these people deciding for full grown adults
what information they want at any given time. How utterly
childish these rich bastards are.
The only thing they should be censoring is porn. And anyone
any citizen of the U.S. that thinks the censorship of any information
is a good thing then they deserve chains. If the owners of these info
gathering sites can't honor the freedoms of the people on their sites.
Then they shouldn't be running them. Why they are with an agenda
isn't because they need the money now is it?
edit on 29-7-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)
Unless it’s a Christian bakery right? Then it’s “reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee they HAVE to cater for EVERYONE reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee”
Besides, the entire world knows the hydroxychloriquin treatment is legitimate. That much is obvious.
Unless of course you’re gonna dispute medical experts who openly tout the treatment’s success all the world over.
The entire world knows the fake wuflu numbers are definitely faked and overhyped.
Nobody is thick enough to believe that a car crash victim dies of the wuflu
The entire world knows it’s very innocuous and if you catch the wuflu you’re more likely to die from a common cold.
Except for thick people, they think it’s practically Ebola.
But the easily manipulated worthless npc’s absolutely MUST bleat the same bleat that the media bleats. Wear a maaask, waaaash your haaaands.
Removing videos not only confirms that the over reaction to this harmless virus is absolutely staged and planned but that twitter and facebook are
100% propaganda outlets for the lowest of iq’s
Good grief! Now I need to find the clip somewhere else quickly, while editing the Opening Post is still possible.
Oh but there's nothing going on here you tube bans are never political
or cater to any agenda!
Oh ya they should ban that stuff ya cause that's uh that's.... disinformation that's
It's disinformation that ah nobody wants to see. Eh erm.... WORD PORN!
That's it ya wa word porn. They gotta gotta take that down don't be look'n at that.
Ya don't change a thing Care it looks badass like that. All Orwell n s###.
edit on 29-7-2020 by carsforkids because: (no reason given)
a reply to: carsforkids
A couple of your sentences rekindled memory of the horrible DOJ Inspector General (Michael Horowitz) declaring that there was NO POLITICAL BIAS at the
FBI. Everything they did to the Trump campaign and Trump Presidency was NECESSARY.
how come you support twitter then, as you constantly post using it as a source, surely it would be better to abstain from posting links which drive
people to the site which then in turn makes twitter more money.
will this be the last time you post using twitter as a source? (i doubt it)
DOCTORS NOW PROVE... CoronaVirus COVID19 Treatment & Prevention With HCQ HydroxyChloroQuine Works
Here is another copy of the segment by Tucker Carlson on youtube, while it is still up.
For Tucker Carlson's views on the situation, this censorship is all about the election. As the nation suffers the impacts of covid, support is
shifting towards the democrats as people look for a change in leadership. The more the nation hurts, the better chance the Democrats have to take back
political office as people become disgruntled with their way of life.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.