Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

who say china is not copying

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 11:16 AM
link   
You have voted W4rl0rD for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have two more votes this month.




posted on Apr, 3 2005 @ 11:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by Taishyou
It's actually the Japanese that copies more.


The difference between the Japanese and the Chinese is that the Japanese actually bought the rights to the designs and got permission to produce them. China buys one or steals one example of what they want and then copy it without permission.



posted on Apr, 5 2005 @ 12:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by jetsetter

Originally posted by Taishyou
It's actually the Japanese that copies more.


The difference between the Japanese and the Chinese is that the Japanese actually bought the rights to the designs and got permission to produce them. China buys one or steals one example of what they want and then copy it without permission.


I don't remember the Japanese buying rights to any designs.

What are you referring to in particular?



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 04:38 PM
link   
The Japanese have permission to build things like the F-4, F-15, CH-47, etc



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 04:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by jetsetter
The difference between the Japanese and the Chinese is that the Japanese actually bought the rights to the designs and got permission to produce them. China buys one or steals one example of what they want and then copy it without permission.

The US and any western country would do the same if they needed to.



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 05:39 PM
link   
The allies copied the German tech and the U.S. copied some Jap tech after WWII. But we earned that tech we fought hard for our war booty.



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 05:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by WestPoint23
The allies copied the German tech and the U.S. copied some Jap tech after WWII. But we earned that tech we fought hard for our war booty.

So?
That doesnt make it "right", certianly not honourble.



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 08:11 PM
link   
Well it was either use the tech or let the Soviets surpass us in military technology.
When the Soviets were invading England you could have told them " shame on you communist we are honorable because we don't copy tech, you can bomb us but we will die know that we were honorable".



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 08:38 PM
link   
I'm assuming that if the soviets invaded the british isles.. they would not stop with just "England"



posted on Apr, 17 2005 @ 09:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by devilwasp

Originally posted by WestPoint23
The allies copied the German tech and the U.S. copied some Jap tech after WWII. But we earned that tech we fought hard for our war booty.

So?
That doesnt make it "right", certianly not honourble.


Very few designs were directly copied. Most were for research. The V-1 and V-2 were copied by very quickly withdrawn. The US studied captured German technology. It was a war, that is what you do. China did not have a war lately to justify copying US and European technology.



posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 04:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by WestPoint23
Well it was either use the tech or let the Soviets surpass us in military technology.

Yes , your point is?


When the Soviets were invading England you could have told them " shame on you communist we are honorable because we don't copy tech, you can bomb us but we will die know that we were honorable".

...huh? ***Looks south of the border**...I dont see no USSR flags across the border...



posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 09:21 AM
link   
useless argumeant is this .stop it
nothing really come out of it


[edit on 18-4-2005 by mirza2003]



posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 09:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by WestPoint23
The allies copied the German tech and the U.S. copied some Jap tech after WWII. But we earned that tech we fought hard for our war booty.


What jap tech was taht??..
intriguing..



posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 11:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by mirza2003
useless argumeant is this .stop it
nothing really come out of it


[edit on 18-4-2005 by mirza2003]

Arguement on topic....you want to complain? do so.



posted on Apr, 18 2005 @ 03:56 PM
link   

What jap tech was taht??..
intriguing..


The Japanese had a whole array of small planes that used rocket motors to fly, they were never deployed as the war ender before they could be produced in numbers, and the Jap’s had jet aircraft too.



posted on Apr, 19 2005 @ 01:22 AM
link   
^^^ Nice didn't know that..



posted on Apr, 21 2005 @ 09:42 AM
link   
Just a note to people.

"Jap" is a derogatory term when referring to Japanese people, we should stop using it.



posted on Apr, 21 2005 @ 12:52 PM
link   
^^..REally??

I never quite thought of it as derrogatory..
Wonder why they may find it so..
Any guesses?
Derrogatory as some ppl find chicom/yankee/brit/paki derrogatory?

hmmm... intriguing...



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 12:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by Daedalus3
^^..REally??

I never quite thought of it as derrogatory..
Wonder why they may find it so..
Any guesses?
Derrogatory as some ppl find chicom/yankee/brit/paki derrogatory?

hmmm... intriguing...


More or less.

If you visit any Japanese forum, you will find that the word Jap is banned.



posted on Apr, 22 2005 @ 01:51 AM
link   
it is respected site not one sided like pak defence site where you can make mockery on other countery and there people.

all those # word should bannned from this site.





new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join