Originally posted by chinawhite
Originally posted by Daedalus3
SAys who?
After 1962 and 1964 any neighbour of China who had a problem with china would want nukes if they had the ability to do so.. Common sense!!
vietnam burma afganistan north korea.
Are trying to publicly humiliate yourself??!!
Vietnam, burma, North Korea??
Do any of these countries have ANY problems with China??
Notice you've quoted me saying
"any neighbour of China
who had a problem with china"..
These countries are chinese pawns for godsakes!!
Did you see Poland or Romania having problems with USSR nukes??
With your daft logic if these countries had no problems with USSR nukes then china didn't need to go nuclear!!

Apply your logic to
yourself!
And afghanistan??!!
i know indians first tested a nuclear device in 1974 but i was talking about the 1998 test which india blamed on china
Nobody blamed anything on China..India went nuclear for its own reasons and it would've done so much earlier 1990-95 or before if it hadn't be for
US economic pressure..
so what we're not talking about that. and india recived chiense urainium to
And did you check if whatever India received
(It was heavy water not uranium) was IAEA sanctioned or not??!!
No you didn't.. because you have a habit of shooting off your mouth before you load your head with the info
All Indo-chinese nuclear transfers were (pre 98') were IAEA sanctioned..ALL of them!! OKAY??
This is not the case with MOST Sino-Pak transfers..Those articles I gave links to and quoted give instances of all these transfers.. but you choose to
ignore them for reasons unknown!!
the whole indian army.......
wtf? What "whole indian army"...It was the indians that were underprepared/undersupplied/surprised/ambushed etc. etc... in 62'..
Which bl00dy source of yours says the WHOLE Indian army
(which YOU put at 1 million men in 62'

) was involved there??
Tell me or bl00dy apologise!!
en.wikipedia.org...
www.stratmag.com...
www.bcasnet.org...
wikipedia CLEARLY states that each side claims the other attacked first..
So wikipedia is obv. inconclusive
And the other 2 links quote the same
Neville Maxwell who I may have you know is a pro-chinese lobbyist in britain..
Infact uptill now I think he is the only "western" source which claims that India attacked china first..
ALL other sources dictate OTHERWISE..
Now are you telling me that only this Maxwell guy is the correct one out there and all those other western sources are mistaken??
Just do a google for "Indo-China war 1962" ans you'll see what I mean..
ONLY Neville Maxwell shows up as supporting the chinese version of events..
[edit on 11-7-2005 by Daedalus3]