It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
While the scientific merit of these criticisms is debated - the compounds have passed regulatory review in many countries - where concerns exist it would be inappropriate to ignore the potential disruption to vaccination campaigns due to widespread worry over adjutant safety.
Now if we do a really good job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive services, we can lower that (global population) by 10-15%.
If you want to get a child immunized and believe the child will be protected, surely its up to you and your conscience
Why if its so effective do they have to have immunity from being sued?
“Vaccine manufacturers fund from their sales an informal, efficient compensation program for vaccine injuries; in exchange they avoid costly tort litigation and the occasional disproportionate jury verdict. Congress enacted this deal to coax manufacturers back into the vaccine market,” Scalia said.
I think you have no notion of the costs of R&D.
We want to make sure that we are very transparent. People appreciate that, speed is not compromising safety, nor is it compromising scientific integrity.
Health official and political leaders will also have to deal with those people that don't believe that any vaccinations are safe. As well as those with anti science views as well as people that just don't want to be told what to do.
Those are all obstacles we have to take head on and we have got to make as much open honest and transparent outreach to the community to convince them that getting vaccinated is for their benefit and the benefit of the community.