It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: anonentity
Ummm... the entire reason for the existence of the Confederacy was because of slavery. States rights to keep slaves.
originally posted by: infolurker
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: anonentity
Ummm... the entire reason for the existence of the Confederacy was because of slavery. States rights to keep slaves.
No.
Learn history .
Yeah... History. The confederate equivalent of the 2nd Amendment - The right to own slaves shall not be infringed.
The Confederate Constitution is quite clear on the matter.
usconstitution.net...
The following is the complete text of the Constitution of the Confederate States of America, as adopted on March 11, 1861. The text of the CSA Constitution was verified at the University of Oklahoma and the Library of Congress and was marked up for Web display by Steve Mount. The University of Georgia has the original hand-written copies in its archives.
Section 9 - Limits on Congress, Bill of Rights
4. No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.
Article 4. - The States
1. The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States; and shall have the right of transit and sojourn in any State of this Confederacy, with their slaves and other property; and the right of property in said slaves shall not be thereby impaired.
3. No slave or other person held to service or labor in any State or Territory of the Confederate States, under the laws thereof, escaping or lawfully carried into another, shall, in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labor; but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such slave belongs; or to whom such service or labor may be due.
3. The Confederate States may acquire new territory; and Congress shall have power to legislate and provide governments for the inhabitants of all territory belonging to the Confederate States, lying without the limits of the several Sates; and may permit them, at such times, and in such manner as it may by law provide, to form States to be admitted into the Confederacy. In all such territory the institution of negro slavery, as it now exists in the Confederate States, shall be recognized and protected by Congress and by the Territorial government; and the inhabitants of the several Confederate States and Territories shall have the right to take to such Territory any slaves lawfully held by them in any of the States or Territories of the Confederate States.
Yeah, the Confederacy was all about slavery. Anyone else have some more bull to pour on?
Just like the Nazis scapegoated the Jews huh? I hope you're not excusing the behavior that lasted over 100 years
I wish you guys would read my 2nd post and then tell me it wasn't about slavery.
The colonists placed an explicit Amendment in the Bill of Rights against forced quartering of soldiers. Was the American Revolution fought over that issue? No... it was fought over a long train of offenses from England. So why did our Founding Fathers use up a whole amendment for that one relatively minor issue?
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Yeah, that is why they dedicated 4 parts related to Slavery... no big deal.
All the northern states "Emancipated" slaves between 1774 and 1804
the south didnt think the Federal Govt. could pressure them to abolish slavery, and thus.. a civil war broke out.. in order for the South to "maintain their way of life."
Nice try though, the emancipation proclamation was the PERIOD at the END of the sentence not the first letter that started it.
Dirty traitors to our Union they were.
He gave many indications that slaves should not exist in the US.
originally posted by: grey580
a reply to: infolurker
That reminds me of something.
I was listening to a historian talk about the south. He said when you know a little about the civil war that you know it was about slavery. When you know alot you know it was about states rights. When you really study and get a degree in it. You know it was about the states rights to keep slaves.
Consider a few facts that are usually ignored by people such as yourself: Northern General U.S. Grant continued to hold a slave for nearly a year after the war. In fact, it literally took an act of Congress to finally free the man from Grant’s possession. Northern General Tecumseh Sherman was arrested many times for brutally abusing several of his slaves. Conversely, Confederate General Robert E. Lee freed all of his slaves prior to the start of the war. That act by the military leader of the South truly displays that for the Confederacy, the war was only about states’ rights and a just rebellion against tyranny–not about slavery!
The one lesson I have learned from studying the 1860s is that one of the reasons the South lost was that Lee and even Jackson were loathe to kill Union soldiers. They would fight to win a battle, but once they had won they would work just as hard to allow Union soldiers to return home as whole as possible. Grant and Sherman had no such qualms about Confederate soldiers; they considered them traitors unworthy of the most basic of human dignities.
We are seeing the same level of political animosity now; red vs. blue instead of slave vs. non-slave, but still the same amount of intolerance and animosity. History is indeed repeating itself.
originally posted by: murphy22
a reply to: Fallingdown
The United States is a "Union" of "countries". It always has been. There are reasons many of the states weren't going to ratify the U.S. Constitution unless "The Amendments" were added.
Why blame just Sherman when such practices were an essential part of Lincoln’s entire war plan and were routinely practiced by all federal commanders? Sherman was just the most zealous of all federal commanders in targeting Southern civilians, which is apparently why he became one of Lincoln’s favorite generals.