White supremacist Stefan Molyneux banned from YouTube

originally posted by: Ohanka
I think he was banned due to his tendancy to false flag anything even remotely against him with his army of sock accounts.

They picked a horrible time to do it though.

They banned him because he was popular and using to much bandwidth to justify their business model.

If demonetised content isn't profitable then it shouldn't exist... And racist.

I don't know what a sock account is.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Censorship is the tool of cowards and tyrants.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Pretty simple actually. He called out Israel for it's involvement in 9/11. That's not allowed under any circumstances.

originally posted by: UKTruth
He was very very effective in the 2016 election - posting detailed data walkthroughs on key issues.
He will not be allowed to reach as many people this time around - hence his ban.
It's as simple as that. Election interference.

Update - now also suspended from Twitter.
Just as with other cases of high profile (read high number of followers), the social media companies are coordinating to help Biden win in November.

“ the left “ truly believe that individuals being followed on twitter and YouTube were the cause for their loss in 2016

They’re wrong

Their pathetic ideology has been WHOLLY REJECTED and they’re falling over themselves trying to discover ‘why?’

Just like a moronic dEmocrat mayor blaming other cities for crime rates in their own, they can never look inwards and see the true problems that plague them

Four more years of Trump is an absolute.
Eight more years of Republican is highly highly likely

Regardless who they cancel, their platform, policies and beliefs remain the same. So they will never be supported.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Censorship is the tool of cowards and tyrants.

Censorship is a great tool no matter your persuasion.

You ain't telling me your darkest secrets.

It was only a matter of time...

The first ones purged are philosophers...

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

Censorship is the tool of cowards and tyrants.

Censorship is a great tool no matter your persuasion.

You ain't telling me your darkest secrets.

“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”
-George R.R. Martin

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

I love Stef, he does great work. He is pretty easy to take out of context since he does long format shows and that's what they do.

Specifically, he's made comments about race and IQ that people look down on. What they ignore is, he's doing it to better help each group and not to abuse them. It's racial, not racist.

They banned Stef because they can't reasonably argue against his positions.

a reply to: DBCowboy
Doesn't the fact that you respond with someone else's words prove my point?

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: DBCowboy
Doesn't the fact that you respond with someone else's words prove my point?

It actually proves mine.

a reply to: Antipathy17

They banned Stef because they can't reasonably argue against his positions.

Makes perfect sense. These are the same group that thinks "racist" means "you don't agree with me and I can't win a debate with you!"

Stefan was a good, logical debater and a great source for news.

TheRedneck

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: DBCowboy
Doesn't the fact that you respond with someone else's words prove my point?

It actually proves mine.

Not trolling but this is interesting.

You talk about Censorship and then quote others because you censor yourself.

Why not quote yourself?

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar
a reply to: DBCowboy
Doesn't the fact that you respond with someone else's words prove my point?

It actually proves mine.

Not trolling but this is interesting.

You talk about Censorship and then quote others because you censor yourself.

Why not quote yourself?

I didn't censor myself.

I'm actually honest enough to admit that people are smarter than me.

a reply to: DBCowboy

If you belittle your own opinion and put forward trash writers than I have to doubt your confidence. Not your intelligence.

But let's assume the answer isn't written.

How would you answer?

originally posted by: Krahzeef_Ukhar

How would you answer?

That you're acting like a total dick.

a reply to: DBCowboy
And the sky is blue.

If I wasn't being a dick I'd be worried.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I'm actually honest enough to admit that people are smarter than me.

I'm assuming this isn't one of those occasions.

a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

found one video on youtube still. How banned is he?

he probably got banned because he has been caught numerous times falsifying information and making up out right lies.
ive not been able to take the guy seriously since he said feminists were taking over because one tin of beans had wonder woman on,it was one of a set, the other three were batman, aquaman and superman.

originally posted by: Antipathy17
a reply to: Krahzeef_Ukhar

...
Specifically, he's made comments about race and IQ that people look down on. What they ignore is, he's doing it to better help each group and not to abuse them. It's racial, not racist.

Sounds familiar. When looking at wikipedia to see why they were calling him a white supremacist they said under the paragraph "Promotion of white supremacy and conspiracy theories":

In a podcast broadcast on August 9, 2014 he stated that he did not "view humanity as a single species". ...
According to The New York Times, Molyneux is fixated with "race realism". He has hosted white supremacists such as Jared Taylor on his show.

Then going to Taylor's page:

Taylor has been described as a white nationalist, white supremacist, and racist by civil rights groups, news media, academics studying racism in the US, and others. Taylor has "strenuously rejected" being called a racist, and maintains that he is instead a "racialist who believes in race-realism."
...Taylor also asserts that there are racial differences in intelligence among the various ethno-racial groups across the world. Taylor argues that Blacks are generally less intelligent than Hispanics, while Hispanics are generally less intelligent than whites, ...

The Races—What Is Their Origin? (Awake!—1982)

Are There Superior or Inferior Races?

Recently, in the U.S., a study was made involving black children adopted by 101 white families of above-average education. Psychology Today magazine reporting on this said that the black children, in I.Q. tests, “scored well above the national averages of both blacks and whites, especially if they were adopted early in life.”

...

Going back a bit in the article:

ONE DAY a white schoolboy came home and said to his mother: “I have made a new friend at school. May I bring him home to play?”

“What color is he?” the mother inquired.

“I can’t remember. Tomorrow I’ll look and see.”

This true story illustrates that in a child’s mind there is only one race​—the human race. Indeed, that is one dictionary definition of the word “race.” However, obviously the human race is divided into many groups. Hence, another dictionary definition for race is “any geographical, national, or tribal ethnic grouping.”
...
Evolutionary Thinking and Race

In 1859 evolutionist Charles Darwin had his book The Origin of Species published. In it he taught that there was a competition between the different varieties of living things and that the best fitted to live in a given environment would survive and perpetuate their kind. The less fit forms would die out. Thus developed the saying, “the survival of the fittest.” In 1871 Darwin wrote a book entitled “The Descent of Man” in which he taught that men and apes descended from one common origin.

These books had a harmful effect on race relations. As anthropologist Sheila Patterson explained: “The theory of evolution replaced previous rationalizations justifying the domination of the white races. Since the latter had survived and been more successful than the other races, they must be superior to them, not only in organization and efficiency, but in every other field, including the mental and moral.” This attitude made European nations in the 19th century more determined to expand their colonies. It also helped inspire Hitler in his plan to develop a “master race” and eradicate the Jews and others considered unfit to live.

It is noteworthy, however, that both Darwin and most modern scientists agree that mankind has one common origin. As the Encyclopedia Americana states: “Mankind is a single biological species.” Science writer Amram Scheinfeld recently wrote: “Science now corroborates what most great religions have long been preaching: Human beings of all races are . . . descended from the same first man.”

So although the Bible was not written by scientists, yet it was correct in stating that “God . . . made out of one man every nation of men, to dwell upon the entire surface of the earth.”​—Acts 17:24, 26.
...

Compare the bolded part with my first quotation from wikipedia quoting Stefan Molyneux.

Is Jared Taylor also not a white supremacist, racist or white nationalist but merely a "racialist who believes in race-realism", as he argues himself, and as you more or less argued for Stefan Molyneux?

I don't think their arguments and false claims have any more to do with reality or realism than Darwin's BS, or his eugenicist fanboys, one of which was his own cousin.