Hydroxychloroquine Still Doesn’t Do Anything, New Data Shows

a reply to: Phage

It is illogical to use logic to talk to those who are illogical.

TheRedneck

a reply to: Phage

So you're saying we can believe any doctors that are not a member of a club?

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

Logic is never illogical.
By definition.

a reply to: TheRedneck

So you're saying we can believe any doctors that are not a member of a club?

No.
But proclamations issued by that particular club should be considered highly suspect. At face value.

The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.

a reply to: Phage

Logic is never illogical.

I never said it was. I said its use is illogical when dealing with illogical people.

TheRedneck

If that club is the WHO or the UN then proclamations should be 100% ignored

a reply to: Phage

So we can't believe any doctors, then?

I just want to be clear what it is you are trying to say here.

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

I never said it was. I said its use is illogical when dealing with illogical people.

So...smilies.
How very effective in attempting to make one's point.
Almost as good as a meme.

a reply to: TheRedneck

I just want to be clear what it is you are trying to say here.

No. You're just being disingenuous.
Again, as you are wont to do.

My point was clear. The AAPS is full of crap and has a very small membership.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheRedneck

Logic is never illogical.
By definition.

Except when it is...

a reply to: Nothin

That really sucks.
Like disco, but worse.

a reply to: Phage

No. You're just being disingenuous.

No, I was actually trying to be serious.

Do you think doctors should be listened to?

My point was clear. The AAPS is full of crap and has a very small membership.

OK, let me rephrase... should we listen to doctors who do not belong to an organization you don't like?

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

OK, let me rephrase... should we listen to doctors who do not belong to an organization you don't like?

If there is science which supports what they say, yes.
If they disregard science which conflicts with what they say, not so much.

The association has promoted a range of scientifically discredited hypotheses, including the belief that HIV does not cause AIDS, that being gay reduces life expectancy, that there is a link between abortion and breast cancer, and that there is a causal relationship between vaccines and autism.

a reply to: Phage

If there is science which supports what they say, yes.
If they disregard science which conflicts with what they say, not so much.

Good! Now we're getting somewhere.

BTW, how do you define "science"?

TheRedneck

a reply to: Phage

LoL ! Yeah : it's not awesome.

Maybe you'll like this one a tad more:


It's got a whole 222 views on yoobeboob !

originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

I'm not going to listen to medical advice from doctors that are clearly anti science

What makes it so funny is that you probably think that makes sense...

TheRedneck

Glad you find it amusing, there's probably a whole bunch of flat earthers in that organisation judging by the ignorance displayed.

a reply to: TheRedneck

BTW, how do you define "science"?

To the point; randomized, blinded, and controlled studies.

Does AAPS present any?

a reply to: Phage

To the point; randomized, blinded, and controlled studies.

So science is limited then to what is repeatable under controlled conditions?

I tend to define science as "Man's ongoing attempts to achieve perfect knowledge through experimentation and analysis." Do you disagree with that definition?

TheRedneck

a reply to: TheRedneck

So science is limited then to what is repeatable under controlled conditions?

That is not what I said. Not even close. (And thank you for quoting me.)
If you are going to continue with misstating me, as you have done before, I'll see you later.

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

Glad you find it amusing

Oh, I do! I do!

It's not every day that someone actually comes out and complains about scientists not being scientific. Sounds like an oxymoron to me... like "military intelligence" or "dehydrated water."

TheRedneck