It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We have agreed internally to keep them up just in case you decide to rabbit-breed yourselves back up to stupid levels.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: KKLOCO
Wouldn’t it be more productive to tear down the people that believe in its ideologies?
Hmmm. You were originally much further down the list but I just got you fast tracked.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: KKLOCO
Wouldn’t it be more productive to tear down the people that believe in its ideologies?
Hmmm. You were originally much further down the list but I just got you fast tracked.
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
Was there ever a better opportunity to dismantle this abomination?
Yes, it should be done politically but still. Is it private property different from state-owned statues? What's the problem if there is any?
IMO no one knows who paid for it so either they come out and uncover themselves or there will be crickets.
I'd like to see how they try to twist the double standard.
Is there not enough right-handed folks in Georgia? How hard can it be to organize something good that makes sense for instance?
What about tearing down some satanic statues and planned parenthood buildings once it gains momentum? 😎
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Joking or not, it's still disgusting. Are you testing the ice with deniability?
Liberals joke about loving satan and abortions untill it becomes a reality for some of them.
Of course you know nothing more than most of us about these stones.
originally posted by: RMFX1
It's on private property and commissioned by a private individual who has also paid for the use of the land it sits on.
Do I not have the right to be offended
originally posted by: peck420
originally posted by: RMFX1
It's on private property and commissioned by a private individual who has also paid for the use of the land it sits on.
Not that I agree with removing them, but are they on private or public land? I know the land was legally purchased by the stone designer's "agent", but it was also transferred back to Elbert County by the original purchaser was it not?
originally posted by: PapagiorgioCZ
a reply to: Vasa Croe
Maybe. It's still a symbol. I've never heard of the statues the left tears down but try finding someone who doesnt know these. There may be better targets but it would be a good place to start.