It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rwatkins
I looked at your last images jogava and let's talk about the third one. It looks like two intersecting lines on the left side of the rock, right? But the lines, if real would be masonry joints of assembled individual stones. But on the right side you clearly see it is one piece of rock, not stones with masonry joints. If it were these individual stones they would separate, and not be in one piece. This looks to me like a chunk of rock broken away after the meteor had hit the area. Sorry, still not buying it.
Originally posted by LadyV
Here's the thing people....to me, yes, it looks as if they could of been a part of something "built"....... it's a possibility...but no one as of "yet" can prove it one way or another. I have always felt that we have been lied to about Mars anyway.....but that's another thread. The thing is, if we don't have people who ask questions, and notice things that others may not see....we would be missing out an many things throughout history....keep an open, but intelligent mind.
Off to work
Originally posted by Desmond
You guys are closed to one of Humanity's Greatest Secret.
Ask yourselves this:
How would you react if you saw the same pattern in everything that you look at?
Wouldn't it feel like having a glimpse of death?
Think Illuminati and Symbolism...
[edit on 21-3-2005 by Desmond]
Originally posted by rwatkins
I think I get what your saying, but it is difficult to follow the english descriptions.
I think your saying that mortar was used to assemble the blocks, and possibly stucco or plaster was coating the stones. I am looking, but maybe not in the right places, because I see what appears to be fragments sitting on other stones.
I would suggest maybe adding some arrows and text to point details in the pictures. Also, maybe get some help with the english translation.
I do not want to sound discouraging, I think the pictures are very interesting. I think if it were true, it would be the discovery of the century. But I think the only true way to verify, would be to go there and look. I feel the same way about the anomolies at cydoina. The pyramid is very interesting.
Keep looking, nice effort.
Originally posted by spliff4020
Ya the broken english makes it hard to read. Im still up in the air about all of this. BTW--> I live in northwest indiana, on lake michigan. Just alot of dunes around here. I havent seen lines like that in nature around here. A small line or something, sure. But not like that one. Thats the one that sticks with me.
Originally posted by HowardRoark
What? That didn't translate so well. Try again.
I see nothing artificial in the Mars photos.
Normal geologic processes on Earth often produce rock forms with straight lines, regular joint patterns etc.
Many of these same processes are likely to have happened on Mars as well.
In any event, your theory is not supported by the evidence that you have given us.
Originally posted by Byrd
It was not built, people.
This is a meteor crater.
If they put a statue on something and a meteor hit it, you wouldn't be able to tell anything was there.
What you are seeing is rocks shattered by a meteor impact.