It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What Halon system?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
And if they weren't on patrol at that time other ships that were able to go forward into combat zones would have had to go on those patrols.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
I didn't say that we wouldn't have won, or that it would have made things harder without them. I said it gave them more flexibility and options. Having more ships means more ability to cover missions and put more capable ships where they're needed.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: TheShippingForecast
She's most vulnerable to fire in yard hands. Doors are blocked open, firefighting systems are tagged out, there's minimal trained crew on board...
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: TheShippingForecast
She's most vulnerable to fire in yard hands. Doors are blocked open, firefighting systems are tagged out, there's minimal trained crew on board...
originally posted by: TheShippingForecast
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: TheShippingForecast
She's most vulnerable to fire in yard hands. Doors are blocked open, firefighting systems are tagged out, there's minimal trained crew on board...
All true.
That’s why dockyard/ship risk assessments get carried out. To identify the fire risk and put in place steps to minimise that risk and mitigate any consequences. To prevent that welders spark becoming a major conflagration.
Heroic as the crew and firefighters may have been, there’s no way a major warship should be reduced to a smoking hulk while in dock. Just shouldn’t happen.
Negligence/incompetence.
Either/both.