It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Judge Emmett Sullivan has Lost His Mind

page: 2
36
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 09:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam

originally posted by: carewemust
Where the F_ck are the damn Republicans?


Fearful empty suits.

It's disgusting.

If Republicans like Lindsey Graham didn't have so much to hide, they would have subpoena'd Joe Biden's Senate Records after he had them sealed 3 months ago.




posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 09:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
Seems like the Federal Judge in the Flynn case has decided to not dismiss the case even though he's been ordered to by another Court!!

Has this meathead lost his mind or is he just being stubborn, or is he getting PAID ??

Looks like he's always been a Democrat sympathizer and Deep State supporter.



Washington, D.C. federal District Judge Emmett Sullivan is refusing to dismiss the criminal case against former national security advisor Michael Flynn, and is now arguing that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals erred when it ordered him to do so last month in a 2-1 ruling.

Sullivan, through his attorney Beth Wilkinson, filed a petition on Thursday for a so-called "en banc" review by the entire D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that the three-judge panel was improperly trying to force the district court "to grant a motion [to dismiss] it had not yet resolved ... in reliance on arguments never presented to the district court."

Flynn's lawyer, Sidney Powell, successfully sought a writ of mandamus last month from the three-judge panel on the appellate court ordering Sullivan to toss the case. Writs of mandamus are unusual remedies that order government officials to take a certain action; they are appropriate when there has been a "usurpation of judicial power" that is "clear and indisputable," Powell acknowledged.


Judge refuses to dismiss Flynn case, petitions full appellate court





You have to understand, as it was no doubt explained to Sullivan:
- Sullivan cannot dismiss the case, else this strengthens Flynn's case against his former lawyers;
- the problem is that Flynn's former lawyers on purpose sandbagged him;
- what Flynn did not realize when he hired them is that one of the senior partners at that firm is Holder, Eric Holder, yes, THAT Eric Holder, Obama's wingman;
- Flynn needed to be sandbagged and jailed for his credibility to be destroyed
- Flynn's credibility needed to be destroyed to prevent Flynn from revealing what Flynn found out about the Obama's administration support for ISIS, including supplying guns and weapons used to kill American troops
- Benghazi was just a small part of that affair;
- Billions in cash to Iran is another
- Obama committed out and out TREASON.

If Sullivan does not find a way to jail Flynn, it will be Sullivan's fault if the first black President gets indicted...or at least exposed...Sullivan would go down in (black) history books as an "uncle Tom", justice be damned...

THAT is exactly what this is about....
edit on 9-7-2020 by M5xaz because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 10:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Ksihkehe

At one of the Twitter links you shared, I came across this tweet from General Flynn's WIFE and BROTHER, telling Judge Sullivan that he and his evil backers will NOT WIN.

twitter.com...



posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 10:03 PM
link   
a reply to: M5xazMakes sense, this Judge is really going through lenghts.



posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 10:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Ksihkehe

At one of the Twitter links you shared, I came across this tweet from General Flynn's WIFE and BROTHER, telling Judge Sullivan that he and his evil backers will NOT WIN.

twitter.com...



There's a lot of material on that account.

I'm not able to understand it all in the larger context of events, but the Q researchers could probably have a decent go at it. I'd be curious if there may be some publicly available content, wikileaks etc., out there that confirms some or all of what this guy claims.



posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 10:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: justwokeup
They have something on him. He's being ordered to incinerate his career to keep Flynn tied up at least until November. Whatever it is it must be bad.


I've been keeping an eye on this Twitter account for a while. I can't confirm any of it, but the content is interesting.

John here to help part 1

John here to help part 2

There's other interesting stuff there as well. I'm not sure if the Q crew is on to this Twitter yet. If so they may have ideas about who he is. Sullivan seems to have a lot of skeletons and shady dealings.

Wow, there’s some damning pieces to the puzzle in that read. Sullivan being a Sorros puppet certainly wouldn’t be a big surprise.

Is it normal to have 42 people on the board of directors of anything? I know some companies have a lot but 42?



posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 11:33 PM
link   
He has to die on this hill. If he does not his family, friends, associates will never forgive him. He will forever be considered a traitor to them even though he knows he is wrong. He must do it or live a living hell.



posted on Jul, 9 2020 @ 11:56 PM
link   
Sullivan needs removed from office.

It's crazy that a judge thinks he has more authority than the DOJ and the POTUS.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 12:33 AM
link   
I have a question. Since he won’t drop it, who’s going to prosecute?



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 01:35 AM
link   
a reply to: M5xaz

That's an excellent analysis. Thank-you!

So what does Sullivan do if the full appeals court says, "Let Flynn Go" ??

Is there another "tool" at his disposal to keep the General twisting in the wind of uncertainty?



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Ksihkehe

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Ksihkehe

At one of the Twitter links you shared, I came across this tweet from General Flynn's WIFE and BROTHER, telling Judge Sullivan that he and his evil backers will NOT WIN.

twitter.com...



There's a lot of material on that account.

I'm not able to understand it all in the larger context of events, but the Q researchers could probably have a decent go at it. I'd be curious if there may be some publicly available content, wikileaks etc., out there that confirms some or all of what this guy claims.


"JohnHereToHelp" received quite a bit of attention in the Q-world, late in 2019. But after many of his predictions didn't pan out, he was no longer taken seriously by experienced students of Q.

This guy named Austin Seibert was a shooting star in Q-land, who crashed and burned quickly too.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 02:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: M5xaz

That's an excellent analysis. Thank-you!

So what does Sullivan do if the full appeals court says, "Let Flynn Go" ??

Is there another "tool" at his disposal to keep the General twisting in the wind of uncertainty?



He will claim that the appeals court ruled against him because of "racism".
Incoming, sadly....



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 02:45 AM
link   
1. Maybe Sullivan knows something we don't know about Flynn.

2. Maybe someone knows something about Sullivan and is forcing him to do that or will expose him.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 04:18 AM
link   
You better hope R's take the House and Senate. Impeach and remove.

Only way to remove Emmet.

And he does need to be removed in the worse way.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 04:29 AM
link   
I think this judge had forgotten what his role is as a judge.

he is to JUDGE THE FACTS/CASE PRESENTED TO HIM.

to be the "referee" (for lack of a more simple term) during the trial to see all LAWS/RULES are followed by both sides.
when a question comes up to look AT THE LAW and see what / how it applies or doesnt.

then judge guilt or innocent based ON THE FACTS or baring that implement the agreement by both sides.

he DOES NOT BRING CHARGES OR PROSECUTE ANYONE.

if the plaintiff DROPS THE CASE (aka wont prosecute ) he can do nothing about it .

how in hell does he get away with this?

isnt there a state or federal court that can censure him and remove him from the case for judicial misconduct ?

what first scares me is the appellate court and supreme court are not stepping in to STOP THIS INJUSTICE.

clearly he has gone off the legal rails on the most basic concept "we the prosecution drop the case/ all charges" so the CASE IS DISMISSED. even a first year pre law student knows this.

but what is more terrifying that that is if this legal precedence is allowed to stand then ANY AND ALL JUDGES SUDDENLY HAVE THE POWER OF CHARGING (outside of contempt of court) , PROSECUTOR AND JURY ALL IN ONE.

imagine the abuse of power this can cause with no check/balance (much less constitutional rights).


something that can be TURNED ON ANYONE and cant be stopped when trump/trump supporter isnt the one being charged.


your looking at a french revolution turning on one self combined with a true "judge dredd" situation

scrounger



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 05:05 AM
link   
a reply to: scrounger

Well said. You summed up how I and I’m sure most everyone feels.
I’m just wondering what is his trial going to look like. Flynn, his attorney, and Sullivan standing around with no prosecutor. Just scratching their asses and whistling on the clock.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 07:36 AM
link   
a reply to: SKEPTEK

You might want to read this.

Your idea of "judicial independence" seems to come from this.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 08:33 AM
link   

edit on 10-7-2020 by Guiltyguitarist because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 10:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
a reply to: SKEPTEK

You might want to read this.

Your idea of "judicial independence" seems to come from this.


Enjoy your socialism, commie.



posted on Jul, 10 2020 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Boadicea
Nope..this guy is something else..look into his past cases..I know wiki..but..

E. Sullivan

Blumenthal vs Trump


As District Court judge, Judge Sullivan presided over a lawsuit involving President Trump, which challenged payments by foreign governments to Trump-owned hotels.[19] Sullivan granted in part and denied in part the Trump team's motion to dismiss for lack of standing;[20] denied the motion to dismiss for failure to state claim;[21] and certified interlocutory appeal.[22] On February 7, 2020, in a per curiam decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that individual members of Congress lacked standing to bring action against the president.[22][23] The court, finding in favor of Trump, reversed and remanded Sullivan's holding that the members of Congress had standing to sue, and instructed him to dismiss the complaint.[24]




top topics



 
36
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join