It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Pentagon says No Corroborating Evidence on the most recent Democrat Fake Russian Fable

page: 7
<< 4  5  6   >>

log in


posted on Jul, 1 2020 @ 05:43 PM

Totally exonerated


What a surprise

The dEms lies are exposed long before they even tell them

posted on Jul, 1 2020 @ 06:55 PM
a reply to: xuenchen

Lies is all they have. Do you actually believe the poll numbers they are releasing? I know there will be democrats/socialists/communists/anarchists whom will vote for Biden. But what about conservative democrats? Do you think conservative democrats can't see that Biden does not have the mental acuity to be POTUS? The man can barely speak. It seems that he is close to late stage alzheimers. He cannot make a coherent sentence. He forgets what he was talking about mid-sentence. He forgets where he is at, and thinks that he is somewhere else frequently. He has to be monitored with an ear piece, and even with the help of his staff, scripted questions from the left-wing media that only keeps on throwing softball questions at him, and he still struggles. How can that man be POTUS?... Is the UNFOUNDED hate for Trump a good, and valid reason to vote for a man, Biden, whom can barely function?

edit on 1-7-2020 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.

posted on Jul, 1 2020 @ 07:05 PM
a reply to: ElectricUniverse

My guess is all the "polls" are tainted and rigged.

Anybody considering a vote for Biden must be totally MSM brainwashed 😎

posted on Jul, 1 2020 @ 08:17 PM
As usual the democrats blame shift - the only forUN power that would pay to kill US soldiers is from the costal cities of America.

I'm sure Hillary has some special Begazhi undies for date nights with the crucifix
edit on 1-7-2020 by circuitsports because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 1 2020 @ 08:21 PM

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: face23785

Lol "dry up the intel sources" do you even know what you're babbling about? The intel source is captured Taliban, raids and IT monitoring. How could that possibly dry up because of a NYT article?

No dear, the source of that info is from an unknown and unnamed source. The NYT did not actually speak with captured Taliban, nor were they involved in raids and IT monitoring. This all came from two "sources" one of whom is "military" that--for some unknown reason--potentially leaked classified information. The NSA and the Pentagon appear to refute the NYT's mysterious source. Considering that the NYT got its info wrong on a number of high profiles this far, why trust them now? Why all shabby attempts by all the same media culprits to, once again, falsely tie trump to Russia? Nancy went so far as to allege that the Russians must have something on trump since we're not at war with them yet... So gullible.
edit on 1-7-2020 by timequake because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 2 2020 @ 01:13 AM
a reply to: fencesitter85

Since our own intelligence services have known to, oh I don't know, bald face lie has absolutely nothing to do with anything, right???

Putin could tell me the sky is blue, and I'd open a window to check...same thing with the CIA. Anyone who thinks that is a traitor??? So be it. Now then...anything to add to your defamation of members who dare disagree with you?

posted on Jul, 2 2020 @ 08:50 AM

originally posted by: lightedhype
a reply to: SKEPTEK

The same Covid 'hoax' that your leader has let kill 150 thousand American citizens? On a global stage of embarrassment no doubt. That hoax?

Can you list the facts that prove a single leader is responsible for such a problem? I'd imagine someone could be focusing on something more important if they weren't winning an impeachment case.
edit on 2-7-2020 by Mailman because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 2 2020 @ 02:47 PM
I thought it was Boltons book that was taking down the administration. or was that Amarosas book? Or that other guy? Or those 75 other who wrote books.

There are leaks in this administration as well as information being withheld that is vital to National Security. Ridiculous

posted on Jul, 2 2020 @ 05:47 PM
yeah anonymous source and the trump idolizers accept it as true..I thought the motto of this place was "deny ignorance" not accept it with open arms

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: 3sixand9

Since when did ATS start taking the Pentagon at its word?

I know it didn't start under Obama

The migration of government cucks to ATS is what killed it

yup, you are totally correct. We should take the anonymous source as GOD's WORD and ignore those directly involved.

You make me smile.

posted on Jul, 2 2020 @ 05:50 PM
Well well well....


Schiff has so far refused to acknowledge that his staff was aware of the allegations. “I can’t comment on the specifics,” he said when asked by a reporter whether he indeed knew of the intelligence before the New York Times story. He has also acknowledged that Trump was never briefed on the intelligence.

But none of this has stopped him from complaining that Trump took no action against Russia.

The Federalist’s Sean Davis and Mollie Hemingway wrote:

Schiff’s recent complaints that Trump took no action against Russia in response to rumors of Russian bounties are curious given that Schiff himself took no action after his top staff were briefed by intelligence officials. As chairman of the intelligence committee, Schiff had the authority to immediately brief the full committee and convene hearings on the matter. Schiff, however, did nothing. He did not brief his committee on the matter, nor did he brief the gang of 8, which consists of top congressional leadership in both chambers.

However, now Schiff is demanding that the Trump administration brief all of Congress about the unverified allegations, although he himself did not ask for a briefing of the Intelligence Committee following the February briefing of his own staff, as Davis and Hemingway pointed out.

posted on Jul, 2 2020 @ 06:35 PM
listened to a presser today where someone directly in the know said yes they were aware of the initial intelligence and that they had found nothing to coroborate the story.

That is why the CIA analyst whos job it is to sort through the intel reports never took it to the president, its why the pentagon said no other evidence to support the claim.

Since the Times ran with an AH HA we got him this time (time number 735) those bad guys (if its true) now know people are on the trail and will take steps to cover up their involvment making it harder to find.

I hope they find the military memeber that leaked it and toss em in leavenworth for 20 years of turning big rocks into little rocks and little rocks into sand.

top topics

<< 4  5  6   >>

log in