It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Pentagon says No Corroborating Evidence on the most recent Democrat Fake Russian Fable

page: 3
45
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 01:45 PM
link   
Whoever leaked this to the Times should be prosecuted.




posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Spiramirabilis

Another "Anonymous" sources New York Times BS story 不不不不不不不突突



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
Whoever leaked this to the Times should be prosecuted.

Oh yeah?
Leaking classified intelligence is a no no?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 01:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: face23785
Whoever leaked this to the Times should be prosecuted.

Oh yeah?
Leaking classified intelligence is a no no?


It should be to print it too. This is getting out of hand.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: face23785
Whoever leaked this to the Times should be prosecuted.


I'd say the public has a right to know why their sons& daughters are dying.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple
Because they chose to serve?
It is kind of a dangerous occupation, no?
They weren't drafted, right?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple

originally posted by: face23785
Whoever leaked this to the Times should be prosecuted.


I'd say the public has a right to know why their sons& daughters are dying.


Read the article in the OP. You're unlikely to ever find out the truth behind this because our intelligence services were still trying to figure this out and the Times publishing this story is going to dry up our intel sources on the matter.

So yeah, if you really care about finding that out, you should be mad at the Times. But this is all about getting Trump for most people, so I'm gonna guess you don't give a # that the media just blew an intelligence operation.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody


Just a hunch - but probably there are a bunch of people right now that don't want anybody to dig too deep for the truth on this one



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Because they volunteer to serve they're expendable? For no other reason than their commander-in-chief doesn't want to step on his pimp's toes?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen




Another "Anonymous" sources New York Times BS story 不不不不不不不


Feeling lucky xuenchen?


edit on 6/30/2020 by Spiramirabilis because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Lol "dry up the intel sources" do you even know what you're babbling about? The intel source is captured Taliban, raids and IT monitoring. How could that possibly dry up because of a NYT article?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: Spiramirabilis
a reply to: shooterbrody


Just a hunch - but probably there are a bunch of people right now that don't want anybody to dig too deep for the truth on this one




I wouldn't wager against that.
Trump would make them all crap themselves if he pulled ALL our troops home right now because of this.
After all he campaigned on bringing them home.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: face23785

Lol "dry up the intel sources" do you even know what you're babbling about? The intel source is captured Taliban, raids and IT monitoring. How could that possibly dry up because of a NYT article?


You're uninformed. Even the NYT article said there were numerous intel streams. Of course they won't ALL dry up. But it takes numerous angles to verify. That's why intelligence is such a tricky game.

But thanks for proving all you care about is exploiting this to hurt Trump.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: shooterbrody

Because they volunteer to serve they're expendable? For no other reason than their commander-in-chief doesn't want to step on his pimp's toes?

Expendable?
Who said that?
Only you that I see.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: face23785

Lol "dry up the intel sources" do you even know what you're babbling about? The intel source is captured Taliban, raids and IT monitoring. How could that possibly dry up because of a NYT article?


Is it now?
Where did you obtain that info?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

You said



Because they chose to serve?
It's kind of a dangerous occupation, no?

How did you mean it if not as "their death doesn't matter, they decided to do that"?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:21 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

I posted that earlier, how about you read the thread if you want to be part of the conversation?



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Peeple
Lol
Nice english to english translation.
I meant what I typed, which is in no way what you typed.
Did they volunteer?
Is it a dangerous job?

Interesting you failed to answer both questions.



posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: shooterbrody

I posted that earlier, how about you read the thread if you want to be part of the conversation?

No thanks.

Your translations are wonky.





posted on Jun, 30 2020 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: shooterbrody

I posted that earlier, how about you read the thread if you want to be part of the conversation?

No thanks.

Your translations are wonky.




All he posted was another anonymously sourced article and falsely claimed the military was the source.



new topics

top topics



 
45
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join