It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

SCOTUS blocks controversial abortion law

page: 2
10
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN

Why is any law on abortion controversial




posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 01:56 PM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN

1. If you think Trump stacked the deck in any way as it relates to Justice Roberts, you may want to check your history and a calendar. You are trying to take a jab at your political rivals, and have no fist to punch with. And it looks utterly absurd to someone who thinks both sides are petulant children in need of a spanking.

2. I am completely unsure why you are making something partisan out of this when you seem to support the decision. So...do you support the decision because you support abortion? Or because it gave you a chance to gloat online about a political win?

3. Justice Roberts is the absolute worst. I value him slightly below radioactive medical waste.

4. The decision is the right decision. If you want to outlaw abortion, then find an actual impetus. Cut the end around garbage, its only causing folks like the OP here to signal their virtues in online arguing.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: DanDanDat




fear mongering from the left over these issues was unwarranted?


The 'fear mongering' from the left was pale in comparison to the rights rapture over the GOP picking judges. Seems this is what was unwarranted.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:00 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66




But the blatant hypocrisy of the Leftists looking the other way on millions and millions of abortions is and has always been very telling.


Hypocrisy is calling yourself Pro-Life and a Conservative. Conservatives are Pro Birth.

They give not one iota of care for life. Only birth.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: Bluntone22




So what exactly is the undo burden that was so terrible?


I don't know, but I imagine it would be in the decision. What is important here is the conservative point of view has been shown time and again to be unconstitutional.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: RazorV66




It’s disgusting to see Leftists celebrate substandard post abortion care.


Where is this 'substandard post abortion care.' Any studies?

Would Universal Healthcare help this substandard in health care?



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: American-philosopher




Roberts is a problem!


The problem is with conservative thought processes. It is ruled by fear.

They going to take your guns!
Socialist!
Communist!
Lizards!
Cannibals!
Benghazi!
Pizza!
Weed is bad!

One day they will grow up and realize the futility of their folly. Maybe then we can move forward.


(post by ErEhWoN removed for political trolling and baiting)

posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:17 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan




1. If you think Trump stacked the deck in any way as it relates to Justice Roberts, you may want to check your history and a calendar.


If you think I mentioned Trump in my post, you may want to check your reading glasses.




I am completely unsure why you are making something partisan out of this when you seem to support the decision.


I don't think there are any Democrats suing to restrict access to abortions. That this is partisan goes without saying.




So...do you support the decision because you support abortion?


I don't support abortion, no.




3. Justice Roberts is the absolute worst. I value him slightly below radioactive medical waste.


This brings me great pleasure, and a warm fuzzy feeling all over. Along with all the conservatives here posting of their fear, it's been good times here.




to signal their virtues in online arguing.


The internet is not a place to argue. I report, you decide.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN

Partisan would imply that all democrats feel one way, all republicans another.

You may not have mentioned Trump, but you did mention a stacking of the deck that could have never happened prior to him, at least not until prior to Obama.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: ErEhWoN
a reply to: American-philosopher



Roberts is a problem!


The problem is with conservative thought processes. It is ruled by fear.


Holy hell, just stop projecting already. Once Trump got any traction last election the democrat fear train was rollin' full speed and never stopped.



Even I almost teared up at the end



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN

People's rights.....to kill babies.....awesome! This should be hashtagged #NoLivesMatter



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: ErEhWoN
a reply to: Bluntone22




So what exactly is the undo burden that was so terrible?


I don't know, but I imagine it would be in the decision. What is important here is the conservative point of view has been shown time and again to be unconstitutional.


And that's what happens when you comment about things you know nothing about. The case was sent back because it's almost identical to a Texas law that was found to be unconstitutional - requiring doctors that perform abortions to have privileges at a local hospital in case something goes wrong.

The mother's lives don't matter to these abortion doctors, they're just collecting money for killing babies. And to your other points:


The problem is with conservative thought processes. It is ruled by fear.


Right.

“The Republican Party’s position is that in person voting should remain the same as pre-pandemic times, endangering voters, election workers and public servants.”

"I'm concerned if we don't impeach this President, he will get reelected.”

"There are no more budget cuts to make"

"College women should not have guns because women fearing rape may 'pop a round at somebody'"

"There have been several people who have been shot by an unloaded gun"

"Non-union workers don't deserve to work"

"We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices... Government has to make those choices for people"

"We can prevent rape by telling men not to commit it."

"I don't really view communism as a bad thing"

"We need more gun laws because we don't have time or the manpower to enforce the ones we have"

"People do not have the right to unregulated rights in this country"

And the most dangerous quote ever stated by anyone - "We have to pass the bill to find out what's in it"

If those Democrat quotes don't make your skin crawl, you need to see a shrink.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: ErEhWoN

So what exactly is the undo burden that was so terrible?




a Louisiana measure that critics say would have closed nearly every clinic in the state


You don't think having every abortion clinic in the state closed would be an "undo burden"?

I'd have to double check, but I'm pretty certain this is about making every doctor who performs abortion have admitting rights to a nearby hospital.

...Yep"


The justices voted 5-4 to invalidate Louisiana’s admitting-privilege law in the first major abortion ruling of the Trump era, which came after the court struck down a nearly identical Texas restriction four years ago.
thehill.com...

It's called a "TRAP" law.


edit on 29-6-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: ErEhWoN



Seems the Conservative's plan to stack the deck in the SCOTUS is not exactly working as intended. LGBTQ, abortion, immigration... 


You think those are the reasons people would prefer conservative judges?

How cute.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Outside of the most lunatic evangelicals, i don't think anyone really cares about gays or any of that. There are assholes, sure. But i just don't see the logic in managing to what assholes do.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 02:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

I only asked what the undo burden was.
I gave no opinions on the burden or the ruling.

Having admitting rights doesn’t seem like it’s asking to much on the surface.
Unless there is something over the top in those requirements.
That might be the case.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Bluntone22




I only asked what the undo burden was.


...Not having access to abortion anywhere in the state.



Having admitting rights doesn’t seem like it’s asking to much on the surface.


They're limited...only so many doctors are allowed admitting privilege per hospital. They're expensive, highly coveted and they're unnecessary,. All at risk, late term abortions are performed at hospitals anyway, not at a clinic. Clinic doctors perform outpatient services.

What other clinic doctors is required to have hospital admitting privileges'? A podiatrist? Nope. Need a colonoscopy? That's an outpatient service that doesn't require hospital admitting privileges, Want a tummy tuck, a face lift? Out patient, no hospital admitting privilege required.

So why single out abortion doctors? Could it be a political issue only, that has nothing to do with the health and wellbeing of a woman?


edit on 29-6-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 03:29 PM
link   
Good. Abortion is like literally one of the very few things modern medicine is doing right. The only thing that bugs me is abortion isn't done nearly often enough.



posted on Jun, 29 2020 @ 03:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: BrianFlanders
Good. Abortion is like literally one of the very few things modern medicine is doing right. The only thing that bugs me is abortion isn't done nearly often enough.


care to explain this?



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join