Russia Secretly Offered Afghan Militants Bounties to Kill U.S. Troops, Intelligence Says

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Willtell

Beaus take on the matter sums up the situation rather eloquently.

It is simply not credible.
Lol
Why is that so hard to believe?

a reply to: shooterbrody

Trump's far too busy off autographing his pasty fence thingamabob approximation of a wall and bumping his gums about ChinA to be bothered by the likes of important intelligence information.

Obviously his admission understands the predicament, i mean why bother the Man at all, not like he would be willing to do anything about it, then, now, or next week.

a reply to: shooterbrody

What parts not credible?

The part where Trump did not know?

I tend to agree there.

Its never his fault, the buck always lands on some other poor fecker head where Trump's concerned.

It's priceless really.

a reply to: andy06shake
Too bad it is simply not credible intelligence and was treated as such.
There is no "predicament" other than BAMN resist people leaking whatever they can find to a willing msm.
You understand leakibg intelligence is a crime?

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: shooterbrody

What parts not credible?

The part where Trump did not know?

I tend to agree there.

Its never his fault, the buck always lands on some other poor fecker head where Trump's concerned.

It's priceless really.

How is non credible intelligence leaked to the msm trumps fault?

That is simply ridiculous.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Well if it is then Trump's certainly not guilty of displaying any intelligence. x

a reply to: shooterbrody

Tell me how the intelligence is "noncredible"?

a reply to: andy06shake
Because the potus says it is.
A briefing was held last night with potus and vp and they were briefed that they WERE NOT presented the intelligence because it WAS NOT CREDIBLE.

It is a simple smear.
Poorly constructed, easily vetted.

Keep preaching it tho.

a reply to: shooterbrody

Because???

Aye, Trump doesn't tell lies, that's never been known to happen.

So any intelligence is deemed noncredible simple "because" Trump says so.

I think i ken whats "poorly constructed" and it's coming out Trump's puss.

What a dope. x

a reply to: andy06shake
Well think what you like from over there.
The fact that no other msm outlet is running with this should be clue enough for you.
No worries
You get no vote, which makes you the dope.
Or foreign influence similar to the russians you rail against.
Ironic eh?
You are what you pretend to hate.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: shooterbrody

What parts not credible?

The part where Trump did not know?

I tend to agree there.

Its never his fault, the buck always lands on some other poor fecker head where Trump's concerned.

It's priceless really.

What's priceless is that you fell for another Russia hoax.

“I have confirmed that neither the president nor the vice president were ever briefed on any intelligence alleged by the New York Times in its reporting yesterday,” intelligence director John Ratcliffe said in a statement Saturday. “The White House statement addressing this issue earlier today, which denied such a briefing occurred, was accurate.”

Seems the 'intelligence' was not any kind of finished product as was not credible enough to raise it to the level of the President or his inner circle.

Looks to me like some unfinished and low confidence intelligence, being ASSESSED, has been leaked in a bid to blame the President for something he did not, and should not, have known about.

But here you are eager to run with yet another intelligence leak that isn't verified.
The reason the media keep digging and the Trump haters keep leaking is because they know there are enough willing fools who will propagate any nonsense they push.

Well done on being a willing idiot.

a reply to: UKTruth
Leaking intelligence is a crime.
Hope they catch and prosecute the leaker to the fullest extent of the law, or ucmj whichever is appropriate.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: shooterbrody

Tell me how the intelligence is "noncredible"?

Because the intelligence community can not verify it and therefore would not bother the President with conjecture and accusation unsupported by facts.

You've been played again.

a reply to: shooterbrody

What would be "Ironic" would be your POTUS and the rest of his top ilk never have been made aware of such pertinent information as soon, or soon after, it materialized.

I mean if you are willing to swallow that spoon full of Clorox, your willing to swallow anything the man is shoveling.

I wonder if any dead American troop's families think such information to be pertinent or credible?

a reply to: UKTruth
Those actively seeking to bring down the potus were not played.
It is their agenda.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: UKTruth
Leaking intelligence is a crime.
Hope they catch and prosecute the leaker to the fullest extent of the law, or ucmj whichever is appropriate.

Agree - this is quite serious too. Not some photo of a submarine.
The IC will have countless things arriving on their desks to investigate and try to verify. I daresay most of it never makes it to the level of the President, for obvious reasons. He has to act on verified intelligence.

Much like internal deliberations within Trump's inner circle are leaked and presented by liars as policy or decisions, the leaking of this raw intelligence is designed to undermine the Govt. It's gone a step further, though, whoever did this could have started a war and cost people their lives. Whoever it was needs the death penalty.

a reply to: andy06shake
Nice hill to die on.
Bet you believe bat boy as well.

No worries
Trump will get 4 more years, in part on the back of your beloved BAMN.

a reply to: UKTruth

Trumps the one whos playing.

But it's getting harder for him to dance between the raindrops.

God only knows what's going to come out about the Man or his mouth next? LoL

Fact is Trump doesn't seem to know his arse from his elbow with regards to much.

As to unsupported by facts i think you may find that's the fellows bread and butter.

Trump loves those in spades.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: shooterbrody

What would be "Ironic" would be your POTUS and the rest of his top ilk never have been made aware of such pertinent information as soon, or soon after, it materialized.

I mean if you are willing to swallow that spoon full of Clorox, your willing to swallow anything the man is shoveling.

I wonder if any dead American troop's families think such information to be pertinent or credible?

Stop embarrassing yourself.
You've had quite a bad few weeks of that.

Unverified intelligence is not going to make it to the President.

Oh, and no one ever said to swallow a 'spoon full of Clorox' You made that up - presumably because you are a little sore at being duped again.

The solution is to think for yourself. I know you can get there one day - you just need to start trying.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: shooterbrody

What parts not credible?

The part where Trump did not know?

I tend to agree there.

Its never his fault, the buck always lands on some other poor fecker head where Trump's concerned.

It's priceless really.

Trump should just say he learned it from the media like the rest of us. That worked fine for Democrats when Obama said multiple times.