It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Officer Rolfe had extensive training in subdual and arrest, as well as deescalation.
He had a higher culpability than a member of the general public would have.
He was FIRED in less than 24 hours after the shooting.
So, either the APD/DA has reason or Officer Rolfe will be gettting a large settlement.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: drussell41
They are already leaving.
I know, but this will be a lot more significant...
While running, Brooks appeared to turn around and point the weapon at police, he said.
"At that point, the Atlanta officer reaches down and retrieves his weapon from his holster, discharges it, strikes Mr. Brooks there on the parking lot, and he goes down," Reynolds said.
"The question that we have to decide is at that precise moment whether or not Mr. Brooks was in the position to cause imminent bodily harm to that officer or some other member of the public," Howard told NBC News on Monday.
z
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: drussell41
Ok I just read this
www.nbcnews.com...
While running, Brooks appeared to turn around and point the weapon at police, he said.
"At that point, the Atlanta officer reaches down and retrieves his weapon from his holster, discharges it, strikes Mr. Brooks there on the parking lot, and he goes down," Reynolds said.
The key words "appeared to"
I think it is very important. Does he turn around?
"The question that we have to decide is at that precise moment whether or not Mr. Brooks was in the position to cause imminent bodily harm to that officer or some other member of the public," Howard told NBC News on Monday.
originally posted by: bigsnowman
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: HalWesten
I just don't understand why people do that.
Easy to understand, fight or flight, sometimes both.
People freak out sometimes and I personally don't think shooting them is the answer.
Should people follow orders, of course, should they DIE if they don't....
No. The answer is no, they absolutely should NOT.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: drussell41
Ok I just read this
www.nbcnews.com...
While running, Brooks appeared to turn around and point the weapon at police, he said.
"At that point, the Atlanta officer reaches down and retrieves his weapon from his holster, discharges it, strikes Mr. Brooks there on the parking lot, and he goes down," Reynolds said.
The key words "appeared to"
I think it is very important. Does he turn around?
"The question that we have to decide is at that precise moment whether or not Mr. Brooks was in the position to cause imminent bodily harm to that officer or some other member of the public," Howard told NBC News on Monday.
originally posted by: JAGStorm
a reply to: HalWesten
This case is going to have much more far reaching consequences than George Floyd.
On on hand if the officer is justified, Atlanta and many cities will burn.
If the officer is charged, many police officers may leave, or protest themselves.
This is truly a no win situation.
originally posted by: MarkOfTheV
a reply to: JAGStorm
Was he just supposed to let him run off? That would have really made the public feel great. Or maybe it would. Rayshard could have posted a video online THANKING the officers and it could have been a big hullaballoo.
Who knows.
I don't foresee myself grabbing a taser from a cop and running from him. So... I'm not a good judge.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Tasers are less-lethal. Estimated lethality around 1%.
What is the estimated lethality of a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson or a Glock 22?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Tasers are less-lethal. Estimated lethality around 1%.
What is the estimated lethality of a .40 caliber Smith & Wesson or a Glock 22?
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
maybe...but being irrascible, ornery, and resisting arrest is no reason to kill someone. If that taser were close enough to actually hit him, i'd support potentially accepting a self defense type deal. But to shoot someone in the back is cowardly no matter what your reasoning.
originally posted by: butcherguy
IIRC, Brooks had not been frisked before he resisted arrest, stole the taser and ran away.
When he turned with something in his hand, the cops couldn't be certain that it wasn't a gun that he had on his person from the beginning.
Something to think about.