Originally posted by LDragonFire
Nygdan you sound like a good christian, and republican.
What you are really saying is that I sound like I am either laying or don't know what I am talking about. But rather, it is you who does not know
what you are talking about.
We live in a Fear society..and its getting worse.
As discussed, since you can voice your opinion publically, the US is not a fear society. The US is very much a free society. If there are any trends
torwards a fear society, part of i has just come from you, who rather than engage in rational objective debate, has desided to lob unfounded and
irrationally obtained political dispersions.
This country has not been so divided since the civil war.
An absolutely absurd suggestion. The US was far more divided during the vietnam war era than today by any means. Hell, bush has been reelected by a
majority. His conservative social programme receives rather wide support; witness the gay marriage referendums and the ludicrous schiavo case. This
is not to say that there isn't political spectrum and that the opposite ends are far apart. But to suggest that the country is as divived as the
civil war, of all things, is silly.
Free speech zones are afront to a Free society
How? All protests require permits. This is not new, nor 'christian and republican'. Its all not offensive to civil rights. The hysteria over the
phrase 'free speech zones', the irrational paranoia and fear of terminology rather than substance,
that is what contributes to a fear society
and will hlep bring down the free and open society that the Us and west is.
[...and what about the repubicans agin the cops on with shouts of shoot em all....just because we don't agree with them
Indeed, what about the extremists on either political end who call for absurdly extreme means? Republicans certainly don't call for 'shoot the
protestors because they are disagreeable'. Again, more hysteria.
The USA is not what it used to be,....all ya had to do was to have the supreme court appoint a man as president
What a surprise, more inaccurate and irrational blathering. Bush was elected president. The SCOTUS merely siad tha there extra rounds of recounting
were impermissible and should stop. They did not appoint him.
now look at where we are ....not number 1 in so many areas....not any more
Its sheer ignorance that can make a person think that this has anything do to with a two term president. The US hasn't been 'number one' in
anything for a long time, hell, longer than bush has been alive.
ghostsoldier
could all be solved if the ignorant public opened their eyes and did something about it...
Ah. So the people that do not agree with you are simply ignorant and blind. If only the american public could be as enlightened and have its eyes
wide open like you right? Maybe its time you and other like minded people did something about it right? Yeah, we've all heard that before. Anyone
can see where that goes.
noumenon
It's my street, I'm a citizen, I paid for it and own it as public property a
As did all the other tax payers. Your right to protest doesn't override their right to the streets. Thats why protestors have to apply for permits
and there has to be regulation and police pressence, to ensure that everyone's rights are properly followed.
Requirements for permits for protests weren't [needed] in '60s protests in the Us
Illegal protests happen all the time, and often rather than supress them the government simply polices them in preparation.
I'm not applying for a permit from anyone because I am guaranteed my rights, period, and I'm not breaking any other laws at all by doing what
I've described.
You certainly don't need one to speak in public. But if you are having organized mass protests, then you would be interfereing with everyone elses
rights. Blocking traffic, limiting people's movements, controlling what they do. That'd be mob tyranny. Thats why there has to be a balance. Thats
why assemblies have to be peaceful and in compliance with whatever local regulations are standing.