The government know something we don't about Covid-19

a reply to: schuyler

sorry sir. It was acknowledged a bit back, but late none the less.

a reply to: network dude

More reason to avoid being tested if you don't have symptoms.

One day, you might have to wear a big red dot on your forehead to warn people that you have COVID in your life history. You'll be treated like you're radioactive, everywhere you go.

============

BTW... Another study published recently.

STUDY: 455 people were exposed to a Covid-19 infected person who did not exhibit symptoms. (Asymptomatic)

None of the 455 contracted Covid-19. But the way the study's "conclusion" is written, it seems the result wasn't what they had hoped for.

Conclusion: In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection, and we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak.

Source for Study: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Bottom Line: GOOD NEWS.

a reply to: network dude

The virus is changing peoples DNA and turning conservatives into super humans, hence the lockdown to prevent too many people from mutating.. Dems don't want a race of super humans overthrowing them..

a reply to: carewemust

None of the 455 contracted Covid-19.

224 of them were in full PPE.

It is noteworthy that all personnel working in ED must take medical protection – namely, using N95 mask, putting on isolation gown and wearing goggle.

The statistics of 35 patients are displayed in Table 2. All patients also wore masks except for eating or drinking and were admitted to infectious department for medical isolation.

In total, 196 family members were enrolled. The situation on wearing masks was the same as that in patients.

224+35+196 = 445 Did I do the math right?
All of them were in full PPE or masked? For the entire time the patient was in the hospital?


The study is from a single patient in January.

The limitation of our study is that there is only one case and lack of detailed information on family members quarantined locally.

www.sciencedirect.com...