It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Communicable Pneumonia has Killed More Americans than Covid-19 - But No Pneumonia Hysteria.

page: 2
27
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:19 AM
link   
a reply to: nerbot
You're obviously satisfied with how things are going in your neck of the woods. Congratulations!




posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust


It is important to note that it can take several weeks for death records to be submitted to National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), processed, coded, and tabulated. Therefore, the data shown on this page may be incomplete, and will likely not include all deaths that occurred during a given time period, especially for the more recent time periods.


There is more current information available. But you wouldn't be interested, probably.


There are enough months of Pneumonia deaths to prove my point. And Covid-19 deaths per week are declining...not increasing.



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:25 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


And Covid-19 deaths per week are declining...not increasing.
Everywhere?

Huh. I wonder if social distancing has anything to do with that.



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust




With those numbers, pneumonia should have triggered a hysterical economy-destroying panic years ago.

If the number of deaths due to pneumonia had gone from 0 to 90,000 in the space of a few months it probably would have. And should have.

If Covid-19 deaths spiked from 0 to 330,000 (1%) of the population in 4 months, it would NOT warrant destroying the Economy and making millions of Americans jobless.

Especially so when you consider that 814,000 people died during those 4 months anyway.



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust


And Covid-19 deaths per week are declining...not increasing.
Everywhere?

Huh. I wonder if social distancing has anything to do with that.

Probably not...since Social Distancing didn't reduce Pneumonia deaths. In fact, as the CDC chart shows, the number of Pneumonia deaths increased after the Social Distancing and Mask protocols went into effect.



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:33 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Your screen name is highly ironic.
Has anyone mentioned that?
edit on 5/19/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:47 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust




the number of Pneumonia deaths increased after the Social Distancing and Mask protocols went into effect.

Yes. It can take a while for someone to die of pneumonia.
But no one said social distancing would stop the spread, did they? In order to do that you need things like testing and contact tracing.

edit on 5/19/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 02:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust

Your screen name is highly ironic.
Has anyone mentioned that?


What do they call a Salesman under Quarantine ?


...answer: an Ad-Home 😁






posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:02 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust


And Covid-19 deaths per week are declining...not increasing.
Everywhere?

Huh. I wonder if social distancing has anything to do with that.


Hmm, at least it is scientifically proven that, heart attacks and strokes have gone down to a nice 0- Zero because of social distancing and washing our hands.



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:38 AM
link   
Just at what point did the enforcement of social distancing statistical change the slope of infection rates?



www.worldometers.info...
edit on 19-5-2020 by neutronflux because: Added graph and link

edit on 19-5-2020 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:41 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux



Just at what point did the enforcement of social distancing statistical change the slope of infection rates?


As soon as the number of uninfected people who were exposed to infected people was reduced. In other words, the day the measures began. Obviously. Do you think otherwise? Do you really think that would not have an effect on the infection rate? People would get infected without being exposed?

Instead of looking at global numbers, it might make more sense to localize a bit. Since not everywhere did everything at the same time, as well as the scale of the chart being a bit more manageable.

edit on 5/19/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

It’s pretty clear on the unemployment rate social distancing had a greater impact on unemployment than preventing the spread of Covid19



Vs




posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

So? No date can be shown when the enforcement of social distancing caused a statistical change in infection rates world wide?
edit on 19-5-2020 by neutronflux because: Added and fixed



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:54 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




No date can be shown when the enforcement of social distancing caused a statistical change in infection rates world wide?

Hilarious.
Of course not. Social distancing did not start world wide on a given date. Nor even in every state of the US.

Do you really think that social distancing had no effect on the infection rate? Seriously?


edit on 5/19/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 03:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: neutronflux




No date can be shown when the enforcement of social distancing caused a statistical change in infection rates world wide?

Hilarious.
Of course not. Social distancing did not start world wide on a given date. Nor even in every state of the US.

Do you really think that social distancing had no effect on the infection rate? Seriously?



So? It cannot be shown when social distancing had a statistical impact on infection rates? But it’s quiet clear when social distancing had change on employment rates?

Strange.....



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 04:09 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

Especially strange when the slope of infection should be changed on many levels to “flatten the curve” in the context less people congregating by not going to work, not going to bars, not congregating at restaurants, not going to sporting events, not going to concerts, not going to church, not going to zoos, not going to museums, not going to theme parks.....



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 04:09 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux




It cannot be shown when social distancing had a statistical impact on infection rates?

False.


But it’s quiet clear when social distancing had change on employment rates?
Why are you comparing global infection rates to US unemployment rates?

Like I said, If you want to see the effects of social distancing on infection rates, look at where and when it occurred.

New York for example.

By March 21, social distancing had reduced mobility in the state by 50%. On April 7, confirmed new cases began to decline. This, while testing rates were increasing. Since testing was increasing, it's highly likely that the actual decline began before that, about the same time that social distancing began. Obviously, since fewer uninfected people were being exposed to infected people.

covid19.healthdata.org...

edit on 5/19/2020 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 04:20 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You


By March 21, social distancing had reduced mobility in the state by 50%. On April 7, confirmed new cases began to decline.


Can you show that on a chart. Was there a change in infection rates two to three weeks after enforced lockdowns?

April 7 huh, or was it just warmer weather? When was the lockdown started? Can you sow a change in infection rates two to three weeks after a lockdown?

Can you show a change in infection rates in concert with the stoppage of large sporting events in the USA and Europe for example?



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 04:23 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Good job dude.



posted on May, 19 2020 @ 04:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: carewemust




the number of Pneumonia deaths increased after the Social Distancing and Mask protocols went into effect.

Yes. It can take a while for someone to die of pneumonia.
But no one said social distancing would stop the spread, did they? In order to do that you need things like testing and contact tracing.


That's a big fat NYET to contact tracing comrade.

Does the Constitution/Bill of Rights have no meaning to you? Do you think it merely suggestions?



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join