It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Unmasking names getting released...Biden is on it

page: 2
54
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
looks like Biden is about to be in a world if hurt. The first list if names just got released for those that had requested Flynns name to be unmasked.


This is a list of those who received the unmasking information.

It is not a list of who requested it.



+6 more 
posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
looks like Biden is about to be in a world if hurt. The first list if names just got released for those that had requested Flynns name to be unmasked.


This is a list of those who received the unmasking information.

It is not a list of who requested it.



Incorrect. It is the list of requestor and dates requested.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:21 PM
link   
Chasing the flynn leak
Who takes the fall?
10 years



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Incorrect. It is the list of requestor and dates requested.


The right really can't read! Amazing.

First sentence:

"Below is a list of recipients who may have received Lt. Gen Flynn's identity in response to a request processed between...."

It does also state that it has presented a list of the principals (2nd last sentence), even telling us they are identified, but there is only 1 identified requester (confirmed on document) on the list. Samantha Power.

Granted, it also states that the request was properly vetted by the NSA, per standard procedures, but I am guessin you really don't want us reading that line either.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
Chasing the flynn leak
Who takes the fall?
10 years


I think this here is gonna be the problem. There's not gonna be any way to prove who leaked it. We know it was likely one of these people on the list. But you can't charge them all with leaking it, you have to know specifically who did it. If they all just stick together, no one is gonna get charged.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Incorrect. It is the list of requestor and dates requested.


The right really can't read! Amazing.

First sentence:

"Below is a list of recipients who may have received Lt. Gen Flynn's identity in response to a request processed between...."

It does also state that it has presented a list of the principals (2nd last sentence), even telling us they are identified, but there is only 1 identified requester (confirmed on document) on the list. Samantha Power.

Granted, it also states that the request was properly vetted by the NSA, per standard procedures, but I am guessin you really don't want us reading that line either.


Read whatever you like.

You are still interpreting what you are reading incorrectly.

This is the list of those requesting unmasking of Flynns name.

And even better is many were requested prior to the Kislyak call....

Keep trying!


+11 more 
posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:30 PM
link   
a reply to: peck420

Perhaps you have a reading comprehension issue.

Right between the quotes you just gave is a sentence...


In this case, 16 authorized individuals requested unmaskings for /masked/ different NSA Intelligence reports for selected identified principals.


They then give a list of those who requested the unmaskings and when.

Hope that helped.



+2 more 
posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:30 PM
link   
This list PROVES the obama administration used the usa intelligence apparatus against a duly elected president.
No more debate.
PROOF



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Yawn.

I will take the documents own words at the value they will represent.


+9 more 
posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: Vasa Croe

Yawn.

I will take the documents own words at the value they will represent.


LOL...so you think someone randomly requested the information and just put Bidens name down?

Oh the TDS is strong with this one.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
They then give a list of those who requested the unmaskings and when.

Hope that helped.



16 individuals made requests .... list has 39 names.

Specifically, which 16 made the requests. Power is 1. The other 15 from the list?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lumenari
a reply to: peck420

Perhaps you have a reading comprehension issue.

Right between the quotes you just gave is a sentence...

"In this case, 16 authorized individuals requested unmaskings for /masked/ different NSA Intelligence reports for selected identified principals."

They then give a list of those who requested the unmaskings and when.

Hope that helped.



Not only does it clearly state it, but it would be amazingly stupid if they randomly passed out the unmasking results to people that didn't request it.
edit on 13-5-2020 by Halfswede because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
LOL...so you think someone randomly requested the information and just put Bidens name down?

Oh the TDS is strong with this one.


Yawn again.

I can honestly careless about which idiot runs your box. I do however, enjoy watching you guys literally kill each other to be right.

Better than pay per view.


+11 more 
posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: peck420

originally posted by: Vasa Croe
LOL...so you think someone randomly requested the information and just put Bidens name down?

Oh the TDS is strong with this one.


Yawn again.

I can honestly careless about which idiot runs your box. I do however, enjoy watching you guys literally kill each other to be right.

Better than pay per view.


So you aren't going to admit you were the one who couldn't read and just got called out for it? got it.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Halfswede
Not only does it clearly state it, but it would be amazingly stupid if they randomly passed out the unmasking results to people that didn't request it.


It's not random. The list of recipients most likely has offices which get a copy of any requests made, period.

I am guessing those offices are most of the blacked out ones.

It doesn't really change the fact that this is a the recipients list.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Halfswede
So you aren't going to admit you were the one who couldn't read and just got called out for it? got it.


When you give me the 16 names.

Not 39 that has 16 in it.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:39 PM
link   
Unmasking is not out of the ordinary. It's not even out of the ordinary to do so for blatantly political purposes (cf. Devin Nunes)

The Trump Administration is getting nervous and the echo chamber is rattling. Wonder why?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Vasa Croe

A lot of people on here who have ties to Russia...

Flar & Stag



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: LSU2018
a reply to: Vasa Croe

A lot of people on here who have ties to Russia...

Flar & Stag


All of you getting your money from the same place as Trump?

Paka, Comrade.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:42 PM
link   
What happened on or around December 14th or 15th 2016 that prompted so many of these requests on that date?



new topics

top topics



 
54
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join