It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Michael Flynn Judge EMMET SULLIVAN - Was He Suckered by -or- In Collusion With Trump Coup Plotters?.

page: 3
27
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 13 2020 @ 01:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
Funny you seek justice for some.

When the doj withdraws there are obvious problems with the case.




posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

Yes, I'm sure Judge Sullivan is very aware that the case is now setting precedent due to the obvious intervention of the Executive Branch into the judicial process.

I'm sure he wants to cover all the bases.




edit on 13-5-2020 by Gryphon66 because: Spelling



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Funny you seek justice for some.

When the doj withdraws there are obvious problems with the case.


This is merely a personal comment directed at me from you regarding a political act of the Attorney General.

So?


edit on 13-5-2020 by Gryphon66 because: Noted



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
The facts here are clear.

Yes.


Flynn broke the law.

Really? What law? The FBI agents who unethically interrogated him without advising him that he was under investigation and that he had the Right to counsel, and avoided going through the White House counsel - breaking every protocol they have in place for something like this - said in their (original now missing) 302 that he was not lying.


He admitted to breaking the law. There is evidence before the court that he broke the law.

There is a huge difference between an unlawfully coerced and extorted 'please bargain', and an honest admission of guilt.

Flynn's 'plea deal' is of the former persuasion.

For those reasons, the prosecution is guilty of criminal malfeasance and malicious prosecution.

Those, my friend, are the only facts that matter.


You are merely spouting nonsense fed to you by your chosen media outlets.

Talking to yourself in the mirror again I see...

#sothere



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:09 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

The AG made a request that is fairly obviously politically-biased.

The Judge is deciding the outcome of the case, not the DOJ.

Next?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
No
You have no idea it is a political act.
You are assuming such.
What if flynn did not lie?

Wouldn't you want justice served?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sookiechacha
a reply to: Gryphon66
From what I understand, the prosecutor on this case resigned from this case, and others, just minutes before the "dismissal" was filed. Additionally, the document used the now ex-prosecutor's ID number in the filing, but it was signed by a political appointee, not associated with the case.

The Judge is allowing for amicus brief's because of a lack of representation of "a party" to the case.

Woeful ignorance much?

The prosecution is the USG, represented by the Attorney Generals office, who utilizes lawyers to act as agents.

The lawyers are not the parties to the case.


I suppose that gives the ex-prosecutor, and others a chance to provide input to the judge

If you can find them, and get them under oath. I guarantee you, that is the last thing they want and why the lead persecutor resigned, because they know they are guilty of criminal conspiracy and malicious prosecution, and are #ting in their pants right about now.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:15 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Justice is an ephemeral concept, these days.

Judge Sullivan is presiding in this case and can ask for amicus briefs as he chooses.

Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI, Trump fired Flynn for lying to the Vice President.

If you want justice, surely you want the case to be resolved legally, right?

It's exceptional for the DOJ to act in this fashion, and Sullivan, as a representative of the co-equal Judicial Branch seems to me to be covering his bases to insure a) that Flynn gets justice and b) to cover his own ass.

What's the hubbub?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
Is the doj dropping the case illegal?

You are right this is exceptional. Acts and or documents must have been OUTRAGEOUS for the doj to take this course.
Or are you in favor of coerced confessions?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: tanstaafl

I'm just going from this portion of the judge's minute order:


Jin v. Ministry of State Sec., 557 F. Supp. 2d 131, 136 (D.D.C. 2008) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). "'An amicus brief should normally be allowed when a party is not represented competently or is not represented at all, when the amicus has an interest in some other case that may be affected by the decision in the present case (though not enough affected to entitle the amicus to intervene and become a party in the present case), or when the amicus has unique information or perspective that can help the court beyond the help that the lawyers for the parties are able to provide. Otherwise, leave to file an amicus curiae brief should be denied.'"


www.courtlistener.com...

I don't know or if the filing discrepancies played into the judges decision or not, but I wonder if it did.

edit on 13-5-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

The DOJ didn't drop the case.

Facts are important.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:26 PM
link   
a reply to: Sookiechacha

The Government has requested to abandon their representation of We the People, technically, in this case.

If Barr has additional information pertinent to the case, bring it to court.

Requesting that the matter be "dropped" serves no one. (Except, of course, the TPTB desire for mayhem and confusion in the general populace).

Remember when some of our friends used to be concerned about THAT issue here, Sookie?

SMDH



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: shooterbrody

The DOJ didn't drop the case.

Facts are important.

www.politico.com...

DOJ drops criminal case against Michael Flynn


Oh really......politico is wrong?

"A review of the facts and circumstances of this case, including newly discovered and disclosed information, indicates that Mr. Flynn’s statements were never 'material' to any FBI investigation," read the motion filed Thursday seeking to dismiss the criminal prosecution.


Nice try
They dropped it

Lol



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

You're making a semantic argument.

DOJ doesn't drop the case.

DOJ requested that the case be dropped; it's now up to Judge Sullivan.

Got it? Good.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
Nope
At this point politico is more credible than you.
At least they see the wheels of justice turning, tho begrudgingly.
You just hate trump.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Nope
At this point politico is more credible than you.
At least they see the wheels of justice turning, tho begrudgingly.
You just hate trump.





Thanks for your opinion, and yet again, this is not about me.

I'll repeat the fact for you, and then I'm done: AG Barr does not drop a case that is before a Federal Court.

Whether the case is dropped is solely (at this point) in the hands of Judge Sullivan.

Taa.



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66
The doj has dropped it
Whether the judge does is to be seen

Tho a judge continuing a case that the doj has dropped would be peculiar.

No worries the information activating tjis course will soon be released.

Table for 1 crow special?



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody

Here is additional evidence demonstrating why judge Sullivan is so afraid right now.

qmap.pub...



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 02:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: shooterbrody

Here is additional evidence demonstrating why judge Sullivan is so afraid right now.

qmap.pub...


Fraud to obtain warrents?
Hmmm
Imagine that



posted on May, 13 2020 @ 03:02 PM
link   
a reply to: shooterbrody




Tho a judge continuing a case that the doj has dropped would be peculiar.


A judge throwing out a motion to dismiss would not be peculiar.


edit on 13-5-2020 by Sookiechacha because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
27
<< 1  2    4  5 >>

log in

join