Canada Bans 1,500 Types of Assault Weapons

originally posted by: vonclod
At the time, the registry collected a fair bit of info..remember the High River flood in Alberta, in 2013. The RCMP went around collecting guns, they should not of known the location of.

Which resulted in the RCMP providing enough money for each person affected to purchase a new firearm.

Even after this addition, civilians in Canada out "gun" police and military in Canada by approx 67:1. If we "need" firearms to protect ourselves from our own government, we have a while.

I read that as 80% did NOT favor that ban.
From the the PostMillennia article thepostmillennial.com...:

Survey: almost 80% of Canadians oppose further gun control

originally posted by: DrumsRfun
a reply to: Justoneman

I love Canadians and I hope and pray they vote the bums out who did this like the PM and we will come to their aid if they ask in a heartbeat.

Its a joke here, people THINK they vote.
I knew he was going to be PM years before it happened....all you have to do is read the papers and the BS "polls" they say are real.
As someone already pointed out in this thread, 80% were in favor of this, yet I don't know a single person in favor of this and not a single one of us has been asked.
Years earlier, 70% of Canadians wanted this asshole as PM.
Its bullsnip!!

Americans have the same propaganda, ours and yours just tastes different, but still get us all fat.

a reply to: Justoneman

I would take any Canada wide surveys with a large spoonful of salt. There is such a high level of provincial variance, that the "overall" take can be skewed pretty easily.

There are currently provinces above 70% approval for this (and wanting more), versus another province with less than 50% approval and threats (to the Federal levels) to install their own Chief Firearms Officer to set their own rules...lol.

Give it at least 2 weeks before data with a bit more credibility starts to appear.

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: MykeNukem

originally posted by: vonclod

originally posted by: MykeNukem
Well thank God that their ridiculous registry failed.

So, none of our guns are registered anyway.

They have no clue who has what.

Good Luck with that.

No, restricted weapons are still registered, shotguns, bolt action rifles are not registered..previously they were.

Shotguns, semi-auto, and/or bolt action were not registered. Still aren't. Restricted always have been, yes.

They scrapped the registry for non-restricted before the database was complete.

ETA: I've had an FAC/PAL since 1991

At the time, the registry collected a fair bit of info..remember the High River flood in Alberta, in 2013. The RCMP went around collecting guns, they should not of known the location of.

True.

I didn't say I trusted them. They'll use whatever info they have against us.

Only problem is, only the legal owners submit said information.

Trudeau and the Liberals are weasels is what it boils down to I guess...

a reply to: andy06shake

The reason being the firearms they continually try to say are assault weapons aren't assault weapons at all. They just look like assault weapons.
Your dear leader is banning guns that don't come anywhere near being assault weapons.
String him up on the nearest Maple tree.

a reply to: Justoneman

Exactly. When I googled I somehow found a study that showed the reverse of what the trending poll said.... Shows how much they can be trusted.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Irishhaf

You mean an AR 15 isn't a military grade rifel!!

*gasps*

Next you'll proclaim that AR doesnt even mean "assault rifle."

The nerve.

FYI, the "AR" in AR-15 stands for Armalite, which is the corporation that invented/manufactured that design.

SMH

originally posted by: DBCowboy

The only firearms I own actually hug people and then give them a little kiss on the cheek.

Then my guns make a nice hot cup of hot chocolate and actually sings people to sleep while gently stroking their hair.

It's a beautiful thing, really.

Sounds like what you have there are sexual assault weapons.

Unless they vote Democrat.

a reply to: VictorVonDoom

The shooter in Canada didn't use any of those weapons banned, the weapon he did use was illegal and he killed a number of people with arson. Arson BTW kills 20x more people in the us every year than rifles of any kind combined.

Second the military doesn't have a term for assualt rifle. It doesn't even have a man portable weapon designed to kill as many people as possible, it would use a nuclear weapons for that. It's largest man portable weapons 30 caliber machine guns are used for suppression to halt enemy movement not kill as many as possible.

Special forces may use a bullet similar to that found in msrs but the lethality comes from years of training and sometimes more than 1 million rounds fired ia highly structured training environment as these rounds are not typically capable of effectively and humanely hinting deer which are often 1/2 the weight of many humans.

Seals are trained to shoot 2 rounds to the head if possible and 2 rounds to the body to disable and enemy and 1 to the Head to kill them.

So in the very best circumstances a super soldier with decades of practice, the best gear, training and 1 million rounds fired may successfully kill a person with at least 2 bullets, probably 3 at close rage.

Police who have more training than average people have a 1 in 10 hit ratio in combat at short range.

Which means that it would take a 30 round magazine to kill 1 person by a trained officer in combat - there are numerous examples where police hit a person with 20+ rounds and they still fought because of shot placement.

Where things go askew is where a gunman enters an area free of guns and is able to kill at leisure.

BTW Canada didn't vote on this gem of globalists doctrine, they should vote to remove vagina who barely won last time.

Hey Leaf Bros... This is a cause to die for. Don't let tptb do this to you. Do not comply when they knock on you door.

You want to understand how dangerous it is to live in Canada?

Its more corrupt than Somalia.

If you have in your possession an Egg sized rock, pocketknife,anything at all.......just in your pocket....and you are carrying it to defend yourself from any kind of unexpected threat you may encounter...you are a CRIMINAL IN CANADA AND WILL BE ARRESTED CHARGE CONVICTED AND SENTENCED AS PER CURRENT STATUS QUO PARAMETERS.

If YOU CARRY anything on your person THAT YOU INTEND TO DEFEND YOUR LIFE WITH....YOU ARE a WALKING CRIMINAL in CANADA.

You are forced to be vulnerable, you are forced to be in a constant position of weakness and to live a life where you are DOMINATED every second by an oppressive corrupt Government on every level Federal Provincial and Civil.

originally posted by: circuitsports
a reply to: VictorVonDoom

The shooter in Canada didn't use any of those weapons banned, the weapon he did use was illegal and he killed a number of people with arson. Arson BTW kills 20x more people in the us every year than rifles of any kind combined.

Second the military doesn't have a term for assualt rifle. It doesn't even have a man portable weapon designed to kill as many people as possible, it would use a nuclear weapons for that. It's largest man portable weapons 30 caliber machine guns are used for suppression to halt enemy movement not kill as many as possible.

Special forces may use a bullet similar to that found in msrs but the lethality comes from years of training and sometimes more than 1 million rounds fired ia highly structured training environment as these rounds are not typically capable of effectively and humanely hinting deer which are often 1/2 the weight of many humans.

Seals are trained to shoot 2 rounds to the head if possible and 2 rounds to the body to disable and enemy and 1 to the Head to kill them.

So in the very best circumstances a super soldier with decades of practice, the best gear, training and 1 million rounds fired may successfully kill a person with at least 2 bullets, probably 3 at close rage.

Police who have more training than average people have a 1 in 10 hit ratio in combat at short range.

Which means that it would take a 30 round magazine to kill 1 person by a trained officer in combat - there are numerous examples where police hit a person with 20+ rounds and they still fought because of shot placement.

Where things go askew is where a gunman enters an area free of guns and is able to kill at leisure.

BTW Canada didn't vote on this gem of globalists doctrine, they should vote to remove vagina who barely won last time.

Hey are you looking for work?...do you know what a Prime Minister is?....?

originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: Justoneman

I would take any Canada wide surveys with a large spoonful of salt. There is such a high level of provincial variance, that the "overall" take can be skewed pretty easily.

There are currently provinces above 70% approval for this (and wanting more), versus another province with less than 50% approval and threats (to the Federal levels) to install their own Chief Firearms Officer to set their own rules...lol.

Give it at least 2 weeks before data with a bit more credibility starts to appear.

This is BS.

There is no Province that agrees with this @ 70% you are pushing the Government narrative....stop it please....you are making me nervous......The polls were limited Urban polls....no Rural inputs....so totally biased and tainted.

Why don't you tell us all exactly what a Chief Firearms Officer really is....the entire history of the titled position beginning with the campaign before its creation. its intents and its purposes.

You see Canada is about to experience is own massive evolution away from corrupt Global Cabal influences very very soon.

The same Templates and methods of corruption have been used on the Federal----Provincial----Civil levels and there is a clear evidenced record of collisional sedative behaviour by all 3 Groups with the reward of mutual benefits to all.

Canadian gun laws are more liberal than American based on the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Canada is so corrupt and has been for so long that no one even knows their own rights any more....the bastardisation is so long running it has blinded generations of Canadians.

Canada Bans 1,500 Types of Assault Weapons

Never trust any government that disarms their own citizens.

I feel bad for the majority of people in Canada that just got punished for not even committing a crime.

originally posted by: neo96
Canada Bans 1,500 Types of Assault Weapons

Never trust any government that disarms their own citizens.

I feel bad for the majority of people in Canada that just got punished for not even committing a crime.

I foresee lots of PVC pipe and end cap purchases in the near future.

Canada banned the AR-15 amongst the other guns, which is what they’re calling a “Military Grade” weapon. Further referring to it as an Assault Rifle and talking about gun buyback plans (kind of what Hitler and every other tyrannical country did in the past). Why? Because a guy went house to house and shot people with a handgun. Makes senses doesn’t it?

Here’s a newsflash for you. Not once in all of history has anyone ever taken an AR-15 to war. It’s just a 5.56 or (alternatively) 223 Remington caliber round weapon, no different than a typical hunting rifle. it is NOT an automatic weapon and is ‘one pull, one shot’ (semiautomatic) despite what the media and the Government says. They lie.

It just so happens to “look” like something Rambo would carry. It’s a normal rifle with a scary receiver, hand guard and stock. Also, saying that it’s an “Assault Rifle” is an outright lie. AR stands for the company that makes them...Armalite.

Again, they ban the AR, when a handgun was used. That’s a bit suspicious. Why not ban handguns?

I’ll tell you why they REALLY banned it and why they want to ban it in the States as well? Because it’s competition for their rogue police. The Government doesn’t want competition. They want absolute control at gunpoint, and they can’t do that if citizens have compatible weapons. The police carry a weapon that looks almost exactly like the AR which is called a Colt M4 Carbine and is semiautomatic and 3 round bursts and uses the exact same rounds 5.56 NATO rounds or 223 Remington rounds. Ironic to say the least.

The banning of the AR-15 opens the door now to banning ALL RIFLES. They’re already talking about a buyback plan along with gun registry for all other guns.

Why a gun registry? When they’re ready to kick down doors, they’ll know exactly who has guns and what kind.

Although every death by a gun or any tool (including a car) is a tragedy, one must understand that this is an attack on the freedoms of “law abiding” citizens. It’s law abiding citizens that are going to follow these laws, not criminals or murderers. This move has effectively plucked some sharp teeth from the citizens so as to not be able to protect themselves, were anyone to enter their homes forcibly that were weaponized.

Why would you need a weapon with 10 or 30 in the magazine they ask?

Well, under duress most will not be able to aim properly, even with training it would be difficult. The adrenaline and fear alone would destabilize your aim. You would need more rounds to hit your target. Consider the following...What happens if 3 men, all armed, enter your home to rob, rape your wife and children or to murder you and you only have one round in your gun? Even 5 rounds? You had damn well better hit all 3 with one bullet, and then you’ll have two more left over to deal with what’s left. Still not good odds.

And don’t think that your Government or the Police will be there to save you from criminals entering your home. They couldn’t save the lives of those 22 people that the most recent gunman killed could they? The average response time for Canadian Police is 11 minutes, which would seem like a lifetime were someone to break into your home. You wouldn’t stand a chance.

Unless there are police at every door 24/7 and following you around everywhere you go, you’re now a sitting duck for criminals (just like what happened in the UK, who are begging for their guns back now because of the constant break-ins, rapes and assaults. Many of which are repeat business) ....if these police protection protocols are not in place, then people need a compatible gun to repel those who agress with the same guns that use them illegally.

So, you had better be aware of why your Government chose right now to take that specific weapon away. The Covid scare drove many to lose their minds and although it looks like they’re loosening the chains a bit, letting you at least walk outside without getting arrested, make no mistake about it...

When September gets here....Covid will resurface again they say (because they can see into the future apparently) and all hell is about to break loose. Between September and December especially. Just enough time for the Worlds Governments to re-strategize and get those Pandemic numbers they’ve been lying to you about. It’s been proven that they are accepting ALL deaths as Covid deaths, just to get the numbers, (although the media didn’t seem to get the message), so they can mandate the new and inventive nano-chip infused vaccine and force us to get chipped. It’s called ID 2020...look it up.

Beware, your Government is coming for you and they do not want you armed when they do. This is history repeating itself, but on a World scale. There will be no more chances to learn from history. This is it. The New World Order is here!

originally posted by: RubyRogue
Except Canadians aren't allowed to own a gun for defense and if one shot one on their own property in self defense it would be a manslaughter charge in the very least...also, they tried a long time ago to have a registry for all long gun owners but that went away as soon as it began... and so it begins...

No, no it didn't. It hung around for almost 20 years and ended up costing the tax payers several billion dollars for what amounted to a whole lot of nothing.

a reply to: WUNK22

Actually the opposite is true in general. Conservatives are much more like to approve of authoritarian rules. There are countless psychological studies confirming this.

My theory is cannabis legalization is a step to gun control. Let the population smoke weed all day and they will not protest strict gun controls.

a reply to: IlluminatiTechnician

An AR-15 is essentially the same as the M-16/M-4 just the civilian version does not have a 3 round burst or full automatic.

On page 4, what type of assult weapon is alien armory UFO - 10? It is z.o16