Brennan: Intelligence community vindicated by Senate committee's report

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: DanDanDat

2) that the interference changed the outcome of the election.

I don't think that's a hoax it's an unknown but the fact the favourite of the Russian leadership won the election when Clinton was forecast to win must raise questions.

Too reasonable.

Instead, it is obvious that Satanic Reptillian shapeshifters who live on foetal blood have infiltrated the government and control the minds (with 5G frequencies) of those who maintain that a multimedia advertising campaign with tens of millions of individual adverts over a three year period had any effect, when clearly such a thing is UNpossible™, because it was clearly shouted at us on a video by a guy who knew a guy.

a reply to: chr0naut

so what , they will always tow the company line .

a reply to: gortex

Duh

a reply to: gortex

I don't let others draw conclusions and think for me. Why do you?

And who can forget this from, ahem, the NYTs:

Obama White House Knew of Russian Election Hacking, but Delayed Telling

originally posted by: 10uoutlaw
a reply to: chr0naut

so what , they will always tow the company line .

Well, there's a glaring problem, right there.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: 10uoutlaw
a reply to: chr0naut

so what , they will always tow the company line .

Well, there's a glaring problem, right there.

RHINOS and never trumpers on that comittee make it unbelievable.

originally posted by: DanDanDat




The hoax is not that Russia did not try to interfere in the 2016 elections (or the 2012, 2008 ... elections). The hoax is in the ideas that 1) the Trump campaign/admin was complicit in the interference and 2) that the interference changed the outcome of the election.

Exactly this

The Trump campaign most certainly was not complicit and ‘ze Russians’ certainly didn’t influence anyone. Tens of millions of posts and ads is a NEGLIGIBLE number. Less than a single days traffic across social media platforms

NEGLIGIBLE

A poorly perpetrated media driven hoax. Full stop.

Trump had a campaign. He had policies and campaign promises that appealed to the people

His opponent most certainly did not

originally posted by: Breakthestreak

originally posted by: DanDanDat




The hoax is not that Russia did not try to interfere in the 2016 elections (or the 2012, 2008 ... elections). The hoax is in the ideas that 1) the Trump campaign/admin was complicit in the interference and 2) that the interference changed the outcome of the election.

Trump had a campaign. He had policies and campaign promises that appealed to the people

His opponent most certainly did not

Wash-Rinse 2016 / Repeat 2020

a reply to: carewemust

Well his opponent still has an agenda driven media, that is bought and paid for and has a mission-statement of lying to the public, working 100% for his party

That’s the ONLY reason hilary Clinton done as well as she did, THAT was the ‘influence’ we seen on the election

Anyone decrying Russian influence while openly supporting the anti-American influence of mainstream and social media giants across every country on earth posting and allowing BILLIONS of false posts and mis truths over a three year period, while banning, blocking and censoring as much pro-Trump content as they can, is a moron or is complicit in the BAMN standpoint

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: 10uoutlaw
a reply to: chr0naut

so what , they will always tow the company line .

Well, there's a glaring problem, right there.

RHINOS and never trumpers on that comittee make it unbelievable.

Firstly, there's no "H" in the anagram.

How do these RINO's recognize each other, do they have a secret handshake or something? How do they communicate so that they can be hand picked for special assignments? Do they have a special charter or constitution that they agree to?

Or is calling someone a RINO a paranoid accusation used by people who who want so desperately to think that they are 'right' that they have to 'out' everyone who doesn't conform to their delusional ideation of how other people must act and be motivated, and who cannot conceive of someone who who is motivated by ethical concerns, rather than a group membership?

What do you think?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: yuppa

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: 10uoutlaw
a reply to: chr0naut

so what , they will always tow the company line .

Well, there's a glaring problem, right there.

RHINOS and never trumpers on that comittee make it unbelievable.

Firstly, there's no "H" in the anagram.

How do these RINO's recognize each other, do they have a secret handshake or something? How do they communicate so that they can be hand picked for special assignments? Do they have a special charter or constitution that they agree to?

Or is calling someone a RINO a paranoid accusation used by people who who want so desperately to think that they are 'right' that they have to 'out' everyone who doesn't conform to their delusional ideation of how other people must act and be motivated, and who cannot conceive of someone who who is motivated by ethical concerns, rather than a group membership?

What do you think?

I know,i was trolling a bit with the Name alright? I think you described everyone who don't like trump there. If you are a polotician ETHICS is a silly notion.

a reply to: gortex

ROFLMAO... Instead of pulling another fake stunt by politico, perhaps you should link the report?...

If it was true that the "Russians wanted Trump to win" then how do you explain Steele's dossier?... Which were FALSE CLAIMS FROM RUSSIAN OFFICIALS CLOSE TO PUTIN...

How do you explain the anti-Trump rallies that the Russians also set up in the U.S.?...

BTW, what President Trump has said is that "the collusion with Russia claim is FAKE..." and it is true, it was all fake.

The DOJ has dropped all charges against Gen. Flynn, he is still bankrupt over LIES that democrats/progressives made up trying to go after Trump and anyone close to him...

A trove of documents were released, more are coming, including documents that prove the fact that Obama was involved in the attempted take down against Gen. Flynn.

New Documents Show President Obama Was in on the Flynn Takedown

But hey, Obama wanted Flynn to pay for going against him and outing Obama as the reason why ISIS rose to power...

...
Lt. General Michael Flynn, the former head of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), made an unprecedented, blunt accusation that the rise of the Islamic State (ISIS) was the result of a "willful decision,"—not an intelligence failure—by the Obama Administration.
...

Link

Defense Intelligence Agency warned Obama about ISIS in 2012

But hey, once again you have to lie about this because "orange man bad..."

originally posted by: elDooberino
a reply to: gortex

the fact the favourite of the Russian leadership won the election when Clinton was forecast to win must raise questions.

It makes me wonder, though. If Trump was Moscow's "favorite", why did they give damaging disinfo on him to Steele?
It's almost like they were more content creating chaos than anything else. Mission accomplished.

That fact has flown over the head of Gortex and other "never-Trumpers" for over 3 years now... They will never catch up, they are blind to facts and only want to believe anything that claims... "orange man baaaaad..."

edit on 8-5-2020 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.