It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Michigan medical examiners say “most died WITH Covid19 than OF Covid 19”

page: 4
22
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2020 @ 09:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical

originally posted by: SeektoUnderstand
a reply to: Grimpachi

If you have MORE testing...... you will have MORE positive cases, BUT same amount of deaths.... there by as “info”lurker stated using “basic math” the fatality rate would dwarf its current “inflated” percentage. THUS making the “danger” far less.


That is not true. More testing means less spreading which means less deaths.


Actually, at this stage in the game, more testing will mean you will see a spike in cases because it would reveal the true scope of the issue. Right now, there are a lot of cases no one knows about.

It's just like antibody testing, where available, has turned up a lot of people who actually had it. Far more than the testing revealed showing that the disease had spread out wider and through more of the populace than had actually been assumed to be the case through official figures.




posted on Apr, 19 2020 @ 09:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker It is real, a lot of people are going to die.


yes it is, yes they are, but the global over-reaction is still massively overblown. and duplicitous.



posted on Apr, 20 2020 @ 06:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
More testing means less spreading which means less deaths.

It definitely means higher numbers on the numerator side of the CFR equation.

From your viewpoint, it only equates to 'less spreading/deaths' if you put every single person who tests positive in jail.

Apparently you are one of those in favor of destroying the economy in favor of a slightly lower casualty rate (maybe - we don't even know that is for certain).

But what about influenza? Do we test each and every person in the nation for influenza?

Do you have the lawful authority to require - at gunpoint - that each and every Citizen be tested for this, or anything else for that matter?

No. You do not.

Doesn't it make more logical sense to help people to have truly vitally healthy immune systems, such that 99.9% are pretty much immune or will at least survive pretty much anything that comes their way?



posted on Apr, 20 2020 @ 04:40 PM
link   
Michigan officials are going crazy!

This Landscaping company owner is going to be arrested and indicted if he keep delivering mulch.

twitter.com...




posted on Apr, 21 2020 @ 06:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: Case74282

I am trying to not be insulting.... let's go with some basic logic.


If all of a sudden, you go from a 3 year average of say 1000 deaths per day from all causes in your state or nation to 2000 deaths per day this year and they are counting say 300 as Covid, what the hell do you think the other additional 700 deaths per day are? Where are they coming from?


Basic math baby.


Deaths from all causes has not increased like that though... Are you just making things up?



posted on Apr, 21 2020 @ 04:38 PM
link   
The Department of Justice is keeping tabs on Governor Whitmer.

twitter.com...





top topics
 
22
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join