It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Democrat officials angry Samaritains purse allowed to set up hospitals for Covid-19 in NYC

page: 1
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:36 AM
link   


New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, who tweeted a statement berating the development: "Franklin Graham has a long history of spewing anti-LGBTQ hate speech, and I find it extremely troubling that he and his organization are involved in our relief efforts in any way. New York City is known around the world for its embrace of diversity, and Franklin Graham has spent his career standing against these values. I will be monitoring this situation closely and making sure that our city's values are being represented at all times.




New York state Sen. Brad Hoylman, who tweeted that "it's a shame that the federal government has left New York with no other choice but to accept charity from bigots." In a statement on his official Senate page, Hoylman called Graham a "notorious anti-LGBTQ pastor" and said he put Graham "on notice" that Samaritan's Purse must "treat all COVID-19 patients equally at the new medical tents." Here's Hoylman's full statement: COVID-19 doesn't discriminate, and neither should Franklin Graham. It's unacceptable that a New Yorker infected with COVID-19 could be subjected to discriminatory treatment from an organization whose leader calls us "immoral" and "detestable."



Note that Samaritans Purse does medical assistance all over the world, for people of all faiths, and asks for nothing in return. That is how awful Christianity is according to the leftist liberals.

Interesting that the left and Democratic Party elected officials would rather not allow a Christian medical organization assist with the epidemic, but feel they have no choice but to accept tainted assistance from Christians. But that is the way of socialists, what is best for the entire society is paramount, accepting help from other political/religious ideologies is only done holding ones nose in a time when their is no other choice.

www.theblaze.com... -get-smacked-right-down




posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: The2Billies

I wonder if the items posted were crafted on iPhones made with forced labor in China?



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: The2Billies



New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, who tweeted a statement berating the development: "Franklin Graham has a long history of spewing anti-LGBTQ hate speech, and I find it extremely troubling that he and his organization are involved in our relief efforts in any way. New York City is known around the world for its embrace of diversity, and Franklin Graham has spent his career standing against these values. I will be monitoring this situation closely and making sure that our city's values are being represented at all times.




New York state Sen. Brad Hoylman, who tweeted that "it's a shame that the federal government has left New York with no other choice but to accept charity from bigots." In a statement on his official Senate page, Hoylman called Graham a "notorious anti-LGBTQ pastor" and said he put Graham "on notice" that Samaritan's Purse must "treat all COVID-19 patients equally at the new medical tents." Here's Hoylman's full statement: COVID-19 doesn't discriminate, and neither should Franklin Graham. It's unacceptable that a New Yorker infected with COVID-19 could be subjected to discriminatory treatment from an organization whose leader calls us "immoral" and "detestable."



Note that Samaritans Purse does medical assistance all over the world, for people of all faiths, and asks for nothing in return. That is how awful Christianity is according to the leftist liberals.

Interesting that the left and Democratic Party elected officials would rather not allow a Christian medical organization assist with the epidemic, but feel they have no choice but to accept tainted assistance from Christians. But that is the way of socialists, what is best for the entire society is paramount, accepting help from other political/religious ideologies is only done holding ones nose in a time when their is no other choice.

www.theblaze.com... -get-smacked-right-down





In principle I agree with you but having an Evangelical anti LQBTQ running a field hospital its ok to question if they will actually help everyone. Based on your post you would then have absolutely no problem if the Muslim Brotherhood was running it?


+11 more 
posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:48 AM
link   
a reply to: ColoradoJens

Whataboutism ...

A field hospital is a field hospital.

I guess those evil Christian cooties are going to be too much for some critically ill person to overcome so people may die rather than put their butts in a Christian-built aid station?

And no, you don't "agree in principle" or you wouldn't be grousing on about it. Do you demand that the homesewn PPE that is helping prevent infections be stamped and certified 100% organically pure ahtiest made and progressively tolerant in all ways? I'll bet not.

edit on 2-4-2020 by ketsuko because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:50 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

I think it's a legit question, if my choices were wacky Christian or Muslim hospital versus say, NEXUS sex cult hospital the choice is an easy one.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: ColoradoJens

Whataboutism ...

A field hospital is a field hospital.

I guess those evil Christian cooties are going to be too much for some critically ill person to overcome so people may die rather than put their butts in a Christian-built aid station?


No whataboutism. Like I said, I think it's fair to question motives (watch reactions here if it was the muslim brotherhood.) Im not saying don't do it, but its ok to be leery.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ketsuko

I think it's a legit question, if my choices were wacky Christian or Muslim hospital versus say, NEXUS sex cult hospital the choice is an easy one.


I thought you'd be looking for the child slave one because it would have the best hospital food.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: ColoradoJens

Just cause they build it doesn't mean they are running it.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 08:58 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Hmmmm, logical thinking is logical.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:02 AM
link   
a reply to: ColoradoJens

I would have no issue and actually welcome it, if a Muslim charity organization with a very long history of helping non-Muslims, in non-Muslim countries, and a long history of not trying to convert the people they give medical care to, with a history of care regardless of sexual orientation, gender, religion, or political affiliation were to assist by setting up a hospital.

Samaritans purse has a long history of helping non-Christians, in non-Christian countries, and doesn't try to convert patients, and helps patients regardless of their sexual orientation or political affiliation.

I would especially welcome an Ismaili Muslim medical organizations assistance. They are persecuted and hunted/killed when possible, by the Muslim Brotherhood, by the Suni's and Shia's, because they believe in live and let live when it comes to other religions. They believe that Islam needs to move away from the 14th century and into the 21st century when it comes to treatment of and equality for women. They believe killing non-Muslims does NOT send one to paradise and harms the faith of Islam and defiles Allah.

How do I know about Ismaili? I, a awful, horrible, no good Christian know this? Our second Muslim foreign exchange student is Ismaili, and no we haven't tried to convert her, nor did we try to convert or first Shia Muslim exchange student. (Seems I'm not quite the monster you paint Christians to be, am I, or am I bwwaaahhahhaaa - we've welcomed 2 Muslims students into our homes and hearts and didn't try to convert them. We are as bad as Franklin Graham and his hospital. We learned from them, for example our Shia student was a woman and not allowed to attend mosque in her town except on holidays because she is a female, we knew more about the religion than she did as we studied up before she came.)

I would more than welcome any Ismaili Islamic medical organizations assistance them setting up a tent and helping anyone regardless of their sexual preference, religion or political affiliation.

Does that answer your biased and entrapping question? Seems you have a real issue with a well known Christian state of the art medical team helping people with COVID-19, rather let people die huh?


edit on 4/2/20 by The2Billies because: addition


+9 more 
posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:04 AM
link   
a reply to: The2Billies

The left can't exist without hating.

They are showing themselves to be the small people that they are.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ketsuko

I think it's a legit question, if my choices were wacky Christian or Muslim hospital versus say, NEXUS sex cult hospital the choice is an easy one.


Well it seems your list is made up, unrealistic and not reality. It seems the choice here is Christian hospital or no hospital.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: ColoradoJens

originally posted by: The2Billies



New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, who tweeted a statement berating the development: "Franklin Graham has a long history of spewing anti-LGBTQ hate speech, and I find it extremely troubling that he and his organization are involved in our relief efforts in any way. New York City is known around the world for its embrace of diversity, and Franklin Graham has spent his career standing against these values. I will be monitoring this situation closely and making sure that our city's values are being represented at all times.




New York state Sen. Brad Hoylman, who tweeted that "it's a shame that the federal government has left New York with no other choice but to accept charity from bigots." In a statement on his official Senate page, Hoylman called Graham a "notorious anti-LGBTQ pastor" and said he put Graham "on notice" that Samaritan's Purse must "treat all COVID-19 patients equally at the new medical tents." Here's Hoylman's full statement: COVID-19 doesn't discriminate, and neither should Franklin Graham. It's unacceptable that a New Yorker infected with COVID-19 could be subjected to discriminatory treatment from an organization whose leader calls us "immoral" and "detestable."



Note that Samaritans Purse does medical assistance all over the world, for people of all faiths, and asks for nothing in return. That is how awful Christianity is according to the leftist liberals.

Interesting that the left and Democratic Party elected officials would rather not allow a Christian medical organization assist with the epidemic, but feel they have no choice but to accept tainted assistance from Christians. But that is the way of socialists, what is best for the entire society is paramount, accepting help from other political/religious ideologies is only done holding ones nose in a time when their is no other choice.

www.theblaze.com... -get-smacked-right-down





In principle I agree with you but having an Evangelical anti LQBTQ running a field hospital its ok to question if they will actually help everyone. Based on your post you would then have absolutely no problem if the Muslim Brotherhood was running it?


I'm sure you would delight if Planned Parenthood set up a field hospital in Times Square. That group I would not trust with my life at all. I'd be sure to die of Covid 19 in there, they love Christians as much as the Democrats and leftist liberals do.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct
Well it seems your list is made up, unrealistic and not reality.


Sounds like someone doesn't like Muslims or sex cults.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: Alien Abduct

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: ketsuko

I think it's a legit question, if my choices were wacky Christian or Muslim hospital versus say, NEXUS sex cult hospital the choice is an easy one.


Well it seems your list is made up, unrealistic and not reality. It seems the choice here is Christian hospital or no hospital.


I think he chooses not hospital. He is terrified of Christians.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: ColoradoJens

No whataboutism. Like I said, I think it's fair to question motives (watch reactions here if it was the muslim brotherhood.) Im not saying don't do it, but its ok to be leery.


Question what motives? Are you suggesting that Samaritan's Purse is setting up these field hospitals in the hopes that they can let all the undesirables die? Do you really think that's their motive?

Can you provide any quotes or statements from Samaritan's Purse officials that they will not treat LGBTQ patients? Or that they will provide substandard care? Or anything else?

Better yet, can you provide any real life examples -- from anywhere in the world -- that this has happened?



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: The2Billies

originally posted by: ColoradoJens

originally posted by: The2Billies



New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, who tweeted a statement berating the development: "Franklin Graham has a long history of spewing anti-LGBTQ hate speech, and I find it extremely troubling that he and his organization are involved in our relief efforts in any way. New York City is known around the world for its embrace of diversity, and Franklin Graham has spent his career standing against these values. I will be monitoring this situation closely and making sure that our city's values are being represented at all times.




New York state Sen. Brad Hoylman, who tweeted that "it's a shame that the federal government has left New York with no other choice but to accept charity from bigots." In a statement on his official Senate page, Hoylman called Graham a "notorious anti-LGBTQ pastor" and said he put Graham "on notice" that Samaritan's Purse must "treat all COVID-19 patients equally at the new medical tents." Here's Hoylman's full statement: COVID-19 doesn't discriminate, and neither should Franklin Graham. It's unacceptable that a New Yorker infected with COVID-19 could be subjected to discriminatory treatment from an organization whose leader calls us "immoral" and "detestable."



Note that Samaritans Purse does medical assistance all over the world, for people of all faiths, and asks for nothing in return. That is how awful Christianity is according to the leftist liberals.

Interesting that the left and Democratic Party elected officials would rather not allow a Christian medical organization assist with the epidemic, but feel they have no choice but to accept tainted assistance from Christians. But that is the way of socialists, what is best for the entire society is paramount, accepting help from other political/religious ideologies is only done holding ones nose in a time when their is no other choice.

www.theblaze.com... -get-smacked-right-down





In principle I agree with you but having an Evangelical anti LQBTQ running a field hospital its ok to question if they will actually help everyone. Based on your post you would then have absolutely no problem if the Muslim Brotherhood was running it?


I'm sure you would delight if Planned Parenthood set up a field hospital in Times Square. That group I would not trust with my life at all. I'd be sure to die of Covid 19 in there, they love Christians as much as the Democrats and leftist liberals do.


That's a fairly logical assumption based on my post, lol. Continue.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: The2Billies
I think he chooses not hospital. He is terrified of Christians.


Only the wacko extremist ones, pretty much the same way I don't like any wacko extremist religious group.



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:23 AM
link   
a reply to: The2Billies
How dare someone help to make this Pandemic less deadly 🙄 typical democrat.
Nothing and I mean nothing they do surprises me.

No, if they actually helped The American people... I would be shocked



posted on Apr, 2 2020 @ 09:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: ColoradoJens

No whataboutism. Like I said, I think it's fair to question motives (watch reactions here if it was the muslim brotherhood.) Im not saying don't do it, but its ok to be leery.


Question what motives? Are you suggesting that Samaritan's Purse is setting up these field hospitals in the hopes that they can let all the undesirables die? Do you really think that's their motive?

Can you provide any quotes or statements from Samaritan's Purse officials that they will not treat LGBTQ patients? Or that they will provide substandard care? Or anything else?

Better yet, can you provide any real life examples -- from anywhere in the world -- that this has happened?



I never said that. You are putting words in my mouth. I said its ok to question the motive. You also want Muslim Brotherhood running a hospital? Thats fine. I think it would be fair to say most would question it. Evangelicals are not there just to help - they by definition are there to covnvert you. n Edit to add - real world examples of religious organizations hurting people with faith based "cures"? Too many to post.
edit on 2-4-2020 by ColoradoJens because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
13
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join