It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Can anyone point out why so many celebrities, famous people, politicians and military leaders have been stricken with this thing compared to average Joe nobody
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: harold223
Can anyone point out why so many celebrities, famous people, politicians and military leaders have been stricken with this thing compared to average Joe nobody? Something is not right with all of this - it's almost as if it is an attack on the various establishments of more than one country, or its being used as a cover for a silent operation running in unison with what governments are telling their citizens.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: one4all
DNA is irrelevant. As an old student of History, I'm fully aware that there's no such thing as "rightful monarch.
English kings were originally, in case of doubt, elected (by the nobility). I could quote many examples from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.
The current legal situaltion is that the "rightful" monarch is whatever person is so chosen by Parliament. To be specific, that means the succession is governed by the Act of Settlemet of 1700. Or do I mean 1701? This being the case, it would not matter of a million people came forward with what they thought was a better "claim by blood". Nobody has any claim by blood.
originally posted by: ignorant_ape
putting on my " brutal pragmatists " cap
i hope he dies from N19COVID complications
this opinion is not borne of any ill will
i am a monarchist .
but - the death of charles - before the queen - will with one last breath - usher in a clean page - for the reigh of his son as king william v .
charles has acheived a lot - as PoW - there is little of any great magnitude - he will accomplish as king
realistic munkie - being realistic