Very Good News

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: ColoradoJens
a reply to: Serdgiam

Uh, ok. I guess logic is not your strong suit. Ill check back in with you when they announce this is the cure. I'll make a bet that is never. But sure, believe what you want.

Same posters have spent the last couple months thinking this virus is a democratic hoax or a plot to bring down potus, you're going to have a hard time convincing them this isn't the cure..

He’s too small to be the target here.

But maybe something like an overemphasis on the course of a new strain of corona virus so a ‘shutdown’ can be enacted so the worlds corporate corrupt or ‘deep state’ can test how efficiently they’d be able to run and re-design their empires with most of the workforce sitting at home?

Then, they stop the ‘shutdown’, re organise their over reaching global corporate interests etc, and do it again.
For good.

No more reliance on a mass workforce. The same work could be done with 20% of the employees.


I dunno. That’s kind of the best - ‘IF’ this is a hoax then it’s probably something like this - I’ve got so far.

Could really be a killer pandemic though. No doubt. Could kill hundreds of millions of people.

But what it’s not, is a dEmocrat plot to attack the President.

Wow, some are taking this news HARD. Some of you are going to have to change your tactics....again.

a reply to: oloufo

the question is how fast can it be applied on a large scale? normally, it takes at least a year, because it has to be tested on a large number of people first in order to be able to draw the necessary conclusions - because otherwise it could backfire. vaccines are being tested all over the world and if we are lucky, an active substance will be available in a few months. lets hope s

Ya think maybe they could test it on people that are already sick
with the virus?

I mean duh WTF?

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Trump has now abandoned the serious and sober tone he struck when speaking about the pandemic last week. He is no longer acknowledging that the crisis will last for many months. He no longer says saving lives must take precedence over the economy.
"We lose thousands and thousands of people a year to the flu," Trump said during the Fox News town hall. "We don’t turn the country off."
He said he wanted to have the economy "opened up and just raring to go" again by Easter, less than three weeks away.

you go girl

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

Yeah

It’s not about Trump

But if he’s saying that then I’m probably wrong.

originally posted by: ColoradoJens
a reply to: scrounger

Nah, its just another this is the miracle cure article. Perhaps once the cycle of testing 8-12 months typically) is done what they are saying it may be true. Who knows? Thats the point. You don't know.

I have read multiple articles in the same vein - have you not? This drug worked for me! Its the cure!

There has been not a scintilla of factual information provided in this "article" that shows this is the cure - just like all the other articles stating the same who knows, IT MAY BE. But you have 0 clue and to pretend suddenly this article give you knowledge as to what is right and wrong is laughable.

ok where EXACTLY in this article or the OP comments did ANYONE say it was a cure?

that seems to be the point your making

answer that simple question..

scrounger

originally posted by: scrounger

originally posted by: ColoradoJens
a reply to: scrounger

Nah, its just another this is the miracle cure article. Perhaps once the cycle of testing 8-12 months typically) is done what they are saying it may be true. Who knows? Thats the point. You don't know.

I have read multiple articles in the same vein - have you not? This drug worked for me! Its the cure!

There has been not a scintilla of factual information provided in this "article" that shows this is the cure - just like all the other articles stating the same who knows, IT MAY BE. But you have 0 clue and to pretend suddenly this article give you knowledge as to what is right and wrong is laughable.

ok where EXACTLY in this article or the OP comments did ANYONE say it was a cure?

that seems to be the point your making

answer that simple question..

scrounger

So what's the very good news?

This is the part I'm struggling with ?

originally posted by: underwerks
Not a doctor, but something tells me you probably shouldn’t get medical advice from a political talk show.

Or on any social media.

He claims:

350 patients
Breathing restored in 3-4 hours
Zero deaths
Zero hospital
Zero intubation

Some nausea and diarrhoea side effect

Sounds like bad news to me. Not very good news at all.

Do NOT pursue this avenue of research!

a reply to: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

So what's the very good news?

This is the part I'm struggling with ?

We can see that.

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
He claims:

350 patients
Breathing restored in 3-4 hours
Zero deaths
Zero hospital
Zero intubation

Some nausea and diarrhoea side effect

Sounds like bad news to me. Not very good news at all.

Do NOT pursue this avenue of research!

Explain it me real slowly then.

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: underwerks
Not a doctor, but something tells me you probably shouldn’t get medical advice from a political talk show.

Yeah, much better to get it form a corrupt politicized globalist
organization like The WHO.

/s

Apparently a Colt-45 relieves symptoms immediately. Should we all try that?



... and, yeah, I'd trust the World Health Organization (a group of doctors and subject matter experts) more than some political mouthpiece.

But even they can be swayed, under the right pressure, to say what ever they think will minimize deaths. Even if it isn't entirely true.

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: Breakthestreak
He claims:

350 patients
Breathing restored in 3-4 hours
Zero deaths
Zero hospital
Zero intubation

Some nausea and diarrhoea side effect

Sounds like bad news to me. Not very good news at all.

Do NOT pursue this avenue of research!

Explain it me real slowly then.

It’s

In

The

OP

I don’t know any more than you. But it sounds like real bad news. They should abandon.

a reply to: IncessantOptimist

It's untested for this disease.

A man died from drinking this stuff.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Then he shouldn’t have drunken it. The fool.

Would you drink something with similar ingredients to a treatment for a deadly virus that you bought from the pet shop?

Labelled ‘Tank Cleaner’?

a reply to: Breakthestreak

Yep...people just aren't allowed to have hope I suppose....

a reply to: chr0naut

Apparently a Colt-45 relieves symptoms immediately. Should we all try that?

You first.
I mean it is your idea and I am willing to learn.
I'll take notes.

a reply to: Breakthestreak

So ridicule is all you have to offer when asked to explain this very good news, can you at least in you're own words explain what the good news is, I mean other than, if, maybe , could be , 12 months etc.

I'm all ears champ ?

originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: Breakthestreak

Yep...people just aren't allowed to have hope I suppose....

Hopes and prayers...

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: Breakthestreak

So ridicule is all you have to offer when asked to explain this very good news, can you at least in you're own words explain what the good news is, I mean other than, if, maybe , could be , 12 months etc.

I'm all ears champ ?

In my words

The good news is that this doctor has treated over 300 patients with very positive results

Like it states in the op of this thread. Is it not good news?

I think it is.

If “the virus has now been cured and you can all return to your lives” is the only thing that can possibly be considered very good news then, I dunno.