It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UK Crisis Act Corruption

page: 1
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 03:48 PM
link   
Hi there. UK citizen here.

I was just watching the parliament session live feed, where they were finalising the corona virus crisis act. I'll not go into any detail about what that act entails since it is a monster of a document, but suffice to say it is draconian and has a duration of 2 YEARS.

The act was passed and the session moved to all the administration work and notifying departments and all that house cleaning stuff. However, one of the MPs requested the floor after the Yays had it and demanded to speak. He informed the parliament that he believed that the act was fundamentally broken and wouldn't work as written, going on to explain his reasons why.

As written the act would come under review in 6 months time, where any nonessential temporary measures could be voted out. These temporary measures were identified in Section X [sic]. However Section X did not actually define any measures at all, meaning that there were no temporary measures that could be voted out. This means that when the 6 month date came, either the whole act would have to be thrown out, or it would have to play out to it's full term of two years as written.

Another MP interjected, representing the courts. He declared that as written, the act was outside the jurisdiction of the courts and that the only people with the power to make amendments were The Crown and the Prime Minister, meaning that no MP could represent their constituents and no state hearings could be made on the matter.

The MP who's team had written up the crisis act rose to address the issues and... well nothing! They cut the feed!!!

The UK has no gone into lockdown and will remain so for 2 YEARS!!!!!!!




posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 03:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Zehmzaziel

That is stunning!

Is coronavirus now killing more citizens in the United Kingdom then the common flu bug?



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 03:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Zehmzaziel

Good luck out there.

NWO here we come.




posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:02 PM
link   
Feed cut so that Joe Public can’t listen whilst the draconian level of the act is discussed, extraordinary.

The lack of suitable review/exits clauses in 6 months is telling. Effectively 2 years of emergency powers and nothingness can be done to revoke it.

Boris has grown his parliamentary majority SIGNIFICANTLY!



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: 0010110011101
Feed cut so that Joe Public can’t listen whilst the draconian level of the act is discussed, extraordinary.

The lack of suitable review/exits clauses in 6 months is telling. Effectively 2 years of emergency powers and nothingness can be done to revoke it.

Boris has grown his parliamentary majority SIGNIFICANTLY!


Funny that, I'm watching Adan Afryie live debating with Penny Mordaunt on the Parliament Channel



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zehmzaziel


The UK has no gone into lockdown and will remain so for 2 YEARS!!!!!!!


Calm down, mate.

It is "up to" 2 years. That's the ceiling.

It could end a LOT sooner. Well, I #ing hope so.




PS: Oh, and this from the PM:


"We will look again in three weeks, and relax them if the evidence shows we are able to."


www.bbc.co.uk...


edit on 23-3-2020 by ConfusedBrit because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:10 PM
link   
I’m sure Dominic Cummings made sure the bill read as it does.

The thing is, this wouldn’t have to be necessary if idiots would have just followed advice. But no, let’s all treat it as an extended holiday and go to the beach, parks and heritage sites. Useful idiots of course.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Zehmzaziel




The UK has no gone into lockdown and will remain so for 2 YEARS!!!!!!!

We will remain so while the problem exists , the lockdown will be reviewed in 3 weeks.

For the sake of the economy and those susceptible to this virus the measures seem the only option left as the great British public have shown no interest in adhering to the measures they were asked to adhere to.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:11 PM
link   


migt not be as fun as Alexander and Richard though
edit on 23-3-2020 by UpIsNowDown because: typo



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:14 PM
link   
Necessary steps.
Let's be clear, in 2009 H1n1 spread to 1.4 billion people worldwide. If that happens with Corona we're looking at the biggest disaster in human history. We HAVE to stop this virus spreading.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:18 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust


I've no idea of the death count since I don't trust the numbers that the news reports. However I do trust my mother who is a nurse at the general hospital. According to her, there has been ONE death in my city attributed to corona virus. I live in Sheffield, which is the fourth largest city in the UK.

All non essential shops and businesses have now been closed. All public events are cancelled. Weddings, religious gatherings etc are all cancelled. No travel. Funerals can still happen, but they can not be attended and live feed services are been set up. The military are going to be deployed in the cities. People are only allowed to leave their homes once a day for essentials, and are not allowed to visit family or friends. Prisoners are being released. Only those people listed as "key personnel" are given any freedoms - key personnel are food chain industry, heath workers, journalists, emergency services, police and government.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:21 PM
link   
I am not sure how this will be Policed, my understanding is that the UK Police force has been cut drastically in recent years?.

I suspect the Army would be drafted in at some point?.

I had lurked on ATS for ages reading Doom porn threads, I never expected to actual post in one as it unfolds, some of the non MSM stuff on Covid-19 is down right scary and I would hate to even begin to suggest how this all ends...

Look out for each other, stay safe folks....
edit on 23-3-2020 by Petra137 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
I’m sure Dominic Cummings made sure the bill read as it does.

The thing is, this wouldn’t have to be necessary if idiots would have just followed advice. But no, let’s all treat it as an extended holiday and go to the beach, parks and heritage sites. Useful idiots of course.



The whole point of the advice is to drag it out as long as possible. If you want this over with as soon as possible its time to bring back "pox parties". Infect everyone, then after 3 weeks it's done.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:28 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Some 336 people have now died in the UK, aged between 18 and 105.

Make from that what you will but the figure is expected to rise significantly.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Jason79

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
I’m sure Dominic Cummings made sure the bill read as it does.

The thing is, this wouldn’t have to be necessary if idiots would have just followed advice. But no, let’s all treat it as an extended holiday and go to the beach, parks and heritage sites. Useful idiots of course.



The whole point of the advice is to drag it out as long as possible. If you want this over with as soon as possible its time to bring back "pox parties". Infect everyone, then after 3 weeks it's done.


I have elderly parents and relatives that wouldn’t get through it if they were infected. I don’t believe our health system would either. Not that I trust our Government, but I trust the health professionals who tell us to stay home.

edit on 23/3/20 by Cobaltic1978 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:36 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Unless that 3 week review was decided in the 20 minuets between the live feed shutting down and the PMs address, 3 weeks is a lie. The crisis act is available to read and it states that it comes under review in 6 months.



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Zehmzaziel

After three weeks they will say that because we are stupid and have violated the protocols we have to suffer penalties for a couple of months, but i bet we can all go outside by Christmas, but then its like only a month to the next outbreak.




posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 04:40 PM
link   
Assume you mean the Coronavirus Bill. This places the action of the Government to contain and act against coronavirus on a legal footing.

I think you are over-imagining what the Bill is. Have you been watching YouTube?

Here's and explanation of the Bill


The bill enables action in 5 key areas:
- increasing the available health and social care workforce – for example, by removing barriers to allow recently retired NHS staff and social workers to return to work etc...
- easing the burden on frontline staff – by reducing the number of administrative tasks they have to perform, etc...
- containing and slowing the virus – by reducing unnecessary social contacts, for example through powers over events and gatherings, and strengthening the quarantine powers of police and immigration officers
- managing the deceased with respect and dignity – ...
- supporting people – by allowing them to claim Statutory Sick Pay from day one, and by supporting the food industry to maintain supplies


EDIT to add. The Draft Bill opens in PDF


originally posted by: ZehmzazielThese temporary measures were identified in Section X [sic]. However Section X did not actually define any measures at all, meaning that there were no temporary measures that could be voted out.
There is no Section X. Section 10 is about indemnity.
edit on 23/3/2020 by paraphi because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: paraphi

I know there is no section X. I can't remember the specific line the MP quoted, hence the X.

However,

Section 76/3
"A time specified under subsection (2) in relation to a provision of this Act must
not be later than the end of the period of 6 months beginning with the time
when the provision would otherwise have expired (whether by virtue of
section 75 or previous regulations under subsection (1) or (2))."

There's the 6 month minimum before the act can be altered.

ED: Ignore that. Not relevant. I'm not a lawyer, so reading this stuff is hard for me.
edit on 23-3-2020 by Zehmzaziel because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 23 2020 @ 07:25 PM
link   
I found the video of the live stream. Skip to -8:27, right near the end to hear it from the horses mouth.

www.youtube.com...



new topics

top topics



 
7
<<   2 >>

log in

join